Folks, I've had it with Quicken. I can't live with their subscription-based model. Looking for alternatives.
I only use following features which are important to me
a) Enter my expenses manually (I don't use online sync and don't want to)
b) Enter my investment transactions manually (I don't use online sync and don't want to)
c) Download latest prices of securities owned (which let's me see how much money I got but I'm okay if I lose this)
d) Keep track of cost-basis, short/long term capital losses for tax filing purposes (I don't want to lose this)
The reason I persisted with Quicken was because they didn't seem like they would move to Cloud based model. Now I'm entirely not sure about that based on the direction the company is going. Not only am I finding it a challenge to discover alternatives, the one that might work seem to be storing my data online - a complete non-starter for me. I want my data on my PC, period.
Appreciate any advice, or I'm going to become an expert in Excel (not a good way to spend one's life).
Comments
I also gave up on Quicken. I use spreadsheets, using GoogleFinance functions for getting the data. I have three spreadsheets to do all my financial stuff.
First is my expenses. Categories in the columns and the date and payee in the rows. At the bottom I do an estimation of each category.
Second is my Income spreadsheet. The columns have the type of income, earned, interest, div, qualified div, stcg, and ltcg. Each row has the investments filled in. One row for each distribution or payment. At the bottom, everything is added up.
My investments spreadsheet has one summary main sheet, and sub sheets for each investment. The GoogleFinance functions fill in the daily prices, but you could do it manually too. The sub sheets take care of each buy and sell and help figure a cost basis.
I wrote a half-baked web page about my investment spreadsheet. If you PM me, I can give you the url. I wrote it but haven't spent time fine tuning the page yet, but I know you will be able to understand what I did.
Disclaimer: While I've been familiar with spreadsheets for over 30 years, I'm not that good at them. But I get by.
Dave
And, Excel is just an extension of what you would do with a pencil and paper (columns and rows). Fun actually when you get used to it.
https://www.doughroller.net/personal-finance/7-alternatives-to-quicken/
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-helpful-spreadsheet-templates-help-manage-finances/
@MikeM, Yes I saw that link. Problem is I haven't found satisfactory solution to Cost Basis/Capital Gains reporting in the alternatives, unless you think I missed something.
With tech, we tend to master the things we need to make our lives easier. My needs are pretty basic. Never used Quicken. I’d never trade my paper budget for a digital version. Short of fire, flood or theft it’s highly reliable, won’t crash and doesn’t require backing up. Has worked well for over 20 years.
After abandoning various “free” online portfolio trackers (like Yahoo & Google) in favor of Mobile Interactive’s app, I’ve never looked back. Much more reliable. Basic version is cheap. Can be had without ads for small fee. “Premium” levels are available for higher cost. Why comfortable monitoring investments digitally? Because the brokerage serves as the backup in case your digital copy crashes. (App also will backup to the cloud.)
If you're using average cost, that's a little different. Here's a template that might help with that:
http://www.costbasis.com/mutualfds/averagecostsingle.html
Of course, wash sales can complicate things a bit.
Of course if you don't need all of the capabilities then work out another alternative that might be cheaper. But the time you spend over a calendar year to do the same things that Quicken can do may be worth more to you than $100.
If anyone knows of any reasonably priced alternatives for portfolio management that can provide reasonably accurate asset allocations across stocks and mutual funds (without requiring you to hand over access to your accounts) and some performance statistics please post it here.
All of the alternatives I have seen cost thousands of dollars. I hope that with the new company Quicken will improve their long standing profound weakness and do a better job with return calculations.
As I reflect whether $100 is a fair price, Adobe Photoshop (PS) has also moved to the subscription model a few years ago, the current basic subscription price is set at $9.99 per month (the more features you want costs more). PS is a complex program and one which requires frequent updates to respond to continuous innovations in cameras, video cards and digital media in general. Another difference to Quicken is the universe of users, much restricted for PS. My guess is that if PS pricing is profitable any discussion of price setting for Quicken close to $100 is not be driven by requirements of updates alone, but to a greater focus on larger profits.
To be honest, however, I’m more in agreement with @sma3 above. If you’re using the software to enhance your investment returns (hopefully by $1000s per year), than $100 or even $200 per year isn’t unreasonable for that service. You “pay to play” with tech. What’s the material in an iphone X worth? Only a few bucks. Yet they’re selling for near $1000 because of the R&D that went into the product and Apple’s never ending efforts to service those who own their products and upgrade the software (and keep it free of malicious bugs).