Hi Guys,
Most financial wizards recommend that some portion of our portfolios should be invested in foreign markets. The obvious question is which markets? There is no obvious answer and it is likely that the answer morphs over time anyway.
I have always liked the checkerboard presentation of returns data over time as a nice statistics summary. If patterns exist, they always escape my interpretations. Here is a Link that presents returns for various countries in that checkerboard format:
https://novelinvestor.com/international-stHere is a Link to a more recent 2017 detailed report on international market performance as compiled by Credit Suisse:
https://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/?fileID=B8FDD84D-A4CD-D983-12840F52F61BA0B4Enjoy. I hope you find these references useful when making your investment decisions.
Best Regards
Comments
Does global count as international? Because that's mostly what I own. There are no excuses....the dollar....interest rates......politics, etc. Go where you will. Do what you must, but just win, baby! Or will find someone else who can do the Al Davis type of investing.
God bless
the Pudd
Are we on the same page on should I contact Duke?
Derf
Regards,
Ted
Global Equitirs: Balancing Home Bias And Diversification:
https://personal.vanguard.com/pdf/ISGGEB.pdf
Thanks very much for this excellent Vanguard study reference. It is a nice supplement to the Credit Suisse study that I referenced earlier. A diversity of perspective is always useful to provide a welcomed.balance.
The Vanguard work looks at a ton of what-if scenarios. Note its emphasis on portfolio volatility in terms of standard deviation. The study demonstrates the benefits of diversification, but also it shows relatively little sensitivity of those benefits as a function of the percent of foreign holdings. The parametric plots show rolling hills rather than cliffs. And the benefits seem to be decreasing in recent years. The world is becoming more tightly correlated with increasing trade and communication. Globalization is happening.
Thank you again for your find and Link. I,would expect nothing less from a Marine, and my expectations are never disappointed.
Best Wishes
Nick de Peyster
Undervalued Stocks
Current prices would tell us that valuations are much better outside the U.S. But there are so many things beside valuations to consider, including political and currency risk.
Global stock funds might be a way to dip toes into the water for those who have not done so before. The fact remains, however, that all the fear mongering about international and emerging markets has not kept both from out-performing domestic stocks in quite a few actively-managed funds. This is especially true with international-EAFE stocks. Emerging market index funds are doing quite well, and a number of actively-managed funds in that category are also good. For many investors, it may be appropriate to consider looking at options with relatively low volatility.
I think in a "diversified" portfolio, if we think 30% allocation should be international, then 20% of that perhaps should be emerging markets. So as an example, out of a $100,000 portfolio, $6,000 should be in emerging markets.
Do any of us have more in emerging markets, now or at any other point? I have some money in MALOX and PASDX in my retirement accounts that's meaningful. I own some GPROX and PLMDX also. My meaningful positions are MACSX and MAPIX. I don't think I'm even 3% in emerging markets. Need to check.