Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

California Set To Pass The Nation's First Wealth Tax Targeting The Ultra Rich

edited August 2020 in Off-Topic
Looks like more high net worth tax payers will be leaving the number one GDP producing state.

Here are the details ... https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/california-set-pass-nations-first-wealth-tax-targeting-ultra-rich

The Dems' answer is to raise taxes ... this is not a measure that will increase production. This will over time continue a greater movement away from Calif. to other states and Countries. Wise up ... Vote for the return of Reganonomics ... Not Greater Taxation.

Comments

  • Hello Texas!
  • And ... in addition to Texas ... Hello to the New South as well!
  • WSJ: So Long, California? Goodbye, Texas? Taxpayers Decide Some States Aren’t Worth It
    Texas ranks among the states with the highest share of taxpayers who pay more than $10,000 in property taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/so-long-california-goodbye-texas-taxpayers-decide-some-states-arent-worth-it-11579948200

  • I heard from friends in NYC that 'they' (some legislators either from NYC or in Albany, I'm not sure) were floating the idea of implementing some form of exit tax and/or expat surcharge for folks moving out of the area, similar to what you pay when you give up your citizenship and leave the country.
  • You're usually better than "I heard something from someone who thinks that ..."
    (To your credit, you clearly stated the sketchiness of this rumor.)

    Let's ignore for the moment that such a tax would likely be unconstitutional, as the Constitution implicitly guarantees freedom of interstate travel.

    Best guess is that this rumor is the result of conflating (and misreading) two (or more) different stories. One dates from a year ago, when MSM was making a big deal out of the fact that states are aggressive when it comes to saying who is a resident, and thus subject to state income taxes. For example, CNBC, March 8, 2019:
    Barry Horowitz, a partner at the WithumSmith+Brown accounting firm [said] “New York has always been aggressive. But it’s getting worse.”

    Stories of the wealthy counting the number of days they spend in New York and Florida to make sure they comply with the residency rules have been a staple of the New York and Palm Beach social circuit for decades. Conventional wisdom holds that if you’re out of New York State for 183 days, you don’t have to pay state taxes. But tax advisers say that while the number of days matter, the real test for auditors is “domicile” — being able to prove that a taxpayer’s permanent, primary home is in Florida rather than New York. The domicile test has become increasingly complicated as today’s migratory rich maintain four or five homes, and rarely spend much time in any one place.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/08/tax-collectors-chase-rich-new-yorkers-moving-to-low-tax-states.html

    Another story has to do with a current New York Senate bill (that's one house of the legislature in Albany) cosponsored by state Senators from NYC to Syracuse. It's currently sitting in committee. This legislation would alter the way income is defined for (119) billionaires, from realized gains to mark-to-market income. This would not be a wealth tax. And it certainly would not be an exit tax.

    Politico, July 30, 2020: https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2020/07/29/would-a-new-billionaires-tax-be-constitutional-1304177
  • edited August 2020
    It's about time. According to the Fed, America's household net worth after deducting liabilities stood at $111 trillion at the end of the first quarter of 2020: https://federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/z1/balance_sheet/chart/
    Of that $111 trillion, the bottom 50% of the population in terms of wealth owned only $1.5 trillion: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBLB50107 Given the preponderance of California tech millionaires and billionaires, no place is more deserving of a wealth tax and I doubt many of them will even bat an eye at paying a few percentage points to be at the center of America's tech intelligence and enjoying the beautiful weather and landscapes of California.
  • edited August 2020
    ^ what he said
  • Red states should ban the rich liberal scum from coming to their states...don't need them bringing that LIBERAL DISEASE with them & ruining well run red states.
  • Would those be the same "well-run red states" that thought that they were immune from the coronavirus "hoax", and are now paying the price with the dead bodies of their citizens?
  • @rsorden Liberal blue states should secede and watch red states devolve into bankrupt banana republics without blue state tax revenue propping them up.
  • edited August 2020
    d
  • edited August 2020
    d
  • Or maybe the liberal blue states could merge with Canada: for example, the three Pacific Coast states or the 6 New England states joined by NY NJ MD and DE. MN would be another possibility as well.
  • @carew388
    Many in central-eastern and southeastern Michigan already speak the Ontario dialect. The Detroit-Windsor and Port Huron-Sarnia border crossings are heavily trafficked international points in the U.S.
    Canadian National RR owns the rail lines in Michigan. My trained eye traveling interstates here indicates at least 25% of the truck traffic I see has a Canadian province license plate and more during certain periods.
    Well........anyway
  • edited August 2020
    Old_Skeet said:

    Looks like more high net worth tax payers will be leaving the number one GDP producing state.

    [[zh crap here]]

    The Dems' answer is to raise taxes ... this is not a measure that will increase production. This will over time continue a greater movement away from Calif. to other states and Countries. Wise up ... Vote for the return of Reganonomics ... Not Greater Taxation.

    OS,
    Reagan was the beginning of all of this latest wave of destructiveness, not just the irrational and seductive hatred of government but the creditcard model for federal spending. What a evil bastard that man was, all while oozing his bigoted charm. And his greed economics was a disaster and a yuge jump to where we are as to inequality.

    But I suspect you know all of this in your heart.
  • edited August 2020
    Wouldn't "ultra-rich" be more in the billionaire range? $30m is garden-variety rich.

    Wise observation Old_Skeet, sir.
  • Wise up! Lowering taxes on the rich and ultra rich is guaranteed to raise production.

    Absolutely incontrovertible. Proven time after time. "Trickle Down" works great too.
Sign In or Register to comment.