Steller earnings at St. Joe yesterday propelled the Fairholme Fund to a gain of 15.01%. That may be the largest single day advance for a mutual fund I have ever seen. This on top of a YTD gain of either 33.3% (Morningstar) OR 34.34% (Yahoo).
There are always a lot of "Yeah, but"s when talking about Fairholme's performance, but from inception it has done just fine, especially after this year, and especially after yesterday. One has to go cherry picking to choose time periods which cast it in a bad light.
"Sure it's done great this year, for the past year, for the past 3 years, the past 5 years and the past 20 years, and it's done okay for the past 15 years --- but what about that 10 year number???"
I think what Bruce Berkowitz has always talked about delivering was good but quite lumpy returns. Is that what we're now seeing?
And by the way, what about this discrepancy between Morningstar and Yahoo? Does this happen often? Which is correct?
Comments
(update - Morningstar has corrected their number)
Annualized return for St. Joe over the past decade is 11.53%
FAIRX holds 4 stocks. It is non-diversified in extreme.
The fund has landed in the top 5% or the bottom 5% every year in the past nine. It seems not so much a matter of having to wait a decade for a big pop as it is a matter of having more losing years than winning ones.