Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Comments

  • MJG
    edited May 2014
    Hi Ted,

    Thank you for yet another article that addresses the forecasters ability to forecast. That is a topic that greatly interests me.

    I never doubt that forecasters love to forecast. The challenge is to keep score on the accuracy of those forecasts.

    I posted on this exact subject a few days earlier than the article that you referenced. The article uses many of the same data references that I used. Perhaps my submittal inspired the piece you located.

    Phil Tetlock’s research on this matter is exhaustive in scope. Here is my internal Link to my posting on the topic:

    http://www.mutualfundobserver.com:80/discuss/discussion/13113/the-reliability-of-expert-forecasting#latest

    If MFOers are interested, I recommend that you consider a video interview with Tetlock that I referenced. For completeness, here is the Link to that video:

    http://edge.org/conversation/how-to-win-at-forecasting

    Enjoy.

    A more rigorous ongoing examination of expert’s accuracy in a long-term prediction tournament organized by Tetlock is partially completed. It’s funded by the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency (IARPA). Some super-predictors have been identified and they have been grouped together to test if team performance can be enhanced. A provisional finding is that, to a limited extent with exercises and training, scores can be improved.

    Best Regards.
Sign In or Register to comment.