Hi, guys.
I'm trying to think about instances in which a parent and child were both fund managers, but the child worked to get away from the parent. (Mostly these are father-son pairs, with Roy and Rose Papp as the only father-daughter one that comes to mind.)
The Yacktmans (Yacktman and YCG) come immediately to mind. The Dodsons (Parnassus and Frank Value). The Bogles, sort of (Vanguard and Bogle).
Setting aside the family-run boutiques (Crawford, Queens Road, Muhlenkamp - eeee!), can you think of other instances were the scion struck out on his own? It comes up, mostly, because its happening again with the Oelschlagers. Mark was a rising star at Oak Associates, and a fine manager, until something happened and he was gone. He's about to launch two funds that are sort of clones of his earlier charges.
Thanks, as ever,
David
Comments
Be well!
Unfortunately, they haven’t managed any mutual funds that I know of - nor have they worked together.
“Father, Son Play Together but Invest Apart / Stovalls Are Split On Growth vs. Value”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121339953151973707
Regards,
Ted
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/02/08/business/mutual-funds-all-in-the-davis-family-still-picking-winners.html
Davis Funds Website:
https://davisfunds.com/
Fisher
https://forbes.com/forbes/2011/0627/money-guide-11-funds-bruce-fund-heebner-cgm-invest.html
https://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/01/business/one-family-two-generations-three-feisty-funds.html
Father and son work together here. Daniel F. Dent runs the Premier Growth fund (DFDPX) with his son Matthew. Both have over $1m invested. Matthew also co-manages the Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) again with over a million of his own money invested. Daniel has been manager of Premier Growth for 18 years and Matthew manager of Midcap Growth for 8 years.
The more I read about this outfit the more I like them and their funds. However, there was a 3 year period of relative underperformance from 2014-16 in both funds but they have shined since. The expense ratios are on the high side and I wonder if this partially explains why the AUM in each fund is still so small. Then again AKREX has grown into a $12bn fund with an even higher expense ratio.