Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • doughnuts
    The Growth fund paid a Short-Term Capital Gain Per Share of $0.92390
    & Long-Term Capital Gain Per Share $12.30854 (ouch!).
    http://meridianfund.com/index.php?cID=237
    It may not continue to pay large distribution amounts in the future. Was there a manager change (?) or possibly the huge run up in the markets would have contributed to the large payout. The Vanguard S&P 500 has a large potential for distribution, but has not paid anything for some time.
  • doughnuts
    I received a cap gain dist from my MERDX (Meridian growth fund) fund and I thought of this board and the question, Why did my fund price go down so much? I need to understand this better. I've owned this fund for 20 yrs. The last three it's paid a lot of cap gains and I have to pay taxes on that. I'm thinking of going to an index fund to try to lessen the tax liability. Does that make sense? Index funds don't sell off stocks as much? Thanks tip
  • A Conservative Asset Allocation For Income Focused Investors
    Just thinking out loud... Could one just allocate 30% of their $1M into ultra-safe FDIC insured laddered CDs and allow the other 70% the opportunity to keep up with inflation...maybe even appreciate from $700,000 to $1M over the next ten years...a 4% average return would get you there and could be completely deversified with just 2 ETFs...VT and VTI.
    At the 10 year mark, another 30% would be available to reallocated from the capital appreciation account to capital perservation/capital needs account?
    Additionally, in any year where returns on the capital appreciation account are greater than 4% the difference could be reallocated to the capital perservation account this might maintain a simple and continual rebalancing between the two accounts.
  • Why Retirees May Need To Tighten Their Belts
    Reply to @catch22:
    Stay safe Catch...my understanding is that the age RMD is triggered hasn't ever been adjusted upward, maybe it should be. Average age of death is now 78, not 74. Maybe RMD should be 74 for a 4 year recapture of taxes. Basically, tax need to be collected on tax deferred contributions and the potential growth of IRAs.
    I'm in the camp that the contribution should be taxed as earned income (which it would have been originally if it wasn't placed into an IRA), but the deferred growth in IRAs should be taxed more like it is in taxable accounts (as long term capital gains). Fairness is the key when it comes to taxation.
    RMD will shift dollars from IRA accounts into individual taxable accounts and government tax collection accounts.
  • date-targeted bond portfolio?
    Fidelity has also started a series of target date muni bond funds:
    https://www.fidelity.com/mutual-funds/news-analysis/defined-maturity-funds
    While I suspect that any of the funds mentioned would meet your needs, I believe none of them meet your stated requirement that they don't trade or sell bonds.
    The American Century funds are zero coupon funds. But because interest is imputed, they must distribute dividends. If all investors "let it ride" (reinvested the dividends), this would be a non-event (except for tax purposes), and the funds' portfolios would remain static. But if any investor were to take a dividend in cash, the fund would be forced to sell some bonds to pay out that dividend. This might explain the 40% turnover reported in the prospectus for the 2020 fund.
    Open end funds in general (this would include the Fidelity funds also) have portfolios that grow and shrink, as people buy more shares (by adding money, or simply reinvesting real - not phantom - interest payments from the bonds), or redeem them. The Fidelity 2019 fund reports a turnover of 4%. (Since turnover is the lesser of the purchases and sales, the low figure could be an artifact of people really holding to maturity and taking only interest payments, so there are virtually no redemptions/sales; in contrast, the AmCentury Zeros must redeem simply to pay out dividends, resulting in the higher turnover.)
    ETFs don't have "regular" investors buying shares, but they still have the problem of what to do with the interest received on the bonds in the portfolio. Like open end funds, they buy more bonds as the interest comes in. (Then they have to sell some bonds to pay out the quarterly or monthly dividends to shareholders.) Also, when the market price dips below the NAV, authorized participants make their move - buying shares on the open market, and redeeming them for the actual bonds in the portfolio. Thus the ETF is technically selling the bonds it gives to the authorized participants in exchange for shares. (It's not really much different from an open end fund redeeming shares, except that the payment for the shares is "in kind" - rather than selling the bonds and turning over cash to the former shareholder, the ETF skips the selling step and just hands the bonds over to the authorized participant.)
    The only investment structure I know of where there truly is no trading is a unit investment trust. The UIT sells a fixed number of shares (like a closed end fund), purchases bonds fitting a general profile described in the prospectus, and then holds the bonds until call or maturity. As the bonds make interest payments, these payments are passed through to the shareholders. As the bonds mature, the proceeds are likewise passed through to the shareholders. The portfolio may take a year or two to wind down, as the bonds don't necessarily mature altogether (especially if some are called early). Unlike a mutual fund (or ETF) that has flexibility to buy replacement bonds in the event of an early call, UITs just pay out the money a bit early.
    Does any of this matter? IMHO, only if you want to know exactly what's in the portfolio at all times, and only if you want something that almost exactly matches the bonds' returns, rather than approximating it (fairly well), due to inflows/outflows, and the buying/selling of creation units (ETFs).
  • date-targeted bond portfolio?
    Amrican Century offer Zero coupon bond funds that I believe liquidate at a specified date:
    BTTTX...2025
    BTTRX...2020
    BTFTX...2015
    "The investment seeks the highest return consistent with investment in U.S. Treasury securities. The fund invests at least 80% of assets in zero-coupon securities. It invests primarily in zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities and their equivalents, and may invest up to 20% of assets in AAA-rated zero-coupon U.S. government agency securities. Zero-coupon securities make no periodic interest or principal payments. The fund is managed to mature in the year 2015 and will be liquidated near the end of its target maturity year." Usually no defaut risk to impact
    Four Target date Corporate ETFs
    IBDA
    IBDB
    IBDC
    IBDD
    Article:
    indexuniverse.com/sections/news/19229-ishares-debuts-more-target-date-bond-etfs.html
    Guggenheim offers target date ETFs (many munis):
    Article:
    bonds.about.com/od/bondfunds/a/Target-Maturity-Bond-Etfs-An-Alternative-To-Laddering.htm
    A look at a target date ETF that mature this year:
    Case Study
  • questions for Messrs. Jackson and Park?
    Two questions:
    -Do they see the mutual fund as their only investment vehicle? (Do they see opening more funds)
    -Would they use this fund to invest in non-traditional assets, e.g. venture capital that the average investor(me) would not be otherwise able to get into given their background and expertise?
    As always thanks David.
  • 6% returns
    Hi Crash,
    Doing the math ... and, expected returns.
    On a well diversified portfolio a six percent return going forward is indeed a posibility by my thinking. Taking my own allocation and applying it on a $100,000.00 hypothetical amount which would equal $20,000 in cash at a zero return and then $25,000 to income at a return of 4% would be $1,000 in gains and then putting the rest $55,000 in stocks with an anticipated return of 8% results in gains for stocks in the amount of $4,400.00. Add the gains and I get an expected return of $5,400.00 or 5.4%. With this, expectations going forward based upon current elevated market valuations puts anticipated return expectation somewhat on the limited side. I am thinking the easy money has already been made over the next couple of years. No doubt stocks have had a good run ... but, things just don't go upward forever.
    I assure you Merrill Lynch will cost just as much to do business with them as some of the other major brokerage houses with neighborhood offices. And, Merrill Lynch is not without its problems either.
    Since you have heard from Merrill Lynch why not hear form the "bad guys" Edward Jones, Scottrade and Raymond James. All these have neighborhood offices. Then you have four choices of brokers that you can get in front of and do business face-to-face with the one of your choosing. Then there are some of the online brokers that you might explore also. Their cost will most likely be less. Scottrade, I beleive, has a mutual fund NTF platform. I have provided a link. They perhaps can provide the best of both worlds, in office broker advise when needed; and, internet access to online investing. Hey, why not take the tour?
    https://www.scottrade.com
    I think Catch 22 was on to something ... you might have been told about an insurance product with a six percent "guranteed" investment return feature. If so, my thinking, is you'll pay for a rider to get that. Many insurance products use mutual funds as investment vehicles.
    Knock on some doors, talk to some people ... and, then get back with us and let us know what you have discovered. Thus far you have told us little about your tolerance for risk, your goals, your capacity, time horozon, etc. All this should figure in. And, then you get to investment choices? You might look at David's list of Great Owl funds. They have been through some pretty close review by a former NASA engineer with a review process that I want go into. Thank you, Charles.
    Hope this helps ...
    Old_Skeet
  • yield on RiverPark Strategic Income (RSIVX)
    In essence, paying out over a larger base gives the later investors disproportionate amount of the dividends - it's like buying a dividend. The older shareholders are the winners - they get part their "income" in the form of appreciated shares, rather than all as interest dividends.
    To see this, consider a simple example (1% return in a month):
    Nov 1 - you own 100 shares @$10/share
    Nov 30 - the fund has accrued $10 in interest (share prices have correspondingly risen to $10.10)
    No 30 - the fund pays $10 in interest (ordinary income dividends); share price drops back to $10/share.
    Now consider what happens when someone buys in the middle of the month.
    Nov 1 - you own 100 shares @$10/share.
    Nov 15 - the fund's portfolio has accrued 1/2% of interest ($5). Share prices have correspondingly risen to $10.05.
    Nov 15 - someone else buys 100 shares @$10.05/share
    Nov 30th - share prices have risen another nickel (1/2% interest embedded in share price) to $10.10.
    Nov 30th - the fund's portfolio has accrued $15 of interest ($5 for the first half month, $10 for the second half). It pays out this interest, which is 7.5c/share. Share prices drop to $10.025.
    For shareholders who bought at the beginning of the month, they get 3/4% in interest dividends, and 1/4% in capital appreciation (higher share price). For shareholders who bought in the middle of the month (who should net 1/2% for holding just a half month), they also get 3/4% in interest, but lose 1/4% in share price.
    Note - this only works for funds that do not accrue dividends daily. Accruing daily means that each day, each share gets its share of interest for that day. That's the way MMFs work. If you buy a $1 share in the middle of the month, then at the end of the month, you get 1/2 month's interest. The fund's total interest is not divided equally over a growing base. Likewise, many bond funds accrue dividends daily. There are also many that do not, such as this one.
  • questions for Messrs. Jackson and Park?
    We chat Monday with Greg Jackson (ex-Oakmark Global) and John Park (ex-Acorn Select) about Oakseed Opportunity. The guys seem enthused and Greg listened-in on last month's call with Zac Wydra as a warm-up. I expect they'll talk about their decision to leave the world o' private venture capital funds for the relative calm and sanity of a global equity fund. If not, I'll likely ask them about it. Too, I'm likely to ask about their decision to lower their institutional minimum by 99%, what they make of the number of other mutual fund managers who've made large and visible investments in Oakseed (the fund's already at $80M AUM) and about the internal dynamic / division of responsibility.
    Their latest factsheet is posted at their (attractively revamped) website. If you're not able to make the call but would like to have me raise questions on your behalf, I'd be delighted to do so. Just let me know what you're thinking.
    And, too, it's easy to register for the call! (Monday, 11/18, 7:00 Eastern)
    As ever,
    David
  • My Funds Had A Great Day: Hope Your's Did Too
    Ted,
    I finally surpassed my previous portfolio record high set on 10/28.Also a good day for foreign and precious metal funds, which have been an anchor.Like you say,don't fight the fed! Kenny Polcari this AM:
    "Stocks are moving higher because the FED is feeding the beast, investors have nowhere else to go for yield, that they are forcing the risk trade and not because everything is coming up roses….and that about sums it up -the sign says: More Stimulus Ahead…"
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/14/markets-precious-idUSL4N0IZ2P420131114
    From Reuters BY WAYNE COLE
    SYDNEY Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:53pm EST
    The Nikkei .N225 jumped 1.3 percent early Friday to bring its gains for the week so far to a heady 6.9 percent, its best performance since December 2009. It also cracked major chart resistance around 15,000, which opened the way for a return to the May peak at 15,942.60.
  • FAIRX
    Reply to @clemg64:
    Fairholme proposes $52B recap for GSEs: WSJ
    Fairholme Capital Management offers to spearhead a move by a consortium of investors aimed at "purchasing, recapitalizing, and operating the mortgage-guarantee businesses" of Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) as state-regulated bond insurers, WSJ says.The offer was reportedly outlined by Bruce Berkowitz in a letter sent Wednesday evening to federal regulators.Earlier: Hedge funds pitch takeover of Frannie
  • RiverPark Strategic Income Fund Holdings as of 9/30/13 Posted (lip)
    Reply to @willmatt72: It was certainly open on October 1st when I made my initial investment at the NAV of $10.00. I believe it opened some time in September.
    Thanks, Andy. I'm looking forward to the 'whopping increase' in the dividend in the future. The capital appreciation (1.1%) during the last month and a half is not bad either.
  • RiverPark Strategic Income Fund Holdings as of 9/30/13 Posted (lip)
    "El Pollo Loco bank loan" for 1.9%. Guess that's me, since I just put my mutual fund winnowings into RSIVX. 8% sounds WAY too good to be true - nearing Madoff territory, but I'll settle for 4% and capital preservation for the next three years.
  • Risk Management with MF portfolio
    Decided to go with the CAPE or PE10 slopes and sold most of my recent mutual fund gains while keeping the base positions (probably should have sold more, but I can't make myself leave good funds). I didn't sell the L/S funds, but I may reconsider the long predominant funds.
    Plan to put most of it into RSIVX and try to control my impatience.
    My pending buys require a 10% correction.
    Haven't reduced my stocks, probably a mistake, but I'm not paying 1-1.5% a year for them, and most pay a dividend.
    Didn't sell in 2008-9, but was younger then. Won't sell if it happens within 3 years. Plan to be more balanced after that.
    Fund managers generally did no better than the indexes in 2008-9. Those with significant cash now are preparing for the next correction, so they might be worth buying.
    Depending on your age and risk acceptance, using index funds with 50-70% US stocks and the remainder of your stocks in international indexes, and 20% (high risk acceptance) in bonds (most writers suggest all US, but I like some international thru Vanguard), or 40% bonds (usual ratio)) has been good in the past. If near retirement, Social Security represents a bond equivalent, as per John Bogle, who has a lot more experience and is older than I, so you should shade your investments more toward stocks.
  • Risk Management with MF portfolio
    Using your classification my question was about "Capital Appreciation" and "Capital Preservation" accounts.
    My understanding these two accounts can be inside of one portfolio. If that portfolio has 60/40 asset allocation how would you divide it between "Capital Appreciation" and "Capital Preservation" accounts and what asset allocation each account should have?
  • Risk Management with MF portfolio
    Hi DavidV...thanks for posing the question. Like a swimming pool's diving board, the further one goes out on the risk spectrum the greater the likelihood for ups and downs on the reward spectrum. Not all your money need be position in high dive investments...but some should. Your fears are warranted, but maybe MFO can help.
    Linkster Ted often refers to his investments as being part of his "Capital Preservation" account or his "Capital Appreciation" account. I would add one more to his list of accounts and I'll call it a "Capital Spending" account. Thinking in these terms starts to sound like a plan is in place. Here's some thoughts on how I see this plan from my perspective.
    Capital you need today, tomorrow, and maybe over the next 1-3 years should reside in this "Capital Spending" account. For retirees this might include a pension, an annuity, a SS payment, or an investment distribution...basically a periodic stream of money that takes care of your periodic needs. If you are working, this is your paycheck and your emergency savings. Keep this money in FDIC insured accounts...keep it flexible...keep it accessible...keep it safe.
    Next, if there is extra savings beyond your short term needs (1-3 year time horizon) than I would set an investment goal that at least keeps up with inflation or a 2% return. This adds some risk, but it can be safely managed with strategies like laddering bonds or cds, as well as owning a few conservative allocation mutual funds. I would consider funds like VWINX, VWELX, BUFBX, and others. The investment time horizon for these funds is 3-5 year. Hopefuly a portion of your "fruit" from this "Capital Preservation" account can be picked periodically to replenish your "Capital Needs" account.
    Finally, if you are lucky enough to have additional monies to invest...think long term....5-10 years or longer...move further out on the diving board....try to buy when the board is low...think, emerging markets and precious mining funds right now (they are under performing). Rebalance when the board in high... jump some money off when you reach a personal goal...have some fun with these rewards...stimulate the economy.
    Over the long term this "Capital Appreciation" account will grow some of your money and provide needed resources to keep you other two accounts funded. Make action goals (rules to follow) for this account. One rule could be, "I will fully fund my other two accounts with a gain of 10% or more regardless of timeframe."
    Hope others chime in.