Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
1. that he is dating another Fidelity portfolio manager 2. that he had to get an HR waiver to permit him to have that relationship with a junior colleague 3. that he claims that he left, voluntarily and amicably, because he was going to propose marriage and he thought it just wasn't wise for a married couple to have the same employer 4. all of which is "strenuously" pressed by his attorney.
The Journal's implied reaction is signaled by the headline they use when the story continues on page 2: "FIRED"
Comments
1. that he is dating another Fidelity portfolio manager
2. that he had to get an HR waiver to permit him to have that relationship with a junior colleague
3. that he claims that he left, voluntarily and amicably, because he was going to propose marriage and he thought it just wasn't wise for a married couple to have the same employer
4. all of which is "strenuously" pressed by his attorney.
The Journal's implied reaction is signaled by the headline they use when the story continues on page 2: "FIRED"
Two long-time analysts step in.
David
https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/10/12/fidelity-said-fire-star-fund-manager-after-sexual-harassment-allegation/MG5q1Mmcvo6xsooVc2tODI/story.html