Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Barclays Will Refund $97 Million To Advisory, Brokerage Clients

FYI: (Click On Article Title At Top Of Google Search)

In a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Barclays Capital has agreed to refund more than $97 million in advisory and mutual fund fees to clients who were overcharged.
Regards,
Ted
https://www.google.com/#q=Barclays+will+refund+$97+million+to+advisory,+brokerage+clients

Comments

  • According to the SEC press release it seems that "overcharging" might be considered the least of it. (To me, overcharging is charging a fee higher than agreed upon.)

    Barclays charged for services not provided (2,000 customers). Barclays collected "excess fees" by recommending higher cost share classes when cheaper share classes were available (63 customers). Those strike me as more egregious than charging, say $6.95 for a trade that was supposed to cost $4.95.

    Though there were also many miscalculations and billing errors (22,138 customers). The refund for all violations was $67M. $30M of the payment was for penalties.

    Usual disclaimer: All of the above are SEC findings. Barclays neither confirms nor denies.
  • edited May 2017
    Why is it not possible for me to rob people and not go to jail? Oh I see, let a bunch of us get together and do it. This way if we don't get away with it, or get away with it long enough, then no one can figure out who to put into jail, and we can pay a fine if someone finds out. The amount we stole would have paid for itself by then.

    The best part is "Barclays agreed to settle...". How magnanimous of them.
Sign In or Register to comment.