Published articles asking for public help in identifying criminal suspects, with no racial description, drawing, or picture.I had believed that our San Francisco Chronicle was perhaps unique in this, but the New York Times is another one:
This, this morning, from the NY Times:
‘We Need All Eyes on This’: Police Officers Hunt for Subway Gunman
The police released images of the suspect who fatally shot a 48-year-old man on the Q train on Sunday, and they asked for help in locating the gunman.
“We need all eyes on this,” Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell wrote on Twitter early Monday, along with two pictures of the person who the police believe pulled out a gun Sunday and fatally shot a commuter in an unprovoked attack.Except that the Times didn't show any pictures. Nor mention what race the gunman might be.
How very helpful. How very PC. How very, very stupid.
Comments
NYC got problems I’m afraid.
https://twitter.com/NYPDPC/status/1528699680443355137?cxt=HHwWgsCi0dGQhLcqAAAA
So where is the political correctness here?
NY Times: Well, maybe some other eyes, but not ours.
"Masks conceal the identity of criminals. True since Highwaymen in the dark ages."
"This photo is useless."
I'm not really sure what exactly you wanted the Times to do. They provided the link to the photos in the story.