FYI: So if, like most of us, you’re an index investor, how do you reduce the risk of owning one big individual stock, even if it has been a great one, like Apple? Indexes are supposed to provide that diversification, but in a market-cap-weighted index such the S&P, one or two stocks that have racked up big gains can become a disproportionate share of your holdings.
Equally weighted index ETFs solve that problem. Since they hold an equal amount of every stock in a sector or index, they rebalance regularly (usually every quarter) by selling off the excess gains of the winning stocks and buying enough of the losers to maintain the portfolio’s equal weighting. Equal weighting is part of “factor” or “smart beta” investing, in which investors identify what BlackRock calls “broad, historically persistent drivers of return” to produce better risk-adjusted performance than traditional, market-cap-weighted indexes
Regards,
Ted
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/long-term-investors-can-beat-the-sp-500-by-favoring-equal-weighted-etfs-2018-09-26/print
Comments
the-case-for-health-care-stocks
RYH would be one choice:
etfdb.com/index/sp-equal-weight-index-health-care/
http://www.fortunefinancialadvisors.com/blog/the-inflation-advantage-of-equal-weight
If you compare RSP with SP500 for 9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1y, it lags in each one.
I for one had not realized the degree to which the last decade has been LC. I knew it had, but not this extent.