FYI: I challenge Sharpe’s (1991) famous equality that “
before costs, the return on the average actively managed dollar will equal the return on the average passively managed dollar.
”
This equality is based on the implicit assumption that the market portfolio never changes, which does not hold in the real world because new shares are issued, others are repurchased, and indices are reconstituted so
even “passive”
investors must regularly trade. Therefore, active managers can be worth positive fees in aggregate, allowing them to play an important role in the economy: helping allocate resources efficiently. Passive investing also plays a useful economic role: creating low-cost access to markets
Regards,
Ted
http://ritholtz.com/2017/08/sharpening-arithmetic-active-management/
