Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Jonathan Clements: Low Fidelity: Five Key Questions

FYI: WE HAVE FINALLY hit rock-bottom. Last week, Fidelity Investments announced that it was introducing two index funds with zero annual expenses, while also slashing expenses on its other index funds and dropping the required minimum investment on all funds, both actively managed and indexed. All of this raises five key questions.
Regards,
Ted
http://www.humbledollar.com/2018/08/low-fidelity/

Comments

  • Mr. Clements should have moved back another decade into the late 1970's when Fidelity was hammering upon the 5-8% loads charged by Merrill Lynch and similar organizations for active managed mutual funds.
    Yes, Fido had some load funds, too; but at a lower "fee". The Fido eventually disappeared, too.
    I'll call this the "K-Mart" effect. Volume, volume, volume........force the competitors to match or get out of the way, using the low margin to gain market share and still make a profit on large volume. I had a good view of this, seeing the exposure of K-Mart (Michigan corp.) in Michigan in the early days.
    It is not difficult to imagine one's hard won money being invested in a fund in 1980 with a front load of (lets be generous) of 7%; versus today, where the same type of investment may be had as an index or etf with an expense ratio of .04%.
    Nuff said......
Sign In or Register to comment.