Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

John Waggoner: Mutual Fund Born During Great Depression Proves The Value Of Buy-And-Hold

FYI: If you want to convince your clients that doing nothing is sometimes the best thing to do, point them to Voya Corporate Leaders Trust (LEXCX).

Now in its 81st year, the fund has beaten the Standard and Poor's 500 stock index the past 15 years, according to Morningstar, the Chicago investment analyst. Voya Corporate Leaders is up an average 7.75% a year, vs. 5.58% for the S&P 500 index. Voya proudly proclaims on its website that the fund has beaten the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average "for over 40 years."
Regards,
Ted
http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20160610/FREE/160619995?template=printart

M* Snapshot LEXCX:
http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/LEXCX/quote.html

Lippper Snapshot LEXCX:
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/Fund/LEXCX

LEXCX Is Ranked #60 In The (LCV) Fund Category By U.S. News & World Report:
http://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/large-value/voya-corporate-leaders-trust-fund/lexcx

Oldest Mutual Funds:
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/oldestmutualfunds.asp

A Brief History Of The Mutual Fund:
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/mutualfund/05/mfhistory.asp

Comments

  • While LEXCX is a very good fund, and it shows that excellent investing can be done with low expenses and very low turnover with plenty of patience, I think the picture is not quite as rosy as the blurb above hints at. While it has beaten its benchmark (which is more than most active fund managers can say) over the last 15 years, it has not done it every year. It slightly underperformed in 2012, 2013, 2014, and significantly underperformed in 2009 and 2015. The period can be summarized as "mostly outperform". But the 12 years prior (as far back as my data goes) is a "mostly underperform" period. LEXCX is better than most funds I track.
  • I'm likely the only one who cares about this, but LEXCX is not a mutual fund. It is a unit investment trust (albeit organized under the 1940 Investment Company Act, like mutual funds). IMHO it is much closer to a HOLDR than to a mutual fund (in the sense of portfolio construction, not legal structure).

    Here's a column discussing the different structures of investments (in the context of ETFs):
    https://www.merrilledge.com/article/is-etf-really-a-fund-maybe-not

    LEXCX is unmanaged. That is an attribute of a UIT, in contrast to a mutual fund (even an index fund). The Sponsor (currently Voya Investments) has the responsibility of complying with the rules of the trust (e.g. dealing with mergers and spinoffs). The Trust is set to terminate on Nov. 30, 2100, or when its last portfolio security goes poof!

    There is no table of expenses, no SAI. (The trust agreement provides that the sponsor be paid 0.40% of AUM for doing no management, just caretaking. Not even holding the securities - a separate Trustee gets a separate fee for that.)

    I'm not saying this vehicle hasn't done well. Just that it isn't a mutual fund, and like HOLDRs will gradually become more and more concentrated. (It started with 30 companies, and is down to 22).
  • edited June 2016
    I like the idea of LEXCX (and owned it at one time) but a M*-reported 0.53 ER for an unmanaged fund is outrageous.
  • This has largely already been explicated going back two years, by DS and others, if not going back to Weitz, IIRC.
Sign In or Register to comment.