Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Lipper: The Month In Closed-End Funds: January 2016

FYI: For the third consecutive month equity CEFs and fixed income CEFs on average suffered
downside performance on a NAV basis (-5.86% and -0.03%, respectively) for January,
while for the second month in a row equity CEFs posted a negative return on a market
basis (-6.69%) and fixed income CEFs (+0.15%) posted a plus-side market-based return.
Regards,
Ted
http://lipperalpha.financial.thomsonreuters.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/FMIR-US-CE-M-20160131-TR-JT.pdf

Comments

  • edited February 2016
    p.3:
    Despite the municipal bond CEFs dominance during the month, only one of the five top-performing individual CEFs in the fixed income universe was housed in Lipper’s General Municipal Bond CEFs macro-classification. At the top of the group was MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (NYSE: CIF, housed in the High Yield [Leveraged] CEFs classification), returning 5.04% and traded at a 12.75 discount on January 29. CIF was followed by DoubleLine Funds: DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (NYSE: DBL, warehoused in the General Bond CEFs classification), returning 3.07% and traded at a 7.94% discount at month end.
    NO, DBL traded at a premium at month-end, as it has been for quite awhile, and that premium is now over 10%.
Sign In or Register to comment.