Savita Subramanian: large cap value is the place to be for the next five years Subramanian is head of US equity and quantitative strategy at Bank of America, and was the kickoff speaker for the conference. She made three sorts of arguments:
1. most market forecast models are completely useless. BoA has reviewed their performance and they have an R-squared of zero. That is, there is zero predictive validity in them. (Which models, exactly? For what time frames? Doesn't say, presumably because they would only slow things down.)
In addition, most strategists are contrarian indicators; the more they are enthused, the worse the market's forward returns. BoA has a timing model based on that: they survey strategies for their recommended equity exposure in a balanced portfolio. BoA has discovered that the best buy signal is when the average recommendation drops below 51.3% and the best sell signal is when it hits 58%. They survey 20 strategists monthly (I believe) and the current rec is about 55%, which she describes as providing a lack of guidance.
(What, you ask, is the genesis of this model? She seems not to know where it came from; she inherited it from her predecessor, Rich Bernstein, and suspects that he inherited it from his predecessor. What is that R-squared of BoA's model? No hint. And since she had a schedule conflict and had to leave right after her talk rather than do the promising Q&A with journalists.)
2. the market is in a good place just now. Traditional valuation metrics are all wrong since they're premised on an economy that no longer exists. Dynamic industries are asset-light, so book value is largely meaningless. Subscriptions have replaced sales. Inflation at 2-4% is positive for equities. Inflows are strong. The equity risk premium is historically low. US companies have been replacing people with AI which is good because "people are risky, processes are predictable." (Climate change doesn't exist, elections don't matter, we're on a permanently high plateau for ... sorry, that's an editorial aside.)
3. large cap value is the coming sweet spot. Pensions and hedge fund have become dramatically underweight publicly traded equities in favor of private equity, but the attraction of the latter is fading as correlations rise and gains are arbitraged away. In particular, she projects that boomers will need income, that fixed-income isn't attractive (we recently reached, she reports, a 5,000 year low in interest rates), and so there will be a migration to equity-income strategies centered on dividend-paying stocks. Prior to 2013, 50% of equity returns came from dividends (a troubled statement depending on the time-frame since, as she notes above, the economy has changed) and that might recur. Meta and Alphabet are both looking to initiate dividends, a sign of big tech growth stocks are maturing into more traditional corporations. Some IPOs have even played with the idea of incorporating a dividend into their initial offering (my head hurts). Sectors like energy (companies that are now rewarding their executives for decarbonizing and cash return rather than on meeting production targets), tech and financials stand to benefit.
Fidelity Rewards Signature Card? Fidelity’s card has arrived. Plenty of available credit. Haven’t gotten around to activating it yet. The paperwork that came along says no interest on purchases until around the end of December 2025. Have contracted to have a major landscape / outdoor infrastructure project done this summer. Around $20K - but could go a bit higher. I called the contractor today and they will take the card and do not charge a convenience fee. Sounds too good to be true,
Being very conservative (and taking a simplistic look), 20K invested for 12 months @ 5% = $1,000
Then there’s the 2% cash-back that will go into my CM account. That’s another $400
So it looks on the surface like an easy $1400 gain on a 20K charge. More importantly to me, it would allow time to stagger distributions from my IRAs (the ultimate funding source) over a 12 month period. Not worried about a potential near-term “hit” to credit rating, as I rarely use credit.
- What I don’t know is whether there are minimum monthly payments required starting with month #1. I would certainly expect there are. Any thoughts what that monthly payment might be on a 20K balance?
- Re the 2% “cash back” … Is that by chance considered taxable income?
- Exactly when does that 2% cash-back get deposited anyway? End of monthly billing cycle? Would it still work even along with the free credit offer?
- If you returned an item 60 days after buying it for a merchant refund back to your card, would Fidelity need to go into your CM account and withdraw the 2% cash back credit?
And thank you to all of you for all the ideas and suggestions the thread generated!
Will anyone be taking Schwad up on Transfer deal ? I did (not for $
5M - I wish!). Schwab told me that the higher bonus dollar amounts were for transfers from Fidelity but not from Vanguard. Was the offer you received for transfers from anywhere (or even better, from multiple sources combined)?
Since I had just closed my Vanguard accounts, I used Schwab as a replacement for Vanguard, not as a place in lieu of Fidelity, which I still use.
If the objective is to maximize bonus dollar value, one can use Merrill and/or E*Trade as
additional receptacles for assets. With Merrill you can harvest another $1K bonus for a $2
50K transfer (any combo of sources) for up to two accounts (total $2K) - one taxable, one IRA. With E*Trade, you can get $
5K for just $1.
5M in assets, but this must be into a taxable account.
Holding periods are different with each promotion. Schwab requires assets to remain for a year, Merrill 90 days, and E*Trade 6 months.
https://www.merrilledge.com/offers/pr1000https://us.etrade.com/what-we-offer/how-it-works/promo
Will anyone be taking Schwad up on Transfer deal ? Oh darn, I wish my $5M were at Vanguard an unloved brokerage. I could use another $6K this year.
Will anyone be taking Schwad up on Transfer deal ? I just transferred my Vanguard taxable account to Schwab (considerably < $5M!).
The transfer completed yesterday.
Contacted Schwab last night because there were a few discrepancies.
Vanguard may be responsible for these discrepancies.
Need to contact Schwab later today to dig deeper...
Edit/Add:
Vanguard did not transfer fractional shares for my ETF yesterday.
It sold the fractional shares earlier today.
The proceeds of the ETF sale plus residual cash equals the discrepancy amount.
Buy Sell Why: ad infinitum. Sold shares of two VG index funds yesterday and today to bring Market Portfolio stock allocation down to low end of range. Parking latest proceeds in VMRXX paying 5.29%. Swung for the fences in 1st half of 2024 and did better than projected. Simply booking gains over the past few days and reducing stock exposure and portfolio volatility. For first time since starting investing in 1980, effectively treating 2024 as an act in two parts, as I'm thinking things may start getting dicey in route to November.
Will anyone be taking Schwad up on Transfer deal ? I just received the offer this morning. $6K for 5 million transfer of cash or other. Lesser amounts available. Starts at $300 for $50K transfer.
Vanguard PRIMECAP Reopens interesting to note that vhcax, the 3rd primecap vanguard fund w/admiral fees, has not reopened.
its largest holding, lilly @$2.5b in value, is bigger than the next 4 combined.
if i had to guess one secret sauce for primecap and giroux, its avoiding sentiment plays from the onset but letting business winners run.
If you look at the top 10 or 20 holdings, they were first purchased 20 years ago. And per M*, the turnover is 6%.
Vanguard PRIMECAP Reopens interesting to note that vhcax, the 3rd primecap vanguard fund w/admiral fees, has not reopened.
its largest holding, lilly @$2.5b in value, is bigger than the next 4 combined.
if i had to guess one secret sauce for primecap and giroux, its avoiding sentiment plays from the onset but letting business winners run.
Fund Allocations (Cumulative), 5/31/24 Fund Allocations (Cumulative),
5/31/24
Notable shifts into stocks. The changes for OEFs + ETFs were based on a total AUM of about $34.
59 trillion in the previous month, so +/- 1% change was about +/- $34
5.9 billion. Also note that these changes were from both fund inflows/outflows & price changes. #ICI #Funds #OEFs #ETFs
OEFs & ETFs: Stocks 60.
59%, Hybrids 4.
53%, Bonds 17.88%, M-Mkt 17.01%
https://ybbpersonalfinance.proboards.com/post/1533/thread
Let's gamble, says IBKR $5 -$10 player at crap table. Think I'll stay away.
LUV: Huh? What? Don’t get megoing on the airlines …
- Of 3 trips since the first of December I’ve been boarded and then taxied and returned to the terminal 4 times.
- On a 5th we got within a couple hundred miles of the final destination (home) and turned back to land at the departing airport (ORD) due to mechanical problems.
- On one the departing flight was cancelled at 1 PM and checked luggage returned. But the flight then departed at 8 PM.
- On 2 of those 3 trips I was stranded overnight in Chicago after the first flight landed anywhere between 5 and 8 hours late causing a missed connection.
- On one (into Key West) the incoming flights were so backed up we waited 90 minutes to get off the sweltering plane out on the tarmac.
- On one, after we’d taxied back to the gate for mechanical issues, a woman ahead of me in first class began screaming at the male flight attendant: “I want another drink. Bring me a drink now!” But he refused to jump rope at her command. Settled down only after he threatened to bring the plane’s skipper back to talk to her. I believe I’ve since seen this woman several times on Bloomberg being interviewed about stocks. Very important Wall Street person (at a big investment bank).