Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

What Is ‘Underweight’ Or ‘Overweight’?

FYI: When you hear market strategists use the words “underweight” and “overweight,” what exactly do they mean?
Regards,
Ted
http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-is-underweight-or-overweight-in-the-market-1430709410

Comments


  • They're both just someone's opinion. Doesn't really mean much to me in my investing decisions.

    Maybe you can interpret it as 'skewing' an allocation toward/against something (and from that glean some potentially useful 'Street consensus' maybe) --- but as with most Wall Street 'analysis' you might be better off asking a Magic Eight Ball for guidance.
  • edited May 2015
    Huh? Article is exceptionally sketchy. I guess Simon's purpose was simply to define a term.

    He alludes to "benchmarks." What is not very clear is that one's benchmark for a given asset varies tremendously depending on factors like goals, risk tolerance, age, etc.

    At age 85, I'd consider a 50% allocation to equities to be overweight. At age 25, I'd consider the same allocation underweight. An investment or fund manager may set a benchmark for any asset, not just equities. Some managers benchmark gold, Treasuries, real estate, etc.

    Most mutual fund Prospectuses lay out some type of benchmark for the various assets it may hold - though the exact terminology differs.
  • with my Dr.: its overweight @190# under 180#...for me..
    investing: it means nothing....to me
  • Thanks Tampa Bay, but you've got the wrong wrong thread.

    See the one on McDonalds.:)
Sign In or Register to comment.