Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Comments

  • I'm frankly surprised some company was interested, except for the large base on which to charge fees. (Oh, gee, that must be it.) So much for great shareholder services.
  • Come on, Bob... "The object was to continue to use an open-architecture client offering"... it says so right there! (Don't you just love it?)
  • Hi OJ,

    I read something similar somewhere regarding "open-architecture client offering" but I recall a reference about bending over or such....; perhaps I read about it in a medical journal and proctology.

    Catch
  • edited April 2012
    I believe that you may be referring to "open-asset" procedures... very similar to "open-architecture"...
Sign In or Register to comment.