By way of Fuller Money:
"...But according to "Economics 101", quantitative easing, on the heroic scale we have witnessed thus far, should already have led to rampant if not hyper inflation. That it hasn't is down to the continuing decline in the velocity of circulation of money. In simple terms the banks aren't lending (compared with the amount of money available to them), but instead are punting on financial assets, which is where "inflation" is ending up and benefitting their balance sheets… Charles Hugh-Smith put the Fed's actions into context very well, if indelicately for some, on his recent Of Two Minds website. BoE, ECB and BoJ please take note."
Worth a read...
View from the Bridge
Comments
Anyway, the gist of the article was a thoughtful discussion on the subject, and a suggestion that maybe the so-called fiscal policies don't actually work exactly like they (University of Chicago / Austrian economic schools) had thought...