Yesterday I noticed that RiverPark's June 30 fund fact sheet for RSIVX/RSIIX shows data that (to my knowledge, anyway) they haven't put in a document before: go to
the fund page and click on "Fund Fact Sheet" to see the PDF.
They show the credit ratings for the holdings now, and it is pretty junky - 19% investment grade, 4% BB, 29% B, 39% CCC, and 7% unrated. It took a small hit during the recent credit risk-off days, but not as much as OSTIX did, for example.
So I'm thinking short junk does appear to be the personality, and the portfolio slot where it belongs.
Comments
This fund is coming up on one year in existence. You will need more time before classifying it.
http://osterweis.com/files/Fixed_Income_Outlook_2Q14a.pdf
Within the past year I sold PAUAX & MFLDX ... but, I held on to PASAX.
PASAX is now the thrid best performing fund within its hybrid income sleeve ytd in my portfolio. One of the reasons that I decided to hold on to it was that it pays a quarterly distribution that was in the four percent range and I felt that I was getting paid while it was positioned to the fast moving market currents. Where as PAUAX and MFLDX do not make quarterly distributions and there was nothing there to recieve in the form of a distribution while I waited for a turn around.. With this, I elected to moved on.
Old_Skeet
However, he goes on to write "...a substantial percentage of the holdings in both funds are invested in below investment grade securities. Therefore, arguably the funds have above average credit risk. Our strategy to maneuver in current markets is founded in the belief that by staying small and nimble that we can take advantage of special situations where our perception of credit risk is different than the market or ratings agencies."
Once it gets three years under its belt, I would imagine RSIVX/RSIIX will have excellent standard deviation/return, Sharpe and Sortino ratings.
The only gripe - and it's a big one - is its expense ratio.
My bad, seems that PAUAX does make a quartely distribution.
Old_Skeet