Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

  • bee December 2015
Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Scott Burns: Another Big Win For Reverse Mortgages

FYI: In the vast universe of consumer borrowing, reverse mortgages get little respect. They cause the same kind of eyebrow lift as pawn tickets, car title loans, rent-to-own TV sets and leased car tires. When I write about them, the next day’s mail has chiding notes suggesting that I failed to tell the gruesome downside of reverse mortgages.
Regards,
Ted
https://assetbuilder.com/knowledge-center/articles/another-big-win-for-reverse-mortgages

Comments

  • beebee
    edited December 2015
    Anyone here feels this point (quoted from the article) is worth considering?

    "the cost of getting a reverse mortgage is higher than the cost of getting a conventional mortgage. But it’s lower than the cost of guaranteed minimum benefit products offered by insurance companies and you can be certain that every dime of reverse mortgage income will be tax-free. The income from financial products may be partially, or entirely, taxable, depending on its original source."

    Do these reverse mortgage payments provide enough income to outweigh the growing costs of property taxes and home maintenance?
Sign In or Register to comment.