I've been using MaxDD and Ulcer Index frequently in making decisions to buy funds. The reason is I really want to hold them for long time and don't want to be "stopped out" when fund hits a bad patch.
However, I've been taking things at face value and something not adding up. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. Take GTSOX for instance. I have waited to buy this for a long time. When it corrected a bit with the market I observed it. It tanked much more than the MaxDD number. Now I don't know how frequently MFO data gets updated, but let's leave that aside for a minute.
The fund has now recovered nicely. BUT, I have a question. Currently the MaxDD number in the Risk profile says -6.1% and this occurred 2015-9. A cursory examination of the GTSOX chart on stockcharts suggests this number should be higher - from over 10.6 to under 9.7. Moreover, I see another drop down 2016-3 not reflected in MFO tables which looks like from over 10.8 to under 9.7, almost 9.6, i.e. an even larger drop.
Can someone explain what I'm doing/seeing wrong?
http://schrts.co/wbPujQ
Comments
Thanks- OJ
Over a shorter timeframe (2014-2018): it appears that (-6.1%) MaxDD is correct:
Here's link to screenshot of full risk/return profile for GTSOX.
The risk and performance metrics are computed from total monthly returns.
We are about to go live with a much expanded database, thanks to a new global feed from Lipper. Ratings will include CEFs, holdings data, and much more.
Hope that helps.
The 2016 drop can be better observed by creating a 2016 -2018 chart shown here.