Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

SEC Must End Mutual Fund Paper Chase

FYI: Even amidst the rancor and divisiveness that currently blanket Washington, the federal government has a bipartisan opportunity to reduce costs and improve disclosures for investors, while in the process helping the environment, and eliminating expensive, unnecessary papershuffling. Unfortunately, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) struck out on an opportunity to get it done at its public meeting last month.
Regards,
Ted
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2016/11/03/sec-must-end-mutual-fund-paper-chase/print/

Comments

  • I for one am not surprised at all. I have never seen any action by the SEC, DOL or other agency that reduces paperwork, lowers overall expenses, and makes sense. At least 50% of my daily mail consists of hard copies of prospectuses and other required mailings that end up in our shred/recycle bin. What a waste of resources and money!
  • I disagree. XBRL was an initiative that reduced costs.

    Nick de Peyster
    http://undervaluedstocks.info/
Sign In or Register to comment.