Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • The 20- Year Performance Of Hedge Funds And The S&P 500 Are Almost Identical
    Not sure if the title is suppose to be negative towards Hedge funds, but market like returns with 1/2 the volatility seems pretty good to me. Max drawdowns appear to be much less for the Hedge fund index than for the S&P500. All good.
    I recently stepped into the Hedge Fund arena with the purchase of RGHVX.
  • "Defensive" funds?
    Hi, Bitzer!
    If by "defensive" you mean "weakly correlated to the stock market," you might benefit by thinking about how equity-oriented funds minimize their correlation.
    Some choose to short individual stocks, which allows them to maintain an effective (called "net") exposure that might be in the 40-60% range. Representative of such funds is ASTON/River Road Long-Short (ARLSX), LS Opportunity (LSOFX), RiverPark Long-Short Opportunities (RLSFX) and Wasatch Long-Short (FMLSX).
    Some choose to sell options which generate income and rise in value, generally, when volatility is climbing. Representative of such funds is RiverNorth Dynamic Buy-Write (RNBWX), RiverPark Gargolye Hedged Value (RGHVX) and Bridgeway Managed Volatility (BRBPX).
    Some choose to maintain high cash balances when the market does not represent a screaming buy. Representative funds include Bretton Fund (BRTNX), Cook and Bynum (COBYX), Pinnacle Value (PVFIX), all of the F P A funds (including Crescent and International Value), and Tilson Dividend (TILDX).
    Some, of course, have hybrid stock/bond portfolios. I'd be cautious there about anything holding a bond portfolio with a maturity of more than five years. You could do worse than a fund like Greenspring (GRSPX) or Osterweis Strategic Investment (OSTVX).
    Each approach has its special drawbacks and none are pure magic, but any of the strategies might work to help you find a long-term holding that you might choose to enlarge when your anxiety climbs.
    For what it's worth,
    David
  • Scott - Where's your thread "Where are you investing now"?
    I've made a few changes over the last couple months:
    I had ARIVX as my only small cap fund. I took half of that and put it in GPGOX.
    Sold half my PIMIX and put it in PRWBX.
    40% of my portfolio has been in balanced or allocation type funds. I have or am in the process of moving some of that money around. I'm selling my 5% stake in PGDPX (to heavy HY bonds going forward) and halving my 10% stake in PAUIX. Again, another fund that plays to much with bonds. With that money I already started investing in RGHVX. New, but pretty impressive so far. The rest I plan to move to FPACX, increasing that percentage from 10 to 15%.
    mrc70, thanks for starting the thread. Always interested to hear what others are doing.
  • Thoughts on Long/Short Fund
    Reply to @JohnChisum: I'm skeptical about any fund that proposes a constant long/short philosophy. I much prefer a fund like FPACX that gives a proven manager the latitude to invest where he sees the best opportunities in a given economic environment.
    That said, I recently started moving out of PAUIX and putting that money into RGHVX. M* calls this fund L/S, but if you look at it's portfolio profile, at this time there is no short. The fund has been profiled by David. The fund is a combination of a stock portfolio and an options portfolio. I'll admit, I don't totally understand the fund, but I was impressed that the managers and their families are heavily invested in the fund. It's had a great record out of the blocks. Before it was a mutual fund, the managers were successful hedge fund managers.
    FWIW; another S/L fund that has done very well this year is the whitebox fund WBLSX.
  • Assessing my watchlist of alternative funds
    Reply to @Maurice: Hi Maurice. Totally agree with you on not putting much value in the short time frame. The post was just a general observance over a particularly volatile last 3 months. It actually surprised me that many of these widely talked about alternative funds did so poorly.
    Limiting volatility and down side risk while achieving benchmark results is also my biggest investment goal. I also am not a fan of long-short funds. The only funds on the list that I actually invest in are FPACX, PAUIX. Also RGHVX at a very low percentage. RGHVX is a newly acquired fund.
  • Assessing my watchlist of alternative funds
    I have a M* watch list of alternative type funds. I'm intrigued by the idea of a fund being able to navigate different economic cycles to give steady positive results. The last 3 months, both the bond and stock markets have been pretty volatile. So short term results for these funds, though not a true testament of the fund, are pretty interesting. Charles could do a much better analysis the last 3 months, but here is some simple comparisons.
    I'll add VFINX as a market comparison and FPACX, one of my favorite funds where the manager has great flexibility. Ranked by best 1 month and worst 1 month.
    comps: 1m 3m
    VFINX -3.1 2.9
    FPACX -1.8 3.0
    best: 1m 3m
    HSGFX 2.4 0.4
    MFLDX -0.6 2.2
    WBLSX -0.8 2.1
    HSTRX -0.9 -6.5
    RGHVX -1.6 2.5
    worst: 1m 3m
    AQRIX -8.9 -9.6
    ABRIX -5.8 -5.4
    PAUDX -5.1 -5.9
    PRPFX -4.9 -8.1
    PASDX -4.8 -4.2
    others on my watch list that fell in the middle of best and worst: PGDPX, ARLSX
    My take-away from this is that the much talked about alternatives just didn't hold up (AQRIX, ABRIX, PAUDX, PRPFX). My favorite manager and fund, FPACX, did just fine, which makes me think why not just stick with the tried and true performer. I would never touch HSGFX again, just because it only does well in bear markets - but in this comparison it did well. MFLDX is a very nice alternative fund as many here have said in the past. And lastly, I bought into RGHVX after David's commentary on the fund. It has been relatively volatile, but looking back 1 and 3 months, has weathered the storm fairly well.
  • Still Holding !
    I wouldn't discredit the sell in May idea quiet yet. We still have a long hot summer to go and Mr. Market is down over the last month - some sectors down worst the others. As of yesterday, my REIT fund, CSRSX, is down over 1 month about 11%. My EM fund, ODVYX, down about 7%, which is actually not bad compared to most EM funds. Heck, even my bond funds are down in the 2-4% range.
    I bought a toe hold position in RGHVX last week. This is a hedge-type mutual fund that David profiled a little while back. It's holding up fairly well in this volatile market. I may take a little more of my bond money and add to RGHVX if I like what I see.
  • June 2012 update is posted
    "This month we begin by renewing the 2009 profile of a distinguished fund, Wasatch Long/ Short (FMLSX) and bringing a really promising newcomer, Aston / River Road Long- Short (ARLSX) onto your radar.
    Our plans for the months ahead include profiles of Aston/MD Sass Enhanced Equity (AMBEX), RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity (RLSFX), RiverPark/Gargoyle Hedged Value (RGHVX), James Long-Short (JAZZX), and Paladin Long Short (PALFX). If we’ve missed someone that you think of a crazy-great, drop me a line. I’m open to new ideas."
    There have been few successes in the long-short field in part because of the inflexibility of the funds - these were largely presented as "hedge funds for the masses", but in many cases are not flexible enough to be really functional in this market. They're just not hedge funds and if the funds are not "fully functional" in a way that can pull of the strategy, they disappoint . See the Rydex Managed Futures fund, which was "ahead of its time" as the first Managed Futures fund, but after it worked in 2008 when everything went in one direction, it has seemed broken ever since because of the fact that the long-short fund only repositions once a month (and I believe is sector specific - if it's short ag, it's short ag across the board rather than specific commodities.) Managed futures as a strategy has not been outstanding in the mutual fund space over the last few years, but a number of large managed futures hedge funds that are vastly more flexible have done fine. However, something that updates its positions once a month in this market is going to be continually off unless you get one long, continuous move either way.
    Additionally, many long-short funds often seem to take the long-short mentality too literally - those funds that can dial up and down risk with much greater flexibility (Marketfield, the Robeco fund) are the few that have held up better than the rest. Those who seem to continually have to be short with a good deal of the portfolio have not. Those who have tried to discuss fundamentals in a time of the easiest monetary policy in history (Hussman) have not. Nakoma, well...
    As for the James fund, didn't they have a Market Neutral fund that imploded not that long ago? That fund was down 28% between 11/08 and when it folded in June of last year.
    Look at what Leuthold Hedged equity turned into (or not.), as well. As for Leuthold....
    "I’ve been wondering, lately, whether there are better choices than Leuthold Global (GLBLX) for part of my non-retirement portfolio."
    Yes, yes there is. The Leuthold funds continue to be disappointing and I think it became clear that the hundreds of indicators that Leuthold was using were no longer all that functional in a market like this as maybe they used to be.
    I mean, from an article on hedge funds and being in a market where one "has to change algorithms":
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/21/us-trading-blackbox-idUSBRE84K07320120521
    "NEW ALGORITHMS
    In the middle of a trading floor overlooking the Thames, a huge screen flashes with the deals - everything from interest rate futures to oil contracts - made by AHL's black-box computer.
    The firm has recently had a rough ride: its portfolio fell almost 17 percent in 2009 and lost 6.8 percent last year when the fund's assets shrank 11 percent to $21 billion, dragging the share price of its parent, Man Group.
    "We've learned our lessons," says boss Tim Wong. The fund is now keenly aware of the need to pay attention to what its rivals may be doing, he says.
    But AHL isn't out to match Winton's ancient data - its chief scientist Anthony Ledford argues that modern markets behave very differently than they did 50 or 100 years ago. ************* Winton sends researchers to libraries and archives across the world to find numbers held in books and on microfilms. It has found barley and sesame prices from ancient Babylon, and English wheat prices going back to 1209. It now employs more than 90 researchers, including extragalactic astrophysicists, computer scientists and climatologists. The company hired a meteorologist who had researched the "El Nino" phenomenon.************** The physics graduate - Winton wants to keep his name secret for fear a rival might poach him - works in London correlating weather data to crops such as corn, wheat and soybeans. That data can be used to forecast how prices might fluctuate with the weather.
    Instead, it is sharpening up its processes. AHL has cut back its short-term algorithms, and is developing codes to profit from different market patterns away from trend-following - for example, betting on the fact that markets tend to iron out short-term anomalies over time, or revert to the mean.
    With volatility so high now, it is also developing new algorithms that try to predict, and trade on, the changing volatility of different assets.
    Its approach gets support from some investors.
    "The old CTAs are relying too much on the past," said Monty Agarwal, an author and founding partner of Managed Futures Fund, which invests in both its own and external CTAs. "The new strategies that we see thriving are mean reversion, which is trend anticipation, and pattern recognition - artificial intelligence."
    The funds know they need something new to generate 'alpha', or outperform the market. AHL's Ledford isn't sure whether short-term codes will ever work again. "It's either taken an extremely long time for the alpha to come back from those frequencies or it's not coming back," he said. "And I still don't know the answer to that."
    ---
    Or, as Lord Rothschild (or "Lord Vader", perhaps) simply said a couple of days ago, "Unless one has a long horizon, investment success in
    public markets has become a game of timing rather
    than fundamentals."
    You have an investment market where people have to research grain prices from ancient Babylon in order to try and get that extra leg up over their computer-driven competition. No comment really necessary.
    Overall, another really terrific article this month, and keep up the wonderful work with MFO.