Any reason you would choose one over the other? I was really impressed with David's write-up about SCMFX from a few years ago and I like the more reasonable expense ratio, but the performance and volatility are very close to one another. The downside in 2008 was very similar. DHMCX has 6 times more AUM and 62 holdings rather than 35 but neither is running into any issues with size. Or is there another small/mid-cap value leaning fund you'd prefer? Many of the others I'm aware of and find appealing (relatively focused portfolios, smaller AUM, manager with a really good record, good alpha as I'm not so worried about volatility except in the extreme, reasonable expenses) are closed.
Comments
This is a tough space to fill...one that I struggle with as well. I'm linking 2 threads on this same issue. SCMFX plus VASVX are the options I've narrowed it down to.
Good luck, and let us know what you decide,
Press
http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/5469/small-and-mid-cap-fund-recommendations#latest
http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/13679/help-requested-sc-mc-value-funds#latest
The previous posts were spirited as always and its clear there are a variety of opinions. VASVX was on my list as well but I was turned off a little by the AUM and the large-cap growth exposure as well, which is certainly not what I'm looking for.
I agree being comfortable with the manager is a top criteria, but the style box is of some, not all, importance to me as well because my specific objective at the moment is to shift my allocation a bit more towards value.
Right now I'm leaning towards SCMFX but I still have some time to do more research so if I stumble on anything I like more I'll post it.
Regards,
Ted