MFOHome About Commentary Discussions Funds The Best Resources Support Us!

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Categories

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Mark Hulbert: Why the Traditional Way of Measuring ‘Value’ Stocks May Be History

TedTed
in The Bullpen
FYI: Is “value” dead? Or have we just been measuring it in the wrong way?

It’s an urgent question, because value stocks—when defined according to the traditional criterion, low price-to-book-value ratios—have lagged behind growth stocks for at least a decade now. And though value stocks in the past have come roaring back after going through similarly long periods of lagging, some researchers are questioning whether they will do so again.
Regards,
Ted
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-traditional-way-of-measuring-value-stocks-may-be-history-1536545400?mod=nwsrl_journal_reports_funds_etfs&cx_refModule=nwsrl
Sign In or Register to comment.