Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Barry Ritholtz: Index Funds Sure Don’t Seem Like Libor

FYI: Last month, the New York Times ran an op-ed that suggested index funds may not be as transparent as they seem or should be, or as well-regulated. The article, written by a Securities and Exchange Commission member and a University of California - Berkeley law professor also implied that the indexes on which the funds are based could be subject to manipulation and other abuses.

I heartily endorse any sentiment that mandates more timely and detailed disclosure of index-fund holdings. However, some of the authors' claims and assumptions don't stand up to close scrutiny.

First, let's get a definitional issue out of the way. The authors wrote that “index funds typically track a broad group of stocks, like all the companies in the Dow Jones industrial average or the S.&P. 500.”
Regards,
Ted
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-18/index-funds-sure-don-t-seem-like-libor
Sign In or Register to comment.