MFOHome About Commentary Discussions Funds The Best Resources Support Us!

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Categories

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Chuck Jaffe: Longtime Fund Closes As Both A Winner And Loser: Mathers Fund

TedTed
edited July 2018 in Fund Discussions
FYI: ( In my opinion, this column is a direct result of the conversation that Chuck had with David Snowball on his recent show regarding the Mathers Fund)

Yes that sounds confusing, but while Mathers is a unique fund, its situation — with investors never knowing quite what to make of it — is not that uncommon in the fund world.
Regards,
Ted
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/longtime-fund-closes-as-both-a-winner-and-loser/

David Snowball On Money Life Show:
https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/moneylife-with-chuck-jaffe/e/55125809?autoplay=true

Comments

  • sma3
    I looked at this ( and I think i owned it too ) years ago. Mathers preceded Hussman as a Perma Perma bear always complaining that the stock market was overvalued. Why he couldn't even beat a money market fund I don't know. Why he still has $8 million in assets is even more inexplicable
  • MarkMark
    sma3 - see Stedman Funds, or for that matter why do people still have money laying around with Berkowitz or Hussman. Waiting to get back to even is not an investment plan.
Sign In or Register to comment.