It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Thank you very much. Sorry for the trouble. I was only looking for the 74/6/20 info but appreciate the additional detail you included.@BaluBalu
I provided as much detail as I ever have/intend to provide online about our portfolio at this thread:
https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/comment/177280/#Comment_177280
Here's an update to our Market Portfolio (MP) after our last two rounds of exchanges last Friday and today:
The MP is (now 11 OEFs with sale of NEAGX today):
Stocks/Bonds/Cash: 74/6/20
Domestic/Foreign: 90/10
Technology Allocation: 32
MAG 7 Allocation: 25
LC/MC/SC: 77/20/3
V/B/G: 16/33/51
Suggest taking a look at my post on the linked thread and with a little massaging of the data there and here you should be able to ballpark the answer to your question.
I kindly ask that any follow up comments or questions about our two ports be done via PM. Thx.
I can't agree with you, with exception to the ER. I invest in a few Baird and Vanguard municipal bond funds. Two are BMQIX and VWIUX which I consider similar. Over any time period since BMQIX has existed, it's returns have been superior to VWIUX. I have no problem paying 30 basis points for BMQIX vs 9 for VWIUX.for baird :
how can they justify triple the ER when solid quasi-active bond fund\etfs from vanguard do just as well on most/all long term metrics? (and have looked deeply into muni)
they have very low I-shares minimums for all bond funds, but is there any benefit for becoming a large (50k,100k,250k) fundholder?
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla