Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Should Fund Managers Get Paid For Performance?

FYI: (Click On Article Title At Top Of Google Search)
It’s no secret that active management has been a tough sell recently. Yes, there are talented managers who justify their higher fees, but investors increasingly aren’t willing to take that gamble. Last year investors pulled $207 billion out of active funds, according to Morningstar, and plowed $414 billion into passive portfolios.

So here’s an idea: Why don’t active managers walk the talk? Charge a minimal fixed fee “to keep the lights on,” says Andrew Clare, a professor of asset management and associate dean at Cass Business School in London. Then add a performance-based fee that rewards them for beating their benchmark and penalizes them when they don’t. Under the typical flat-fee structure used by most mutual funds, investors pay the same fee (as a percentage of assets) regardless of how their funds fare.
Regards,
Ted
https://www.google.com/#q=should+fund+managers+be+paid+for+perfprmance
Sign In or Register to comment.