Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

When It Comes To Consumer Spending, There’s Automobiles, And Everything Else. Why Is that?

TedTed
edited December 2015 in Off-Topic
FYI: Have a look at retail sales . They have been fairly soft , disappointing, or whatever measured phrases like “OK, not terrible, but not great” that analysts and commentators favor to indicate mediocrity. Nearly all consumer spending reports [ are showing soft to flat data.

There is one notable exception, however, and that’s automobiles . Cars and light trucks purchased for homes and businesses are selling at a record pace — a run rate of more than 18 million vehicles this calendar year.
Regards,
Ted
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2015/12/when-it-comes-to-consumer-spending-theres-automobiles-and-everything-else-why-is-that/print/

Comments

  • edited December 2015
    Life after Liftoff: Election Year Outlook
    By Diane C. Swonk, Chief Economist and Senior Managing Director Mesirow Financial
    Themes on the Economy
    Consumers Shine
    Consumer spending is expected to remain
    a primary driver of growth. The quantity and quality of jobs has picked up as wages
    appear to be firming

    The scars
    from the Great Recession are deep. The
    electorate still has many reasons not to trust
    government officials.

    Implications for November
    ..The unemployment rate is expected
    to plummet to the low 4% range by the
    time of the election, well below the Fed’s
    current 4.9% estimate for full employment.
    That, coupled with a modest improvement
    in the participation rate over the course of
    the next year, should lift overall confidence.
    I would not be surprised to see consumer
    attitudes move back into the range we saw
    in the mid-2000s. That is not great, nor is
    it bad, just better than it has been. The scars
    from the Great Recession are deep. The
    electorate still has many reasons not to trust
    government officials.
    ..My greater concern as an economist is what
    the election and the politics leading up to
    it will mean for the Federal Reserve. And,
    no, this is not about how the Fed will react
    to an election year; historically, the FOMC
    has gone out of its way to separate monetary
    policy decisions from election-year
    shenanigans. The year 2016, however, is
    unique in that politicians from both sides
    of the aisle would like to clip the Fed’s wings
    and limit its independence. Any outcome
    of the election that allows Congress to
    control monetary policy would be a disaster.
    Countries that gave up their central banks’
    independence are train wrecks. Ask Argentina.
    The process has already begun. Congress
    raided the coffers of the Federal Reserve to
    find revenues for the Highway Trust Fund, a
    dangerous precedent.

    2016 Outlook
    Domestically Driven Growth
    . Real GDP is expected to reaccelerate
    after a lull in the second half of the year.
    The household sector is expected to pick up
    where the corporate sector left off; what was
    once a Wall Street-centric expansion will
    finally reach Main Street.
    Consumers Shine
    Consumer spending is expected to remain
    a primary driver of growth. The quantity and quality of jobs has picked up as wages
    appear to be firming. Entry-level wages,
    which were among the hardest hit by the
    crisis, are finally starting to pick up as
    increases in the minimum wage at the state
    and local levels are pushing up wages for
    lower-skilled workers. A shortfall in cheap
    immigrant labor is also expected to boost
    wages for manual workers
    Bottom Line
    We can finally say “good-bye” to one of the
    defining characteristics of the post-crisis
    era: near-zero interest rates. The bet is that
    the economy is strong enough to sustain
    somewhat higher rates, a change to welcome
    rather than shun.
    https://www.mesirowfinancial.com/economics/swonk/themes/themes_1215.pdf


    Related/Trigger Warning . Washington Post Editorial
    Washington Post: Hold the applause for gimmicky highway bill
    First Published Dec 08 2015 04:15PM
    Congress did not embrace the obvious solution. Instead, lawmakers resorted to a variety of gimmicks, one-time funding sources and flat-out bad policies to raise the $70 billion they needed to supplement revenue from a frozen gas tax.

    The government will sell several billion dollars' worth of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It will divert money from airline and cruise ship passenger customs fees. Most concerning, the bill shakes down the Federal Reserve. The Fed already remits most of what it earns on its holdings to the treasury, keeping a share to preserve its ability to weather losses and respond to potential crises without printing money. That system has worked well. Now lawmakers will raid the Fed's surplus account to fund infrastructure and will cap the amount the Fed can hold in the future. Not only is this a poor offset — the government wouldn't be raising any new money, just moving it from one federal entity with funding needs to another — it is also an awful precedent. The Fed should have the independence to operate with the financial buffer it deems necessary. Its reserves should not be used in a legislative funding shell game.
    http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/3265696-155/washington-post-hold-the-applause-for
  • "Most concerning, the bill shakes down the Federal Reserve. The Fed already remits most of what it earns on its holdings to the treasury, keeping a share to preserve its ability to weather losses and respond to potential crises without printing money. That system has worked well. Now lawmakers will raid the Fed's surplus account to fund infrastructure and will cap the amount the Fed can hold in the future. Not only is this a poor offset — the government wouldn't be raising any new money, just moving it from one federal entity with funding needs to another — it is also an awful precedent. The Fed should have the independence to operate with the financial buffer it deems necessary. Its reserves should not be used in a legislative funding shell game."

    YES!!
  • Guess who draft the Highway Bill?

    Interestingly, the term shakes down is used above. It is often reserves for organized crime.
Sign In or Register to comment.