It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
The implication here is that the PRWCX's December div, or more generally any div, increases total return. However, a security's price is reduced by the amount of the div (aside from market fluctuations on the ex-day), netting zero change in total return.PRCWX traditionally lags its peers further and further as the year goes on, then distributes a massive dividend and CG payout in December, putting it squarely back in the pre-tax Total Return lead.
https://www.dividend.com/dividend-education/how-do-mutual-funds-pay-dividendsA mutual fund’s net asset value is the total value of all securities held by the fund. All dividends and interest payments earned by the fund initially become part of the fund’s total net asset value and would, therefore, increase the fund’s daily NAV. A dividend distribution made by the fund would be removing assets from a fund’s NAV. When a dividend distribution is made, the fund’s daily NAV would be reduced by the amount of the distribution.
I don't think the above chart is correct. M* shows for 5 years that PRWCX made 73.4% and WVENX made 58.9Even with quarterly dividends compounding, Wellington gets trounced by Giroux's fund. So do most, if not all other 60/40 allocation funds.
https://www.dpfaber.com/PRWCX-VWENX-chart.jpg

In the past I've signed my credit card. 'Sign Here', 'Ask For Signature', and one time 'Alfred E Neuman.' At no time did anyone challenge the signature even when they quickly flipped the card over to see "if it had been signed."
Does anyone sign the back of credit cards these days?
I bet you could sign "Mickey Mouse" every time you're asked to sign and never get questioned. Nobody ever looks at them. Total waste of time. IMHO
Umm. Yes. I guess. Their online trading platform directs you to call and confirm what you already know. Like I said, if selling from 1 or 2 funds I’ve learned to ignore it. You can easily pull up your history and see if you owe an early redemption fee. In this case, I pulled from 5 different funds and was reluctant not to follow the instructions. I didn’t feel when I called, however, that they really wanted me to call. I thought they seemed a bit irked that I called re such a mundane issue. But - I might be wrong on that.@hankI don't consider this as 'bad; but that the company trying to be helpful, no?.Fido has an issue where you get a pop-up when you sell a fund saying “If you think you may be entitled to a fee wavier
+1Low Tech, I think that the other members are saying that the interest rate that you are getting today on your MM funds might not (and probably won't if you look at the past) last forever. In that case, what would your alternative plans be?
I'm a buy-and-holder, but that doesn't mean the same thing forever. Here's the key: "Conditions change."
As things are now, you could put $1M in a money fund and get over $50k a year in interest with no price fluctuation. A few years ago that wouldn't work. A few years from now that may not work either, or it could go up even more, a lot more.
I already answered that three posts above yours. Is everybody here illiterate? And several posts above that I said: "Conditions will surely change -- but we don't know when or in which direction -- adjust as necessary."Low Tech, I think that the other members are saying that the interest rate that you are getting today on your MM funds might not (and probably won't if you look at the past) last forever. In that case, what would your alternative plans be?
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla