Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Scott Burns: To See The Problem, Turn To Appendix F, Page 212

TedTed
edited July 2016 in Off-Topic
FYI: The Social Security and Medicare Trustees reports, released last month, came and went faster than a bad sitcom. One day they were news. The next day no one remembered, a casualty of the Brexit vote.

But those reports are much more important for Americans than the Brexit vote. Retired, working, or still in school, you should be concerned. Two massive, vital and successful government programs are in trouble. They are in trouble today. They will be in more trouble tomorrow.
Regards,
Ted
https://assetbuilder.com/knowledge-center/articles/to-see-the-problem-turn-to-appendix-f-page-212

Comments

  • edited July 2016
    Yes, its going to get worse. Especially as robots (who contribute NOTHING to payroll taxes ) increasingly replace work-age humans who do.

    Some ideas:
    Authorize & require Medicare to negotiate drug pricing, like govt health ministries in other developed countries do. Allow those lower negotiated prices to be valid for ALL health plans in the USA (employer-provided, ACA, or individual).

    Levy payroll-taxes on the imputed-value of the labor of imported equipment/merchandise. Ditto for the value of offshore service-labor (i.e. call centers, etc) used to service the domestic economy. – Companies which offshore labor should not be able to offshore the tax burden. Such taxes are not ‘discriminatory’ as on-shore labor pays them. The tax as it is currently limited to onshore labor is discriminatory against US residents. If a for-profit business chooses to sell into/service the US economy using non-US residents, they should not get a tax incentive to do so.

    Where automation has replaced jobs, rather than making workers more efficient, amend the tax code, requiring companies to register such “automatons”, deny tax-depreciation of those assets, AND levy payroll-taxes on the imputed human labor which has been displaced. Automatons displacing humans should not be taxed lighter than the human beings being replaced.
  • @Edmond- You've made some very interesting suggestions there, and I wouldn't be totally surprised to see some of them eventually make their way into the system.
Sign In or Register to comment.