Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Top Large Cap Growth Funds 15 Years
    This may be a bit misleading because this list is only US focused large-cap growth funds and it doesn't include any sector specific funds. So I looked at large-cap growth funds through today without any restrictions and here's what I found. There were 467 distinct funds in existence for the last 15 years and 16 of them were better than Vanguard's Capital Opportunity fund which tops the linked list. Most of them were emerging markets or sector specific, but apparently Fidelity's Canada fund did marginally better as well. The last fund on the linked list was Fidelity Contrafund, which was ranked 13th on the linked list but came in at number 90 on my screen, or top 20%. Apparently 296 of the funds (or 63%) beat the S&P 500. I'd be a little suspicious of the claim that large cap growth funds on average only earned 4.45% over the last 15 years too. Essentially that's no return on an annual basis, but of the 467 funds on the screen I ran only 6 had negative annual returns for the last 15 years. Maybe the statement includes a bunch of funds that existed, lost money and then liquidated so they don't show up in my screen.
    I wouldn't debate whether core funds or value funds did better than growth funds, but the idea that the S&P, core and value funds all grew this much and growth did nothing seems odd.
  • new frontier for MLPs
    Hi John
    Yes the wife is about 5 years out from retiring from the US Postal Service. I also like their funds. We have G, C, I, 2020 income funds. Sold S end of last year. She works in Amish country....home of the Amish Mafia (lol!), and we are Lebanon Levi protected!
    Party on dude!
    the Pudd
  • Dividend Payers Attractive Again As Bond Yields Fall
    What is often not mentioned in articles like this is another important fact. When bond yields fall bond funds realize capital appreciation since the bonds they bought yesterday have a higher "value" (price+coupon) than the one's they could buy today.
    Capital appreciation of older issue bonds in a falling yield environment is a bond holders "alpha". If bonds are held to maturity they sell at face value...the bond holder collected their original investment plus the coupon...no harm no foul.
    Many have worried themselves out of bond positions. Bonds are less important for income these days and more important to help an overall portfolio cushion against equity markets periodically faltering. When this happens investors look for a "flight to safety", they buy bonds forcing yields to fall and as a result yesterday's bonds appreciate... the bond's value goes up.
    This bond appreciation provides a cushioning effect on their equity allocation and might even serve as the "dry powder" to reallocate back into equities when stocks reverse significantly.
    A stock dividend will only protect a stock's value equal to it's dividend. In a stock correction, a bond's value will often times appreciate.
    Dollar Cost Averaging into bonds when the stock market is moving higher by using proceeds from periodic stock profits is one way of buying bonds when they are out of favor.
    How did your bond do during this last "hiccup"? Over the past month as treasury yields have lowered; the etf, EDV (long duration treasuries), has appreciated in value over 4%, while VTI (total stock market) sold off by a little over 2%.
    image
    YTD, EDV is up 22% verses VTI gain of 4%. The 22% gain in EDV is the cushion for the overall portfolio or possible the "dry powder" that an investor could reallocate if they thought stocks were a "buy" right now.
    image
    It's my feeeling LT treasury funds like EDV have a portfolio cushioning effect on stock market risk. Because of their longer duration they possess an amplification effect verses shorter duration bonds. If you are trying to protect against interest rates rising for your cash position, buy shorter duration bonds. If you are trying to cushion periodic stock market downturns (equity risk) hold longer duration bonds.
    I see a place for both in a well diversified (risk adjusted) portfolio.
  • Old Skeet's Favorite Links, Portfolio Investment Sleeve Management System and More
    The below links will provide data and current information on how things are looking along with possibly a few featured articles from time-to-time. Last update 12/20/2015
    Markets At A Glance (WSJ) ... http://markets.wsj.com/usoverview
    (Click on the Market News tab for the morning, mid morning, mid day and closing report.)
    P/E Ratios & Yields On Major Indexes ... http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3021-peyield.html
    The Futures … http://finviz.com/futures.ashx
    (Don't forget to click the news tab.)
    Morningstar's Fair Value Graph ... http://www.morningstar.com/market-valuation/market-fair-value-graph.aspx
    (Don't forget to look at this by sector.)
    Morningstar's Category Returns ... http://news.morningstar.com/fund-category-returns/
    (Updated Daily)
    Morningstar's Instant Xray ... http://portfolio.morningstar.com/Rtport/Free/InstantXrayDEntry.aspx?entrynum=10
    Lipper Mutual Fund Indexes ... http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3020-lipperindx.html
    Lipper Mutual Fund Yardsticks ... http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3023-fundyrdstick.html
    Mutual Fund Observer ... http://www.mutualfundobserver.com
    Old Skeet's Favorite Links (2/19/2016) ... http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/14955/old-skeet-s-favorite-links-portfolio-investment-sleeve-management-system-and-more#latest
    Mutual Fund Research Monthly Newsletter ... http://funds-newsletter.com/
    Invest With An Edge ... Leadership Strategy & Weekly Newsletter ... http://investwithanedge.com/
    (Leadership Stretegy updates every Monday & the newsletter every Wednesday)
    Moose Signal ... http://decisionmoose.com/Moosignal.html
    (Updated Weekly on Monday)
    Investment Strategy (Jeffery Saut) ... http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm
    (Up dates every Monday around noon)
    Crossing Wall Street ... http://www.crossingwallstreet.com
    (Weekly Market Review every Friday)
    Advisor Perspectives ... http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/index.php
    Trader Mike's Daily Recap ... http://www.stocktradingtogo.com
    Sector Rotations ... http://blog.afraidtotrade.com
    FallondPicks ... http://www.markets.fallondpicks.com
    I wish all ... "Good Investing."
    Old Skeet
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    I have been asked for information, from time-to-time, on my Portfolio Investment Sleeve Management System. I am providing this infomation with my asset allocation ranges. It is detailed below.
    Old Skeet's Portfolio Investment Sleeve Managment System (2/19/2016)
    Here is a brief description of my sleeve system which I organized to help better manage the investments that were held in five accounts. The accounts consist of a taxable account, a self directed ira account, a 401k account, a profit sharing account and a health savings account plus two bank accounts. With this I came up with four investment areas. They are a cash area which consist of two sleeves … an investment cash sleeve and a demand cash sleeve. The next area is the income area which consists of two sleeves. … a fixed income sleeve and a hybrid income sleeve. Then there is the growth & income area which has more risk associated with it than the income area and it consist of four sleeves … a global equity sleeve, a global hybrid sleeve, a domestic equity sleeve and a domestic hybrid sleeve. An finally there is the growth area, where the most risk in the portfolio is found and it consist of five sleeves … a global sleeve, a large/mid cap sleeve, a small/mid cap sleeve and a specialty/theme sleeve plus a ballast/spiff sleeve. Each sleeve consists of three to six funds (in most cases) with the size and the weight of each sleeve can easily be adjusted, from time-to-time, by adjusting the number of funds and the amounts held. By using the sleeve system one can get a better picture of their overall investment picture and weightings by sleeve and area. In addition, I have found it beneficial to xray each fund, each sleeve, each investment area, and the portfolio as a whole quarterly (somtimes more often). Again, weightings can be adjusted form time-to-time as to how I might be reading the markets and wish to weight accordingly. All funds pay their distributions to the cash area of the portfolio with the exception being those in my 401k, profit sharing, and health savings accounts where reinvestment occurs. With the other accounts paying to the cash area builds the cash area of the portfolio to meet the portfolio’s monthly cash distribution needs with the residual being left for new investment opportunity. In addition, most all buy/sell trades settle from, or settle to, the cash area.
    Here is how I have my asset allocation is currently broken out by area and percent held ranges. Currently, my neutral/targets are cash 20%, income 30%, growth & income 35%, and growth 15%. I do an Instant Xray analysis of the portfolio quarterly (somtimes more often) and make asset weighting adjustments as I feel warranted based upon my assesment of the market, my risk tolerance, cash needs, etc.
    Cash Area (Weighting Range 15% to 25% with target at set 20%)
    Demand Cash Sleeve… (Cash Distribution Accrual & Future Investment Accrual)
    Investment Cash Sleeve … (Savings & Time Deposits)
    Income Area (Weighting Range 25% to 35% with target set at 30%)
    Fixed Income Sleeve: GIFAX, LALDX, LBNDX, NEFZX, THIFX & TSIAX
    Hybrid Income Sleeve: CAPAX, CTFAX, FKINX, ISFAX, JNBAX & PGBAX
    Growth & Income Area (Weighting Range 30% to 40% with target set at 35%)
    Global Equity Sleeve: CWGIX, DEQAX & EADIX
    Global Hybrid Sleeve: BAICX, CAIBX & TIBAX
    Domestic Equity Sleeve: ANCFX, FDSAX, INUTX, NBHAX, SPQAX & SVAAX
    Domestic Hybrid Sleeve: ABALX, AMECX, DDIAX, FRINX, HWIAX & LABFX
    Growth Area (Weighting Range 10% to 20% with target set at 15%)
    Global Sleeve: ANWPX, PGROX & THOAX
    Large/Mid Cap Sleeve: AGTHX, IACLX & SPECX
    Small/Mid Cap Sleeve: AJVAX, PCVAX & PMDAX
    Specialty/Theme Sleeve: LPEFX, PGUAX, TOLLX, NEWFX & THDAX
    Ballast/Spiff Sleeve: FISCX, VADAX & VNVAX
    Total number of mutual fund investment positions equal forty seven.
    I am providing a link to another investment sleeve management system of FMD Capital. This is definitely worth the read ... and, I have linked it below for your reading enjoyment. It is titled, "The Strategic Approach to Income Investing" and is written by Michael Fabian. http://fmdcapital.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/FMD_Income-Investing.pdf
    I wish all ... "Good Investing."
    Old_Skeet
  • More on the Portfolio Sleeve Management System
    I am providing more on the “Sleeve System” to investing. Seems others have found good value in a sleeve type management system besides myself.
    bee who has been a long time poster on the board and made me feel welcome when I first arrived (as some were rude) many years ago (back in the Fund Alarm days) recently sent me some information, she found, from FMD Capital about their using a sleeve type management system for income investing. My system is geared towards income plus capital appreciation as my system contains an additional growth area. In this way, capital gains (if needed) can be taken in addition to income generation to help supplement the portfolio's monthly distribution. Currently, I draw form three to five percent annualy form the portfolio and have been able to grow principal over time at these distribution rates.
    The FMD Capital system is definitely worth the read and it is linked below for your reading enjoyment. It is titled, "The Strategic Approach to Income Investing" and is written by Michael Fabian. http://fmdcapital.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/FMD_Income-Investing.pdf
    Thanks again bee ... It is most appreciated.
    I have also posted below how I have my sleeve system organized by area and by sleeve with current holdings.
    Sleeve System
    Here is a brief description of my sleeve system which I organized to help better manage the investments that were held in five accounts. The accounts consist of a taxable account, a self directed ira account, a 401k account, a profit sharing account and a health savings account plus two bank accounts. With this I came up with four areas. They are a cash area which consist of two sleeves … an investment cash sleeve and a demand cash sleeve. The next area is an income area which consists of two sleeves. … a fixed income sleeve and a hybrid income sleeve. Then there is the growth & income area which consist of four sleeves … a global equity sleeve, a global hybrid sleeve, a domestic equity sleeve and a domestic hybrid sleeve. An finally there is the growth area which consist of four sleeves … a global sleeve, a large/mid cap sleeve, a small/mid cap sleeve and a specialty sleeve. Each sleeve consists of three to six funds (in most cases) with the size and the weight of each sleeve can easily be adjusted, from time-to-time, by adjusting the number of funds and the amounts held. By using the sleeve system one can get a better picture of their overall investment picture and weightings by sleeve and area. In addition, I have found it beneficial to xray each fund, sleeve, an area and the portfolio as a whole. Again, weightings can be adjusted form time-to-time as to how I might be reading the markets and wish to weight accordingly. In addition, all fund distributions are taken in cash and are diverted to the cash area of the portfolio.
    Below is how I have it broken out with current holdings.
    Cash Area
    Demand Cash Sleeve… (Cash Awaiting Investment Deployment)
    Investment Cash Sleeve … (Savings & Time Deposits)
    Income Area
    Fixed Income Sleeve: ITAAX, LALDX, THIFX, LBNDX, NEFZX & TSIAX
    Hybrid Income Sleeve: AZNAX, CAPAX, FKINX, ISFAX, PASAX & PGBAX
    Growth & Income Area
    Global Equity Sleeve: CWGIX, DEQAX & EADIX
    Global Hybrid Sleeve: CAIBX, IGPAX & TIBAX
    Domestic Equity Sleeve: ANCFX, FDSAX, INUTX, NBHAX, SPQAX & SVAAX
    Domestic Hybrid Sleeve: ABALX, AMECX, CFIAX, DDIAX, FRINX, HWIAX & LABFX
    Growth Area
    Global Sleeve: ANWPX, PGROX, THOAX, DEMAX, NEWFX & THDAX
    Large/Mid Cap Sleeve: AGTHX, SPECX, IACLX, VADAX, HWAAX & BWLAX
    Small/Mid Cap Sleeve: IIVAX, PCVAX & PMDAX
    Specialty Sleeve: CCMAX, LPEFX & TOLLX
    I wish all ... "Good Investing."
    Old_Skeet
  • Gundlach's DoubleLine Funds See 6th Straight Month Of Inflows
    Oaktree (OAK) owns a pretty decent % of Doubleline.
    Oaktree loaned JG some administrative employees to help get DoubleLine off the ground, enabling DL to go from nothing to a fully functioning investment group in a matter of a few months, explained here on the Oaktree web site - guess it isn't quite clear from the text whether the startup assistance was part of the ownership deal, or if OT acquired its stake afterwards.
    "We opportunistically acquired a strategic equity stake in DoubleLine Capital LP, an independent asset manager to which we provided start-up assistance in 2009. This investment in DoubleLine represents Oaktree’s most significant equity investment in an external manager and was undertaken in recognition of our shared investment philosophy that emphasizes risk control, as well as the extraordinary performance record built by the professionals of DoubleLine while at Trust Company of the West."
  • Checking Up On Fidelity's New ETFs
    FYI: Copy & Paste 8/2/14: Lewis Braham: Barron's
    Regards,
    Ted
    If ETFs are like the Protestant Reformation to the fund industry, Fidelity is the Catholic Church. The House that Peter Lynch built is famous for its active management. That's why to fund insiders it was as astonishing as Vatican II when the $2 trillion money manager launched 10 sector index ETFs of its own last October. Prior to that it had opened only one other ETF, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index (ticker: ONEQ), which it let languish for more than a decade.
    No one can dispute the new ETFs have been a success. In less than a year, they've gathered $1.2 billion in assets. That's one of the most successful launches since Pimco opened an ETF version of Bill Gross's Pimco Total Return fund (BOND) in 2012, says Dave Nadig, chief investment officer of ETF.com. Yet the ETF evangelist argues that Fidelity did this out of desperation. "Fidelity is trying to stem the tide of outflows," Nadig says. "Over the last five years, there's been nearly $750 billion of inflows into ETFs and net outflows from mutual funds. To not do something like this is to cede the field to ETFs."
    The truth is more nuanced. Fidelity's foray into the ETF world wasn't capricious; its index-based sector ETFs are an outgrowth of the actively managed sector funds it's been running for more than 30 years. Moreover, despite the generally bleak outlook for mutual funds, Fidelity's 39 "Select" sector funds experienced $7.1 billion in inflows in the last five years, according to Morningstar, and the firm has seen overall inflows in that period -- there's no tide of outflows. And given the challenges of active management, it's impressive that 22 of those 39 funds have beaten more than 70% of their peers over the past decade.
    Anthony Rochte, who oversees Fidelity's sector-fund division, sees the new ETFs as more of a complement to the mutual funds, meant for a different kind of investor, rather than a substitute for the shop's existing products. "We realized that ETFs are critical to investors who might want to be more tactical," he says. "Mutual funds may not be the perfect fit for a financial advisor or individual investor who wants to trade intraday." Of the $600 billion invested in sector-based portfolios industrywide, more than 40% is invested in such aggressive ETF trading strategies, Rochte says.
    CERTAINLY, THE NEW ETFS have many features that will appeal to sector rotators -- especially those who are already Fidelity customers. If you buy shares at Fidelity, there are no transaction fees, although like other brokers who offer such free trades, Fidelity will impose a $7.95 short-term penalty if you hold your shares less than 30 days. Longer-term investors will also appreciate the ETFs' 0.12% expense ratios, the lowest for their sectors. The ETFs also represent their sectors better than competitors by holding more small companies. Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC), for instance, has 311 holdings, including many small, rapidly growing biotech companies, compared with the 55, mostly blue-chip stocks in the better-known Health Care Select Sector SPDR (XLV).
    That said, volumes in the 10 ETFs have only ranged between 36,000 and 93,000 shares a day over the past three months -- good enough for individual investors but not large institutions. "Those volumes are nowhere near enough for a hedge fund to make major allocations," says Nadig. "But that will come with time." He thinks the ETFs will be successful because Fidelity has a "captive audience" at its brokerage. The firm has more than 15 million retail brokerage accounts and 10,000 financial advisors trading on its platform.
    FOR LARGE INVESTORS there is also a workaround to buying shares in bulk. David Haviland, who runs $1.1 billion in ETF strategies at Beaumont Capital Management, bought $162 million of Fidelity ETFs in one day earlier this year when trading volumes were much lower than now. Instead of buying the ETF shares via the exchange, his traders contacted market-maker Knight Capital Group, which creates baskets of stocks underlying the ETFs. If you're willing to buy enough shares -- 40,000 in Fidelity's case -- KCG or another market-maker, like Goldman Sachs, will essentially purchase the underlying stocks and create a new batch of ETFs. Dealing directly with a market-maker like this ensures big purchases won't affect the share price on the open market.
    Because Haviland employs an aggressive, momentum-based strategy, Fidelity's actively managed mutual funds never held any interest for him. He needs to exit on a dime when an ETF loses momentum to protect clients' capital. So in his case there really is no question of Fidelity ETFs appealing to a different kind of customer, one that is cannibalizing Fidelity's core business.
    Other experts believe that whether you substitute Select funds for ETFs depends on which sector you're invested in. Jim Lowell, editor of the Fidelity Sector Investor newsletter, thinks investors might be better off in Fidelity's energy ETF than its active funds because the sector is so volatile and driven by rapidly shifting commodity prices. "You want to be nimble and quick with an energy ETF because you'll more likely be trading out of your position quickly," he says. "The benefits of an active manager aren't there in that space from my perspective."
    Still, Lowell favors Fidelity's Select funds overall. "It will be very difficult for any sector ETF that's using a passive index to outperform Fidelity's active managed sector funds over any meaningful investment timeline," he says. While the academic research suggests indexing wins in general, choosing between active funds and passive ETFs at Fidelity remains a matter of belief.
  • Can You Afford To Retire Early ? Are You Saving Enough ?
    FYI: The Five-Year Rally in Stocks Has Bolstered Workers' Nest Eggs. But Consider These Six Issues First.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://online.wsj.com/articles/can-you-afford-to-retire-early-1406912729#printMode
    Are You Saving Enough For Retirement ? Copy & Paste 7/31/14: Walter Updegrave: WSJ
    Fueled by surging stock prices, average 401(k) balances have come back from the beating they took in the financial crisis and now stand at or near record highs.
    But hold the confetti.
    The tailwind of stocks' nearly 18% of annualized gains of the past five years—almost double the stock market's long-term average—clearly isn't sustainable for the long term. Indeed, given today's low interest rates and high stock prices relative to earnings, average annual stock returns over the next decade or so could come in at well below half the pace of recent years.
    Which means if you want to accumulate enough savings during your career to sustain you in retirement, you will have to do it the old-fashioned way: by saving diligently.
    On that front, the news isn't quite so upbeat. A survey of 144 large 401(k) plans covering some 3.5 million employees released in July by benefits consulting firm Aon Hewitt found that the annual contribution for employees and employer matching funds combined averaged just under 11% of salary last year, down a tad from the year before.
    And although the survey also showed that the average employee-plus-employer contribution rises with age—starting at 7.6% of salary for participants in their 20s and climbing to 10.1%, 11%, 12.7% and 13.4% for participants in their 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s, respectively—not a single age group averaged the 15% a year that retirement experts generally recommend if you want to maintain your preretirement lifestyle after calling it a career.
    Fortunately, it doesn't take a heroic savings effort to appreciably boost the eventual size of your nest egg and enhance your retirement prospects.
    Let's assume you are 25 years old, earn $50,000 a year and receive 2% annual raises, and that you make an "average" effort to fund a retirement account such as your 401(k). That is, throughout your career the total of your contributions plus employer matching funds mirrors the age-group averages in the Aon Hewitt survey.
    If you invest your savings in a diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds that earns a reasonable rate of return—say, 6% a year after fees—your 401(k) balance would total roughly $1.1 million at age 65.
    That is a tidy sum, to be sure. But it probably isn't enough to replace enough of your income over at least 30 years of retirement.
    Generally, advisers say personal savings should generate 50% to 60% of your preretirement income, so that withdrawals from savings plus another 20% to 25% from Social Security and other sources (part-time work, a pension) replace at least 75% to 80% your preretirement income—a level experts generally consider the benchmark for maintaining your preretirement standard of living after you retire.
    Increasing the amount you save by even a relatively small amount can significantly improve your chances of reaching that level.
    For example, if instead of saving at that average level, reported by Aon Hewitt, you set aside just an extra 1% of salary each year, your 401(k) account's value would climb to just under $1.2 million at age 65. Assuming a 4% initial withdrawal of $48,000, your savings would now be able to replace nearly 45% of pre-retirement income from savings alone. Boost your savings rate another 1% each year, and your account's projected value rises to almost $1.3 million, which allows for a withdrawal of $52,000, bringing you just within reach of replacing 50% of your preretirement income from savings.
    And if you manage to stash away the 15% a year that advisers recommend, you would have a nest egg at age 65 valued at almost $1.6 million, providing for an initial withdrawal of $64,000, or about 60% of preretirement income. Throw in an additional 20% to 25% from Social Security and other sources, and your retirement income now meets or exceeds that 75% to 80% benchmark.
    Aside from the obvious benefit of a larger nest egg generating more income in retirement, saving at a higher rate during your career also makes your retirement strategy less vulnerable to setbacks from financial shocks.
    For example, the hypothetical 25-year-old in the scenarios above saved like a machine each and every year over four decades. In the real world, job losses, health problems, unexpected expenses and all manner of other unanticipated events can prevent even the most diligent saver from sticking to a savings regimen uninterrupted over an entire career. By making the effort to save at a higher rate when things are going well, however, you effectively will build a cushion that will help you better absorb any financial setbacks and get your retirement planning back on track.
    Such a cushion can come in especially handy late in your career. For example, if you are on the verge of retiring and the stock market takes a dive, having $1.6 million in savings instead of $1.1 million could mean the difference between scaling back your lifestyle a bit but still going ahead with your retirement plans versus having to postpone your employment exit and spend extra years on the job.
    The single best way to maximize your savings effort is to sign up for your company's 401(k) or similar plan. Aside from the benefit that your contributions and investment earnings in a 401(k) account go untaxed until withdrawal, the fact that money is automatically deducted from your paycheck makes it more convenient to save, and more likely you actually will do so.
    That said, some features in 401(k) plans that were designed to spur savings can sometimes have the opposite effect. For example, the lure of "free money" in the form of company matching contributions clearly creates an incentive to save. But the Aon Hewitt survey shows that nearly a third of 401(k) participants contribute just enough to get the full company match.
    While doing that may seem smart, in that you get the largest company match while you shell out as little as possible, it also can leave you short of the savings rate required to assure a secure retirement.
    Keep in mind, though, that while 15% is generally a reasonable goal, the actual amount you should be setting aside can vary considerably depending on your salary, how much you already have stashed away and the number of years until you retire.
    There are many online retirement planning tools that can help you home in on the right annual savings target for you. Whether you use a basic calculator or a more comprehensive one that allows you to vary such assumptions as how you invest your savings and your planned retirement date, you will want to reassess every year or so to see whether your current savings rate is adequate.
    As exciting as it may be to watch the value of your nest egg swell as stock prices soar, over the long run it is how much you save that will determine how well you can live in retirement.
  • What is the best loaded funds - regardless of asset class?
    Yes, I have a good number of them on my watch list. However, for me to buy something new I'd be a seller of something somewhere eventhough I recently sold three funds MFLDX, JCRAX & KSDVX ... I am currently in a build cash mode. Also, a good number of the current funds I own are held in a taxable account ... and, I'd have capital gains to pay to make a good size reconfiguration. I own a good number of funds now ... and, there are those that say I have way too many as it is. Perhaps so ... Perhaps not! I plan to hold no more than fifty two so I could buy three new funds as I currently own forty nine. Perhaps a good pull back will be coming, as some say, and I'll do a little buying.
    Old_Skeet
  • 4 Foreign-Stocks Funds That Aren't Scared Of Emerging Markets
    "....Spitzer and later the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also charged that major mutual fund groups such as Janus, Bank One's One Group, and Strong Capital Management and others facilitated "market timing" trading for favored clients.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_mutual_fund_scandal
  • This Stock Bubble Is 'Beyond 1929 And 2007', Says John Hussman
    FYI Hussman’s funds have missed out on much of the strong equity gains in recent years, prompting some criticism of his investing style. The Hussman Strategic Growth Fund HSGFX is down 1.5% this year, compared to 7.2% gains on the S&P 500 index SPX , according to Morningstar. The other funds have fared a bit better: The Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund HSTRX is up 6.8%. The Hussman Strategic Growth Fund HSIEX is up 1.9%, while the Hussman Strategic Dividend Value HSDVX is up 0.2%.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/07/27/this-stock-bubble-is-beyond-1929-and-2007-says-john-hussman/tab/print/
  • Collectibles Lag Equities
    Hi Doc, Mo,
    Hope you and yours are both doing well.
    These figures don't surprise me at all. Equities are always where the good gains lie. Collectibles, as they were, are more of a wealth preservation hedge.
    I still go back to the elder Baron Rothschild saying that to be safe, one should have 1/3 of their wealth in securities, 1/3 in real estate and 1/3 in 'rare art'. We'll call rare art = collectibles. I'm good with this. Gees, i's been 7-8 years since I first read this and I'm still not at 33/33/33. That's OK. I'm close enough that it really doesn't matter much on the margin.
    No one has shown me a better plan.
    peace,
    rono
  • Former Janus Star Blaine Rollins Attempts A Mutual-Fund Comeback
    FYI: Blaine Rollins helped catapult Janus Capital Group to fame in the 1990s, earning a promotion in 2000 to captain of the Janus Fund, the family's $50 billion flagship.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.denverpost.com/Business/ci_26176640/Former-Janus-star-Blaine-Rollins-attempts-a-mutualfund-comeback
  • Jason Zweig: In Honor Of Peter Bernstein
    FYI: Copy & Paste 7/23/14: Jason Zweig: WSJ;
    Regards,
    Ted
    include a tribute to the late Peter L. Bernstein. Few things have given me greater professional and personal pleasure than having been able to call Peter my friend.
    Peter, who died five years ago at the age of 90, spent nearly six decades on Wall Street. He also worked at the Federal Reserve, taught economics at Williams College, toiled as a commercial banker, ran an investment-counseling firm, and consulted on economics and investing strategy with some of the world’s largest money managers. He was the founding editor of the Journal of Portfolio Management, which took as its mission to make investing as close to a science as the theory and the data would permit. He wrote nearly 20 books, including the twin masterpieces Capital Ideas, his history of how modern financial theory transformed investing, and Against the Gods, probably the best popular book ever written on risk.
    Like most people who knew him, I regarded Peter as the philosopher-king of Wall Street, the man who had read everything, knew everyone, and had thought longer and deeper about the hardest puzzles than anyone else.
    Yet the central lesson that emerged from Peter’s life and work was intellectual humility, not hubris. The more he learned, the more skeptical he became of his—or anyone’s—ability to predict the future.
    Insatiably curious, Peter never stopped learning, and his favorite word when confronted with something he hadn’t yet thought of was “Wow!”
    I think of him as the modern equivalent of the sages described by the great French essayist Montaigne:
    “To really learned men has happened what happens to ears of wheat: They rise high and lofty, heads erect and proud, as long as they are empty; but when they are full and swollen with grain in their ripeness, they begin to grow humble and lower their horns.”
    Again and again, Peter would marvel that he could “make a living by reminding people of what they know only too well already.”
    In 1999, I was thrilled when Peter asked me to write a guest essay for his newsletter. (To avoid any conflict of interest, he didn’t offer, nor did I request, any compensation for writing it.) For my topic, I chose the challenge that professional money managers faced in trying to take a long-term perspective in an increasingly short-term world.
    We titled it “The Velocity of Learning and the Future of Active Management.” Fifteen years later, the topic seems at least as relevant (click here to download the PDF).
    In 2004, I drove up to Peter’s summer house in Brattleboro, Vt., to do a long interview. We talked for nearly four hours about everything from John F. Kennedy (Peter’s classmate in the Harvard College class of 1940) and Peter’s experiences as an intelligence officer during the London blitz in World War II to the problems of 401(k)s and the puzzle of why companies pay dividends.
    Together, he and his wife, Barbara, could be as wickedly funny as classic comedy teams like Burns and Allen or Stiller and Meara. Peter mentioned during that interview that he and his lifelong friend, the economist Robert Heilbroner, had done everything together as children and teenagers. “We even lost our virginity together, at the exact same moment,” he recalled. “Not at the exact same moment, Peter,” Barbara said.
    You can click here for part one of my profile of him and here for part two; the PDFs are large files that could take a while to load, but any visit with Peter is worth the wait. A fuller transcript of our long conversation is available here.
    Economics And Portfolio Strategy: http://green.lunarbreeze.com/~jason146/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/PLBjz.pdf
    Peter's Uncertainty Principle Part 1. http://green.lunarbreeze.com/~jason146/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/11.04PBernstein1.pdf
    Peter's Uncertainty Principle Part 2. : http://green.lunarbreeze.com/~jason146/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/11.04PBernstein2.pdf
  • How Good Are M*'s Fund Picks ?
    "Over the past 10 years through May 30, Morningstar’s gold-rated diversified U.S. stock funds (previously called analyst picks) on average returned 8.1% annualized, an average of 0.3 percentage point per year ahead of Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index."
    When you consider that the Index fund probably has had little to no capital gains distributions, meaning it is very tax friendly and has excellent after tax performance.........was that extra .3% even worth it?
    It calls into question the whole issue of trying to pick funds that beat an index.
    It worked quite well in the developed foreign markets arena, but sure not in the diversified U.S. stock funds arena
  • High Yield Spreads Widen: Should You Be Worried ?
    http://blogs.barrons.com/incomeinvesting/2014/07/23/lack-of-liquidity-hampering-high-yield-rebound/?mod=BOL_hp_blog_ii
    More on the most hated asset class. I hate em too but when everyone hates something that is less than 1% off all time highs it has to make you wonder if new highs are dead ahead. Meanwhile junk munis have more than righted themselves and some (EIHYX) are looking at their 7th consecutive month of gains (including dividends) YTD. I am back to 100% junk munis and in hindsight wish I had played EIHYX instead of NHMRX this year. That's because EIHYX, albeit a tad less YTD than NHMRX, has been much steadier especially during the early July selloff (where I stupidly sold and then had to reload again) I do have around 20% there and may switch more from NHMRX whose outperformance YTD can be traced to its sole stock holding - AAL.
  • A Farmland Investment Primer
    I think the issue really becomes in terms of the average investor, one: the concern over overvaluation. Two, the idea that when you invest in something like Gladstone Land (LAND), the idea being that you are investing in the land itself and not participating in potential commodity production gains.
    What remains interesting to me is ag/commodity infrastructure - how are commodities stored, how are they shipped? I like the few available plays on grain infrastructure - Andersons (ANDE), ADM (ADM) and Graincorp (GRCLF.PK) being the most prominent and ADM being the most consistent (additionally, ADM owns about 20% of Graincorp, despite being denied when they tried to take it over.)
    You also have the rails, which continue to do very well. In terms of farmers and rail, look at Canada, whose rails are so busy that the country had to threaten to fine the rails in order to move grain backlog. Until it gets moved, it's sitting at a facility somewhere. Ag Growth International (AGGZF) is a company that makes handling and storage equipment/facilities.
    CHS (which is a gigantic co-op) pfd shares (there are three different versions, no common shares) provided a pfd stock option for ag income.
    I don't think there's a really great "pure play" investment on farmland for the average investor, but there some options here-and-there, as well as alternatives in the ag universe.
  • A Farmland Investment Primer
    From Julie Koeninger of GMO (the investment firm):
    "Farmland investments consist of direct investments in rural land along with crop and livestock assets that produce food, fiber, and energy. Farmland investments focus on the productive capacity of the land base, and returns are based on the biological growth of crops and livestock, as well as appreciation of land and related assets. By their nature, farmland investments are long-term illiquid investments in real assets."
    image
    and,
    "Investment Vehicles
    Investors can participate in the farmland asset class through direct investments or through the use of a specialist farmland investment manager, that may offer funds, co-investments, or separately managed accounts. For most investors, developing a well-diversified portfolio of direct investments is prohibitively complex and time-consuming. Investing in farmland through a farmland investment manager can provide the benefits of diversification, experience, and scale. Closed-end funds have a fixed term with some potential for extension, but are generally illiquid for the term. As with private equity, fund terms can vary widely. Open-ended funds and publicly-traded REITs provide more liquidity, but valuation at entry and exit can be an issue in open-ended funds, and the performance of public REITs can be influenced by capital market trends and other factors apart from the underlying farmland investment. Co- investments and managed accounts often require a larger minimum investment, but offer investors a greater measure of control.
    "
    Full Primer:
    advisorperspectives.com/commentaries/gmo_072114.php?WT.rss_f=CommentaRSS&WT.rss_ev=a&WT.rss_a=A_Farmland_Investment_Primer
    Related Article from Barron's:
    blogs.barrons.com/penta/2012/06/15/investing-in-timber-and-farmland/tab/print/
  • Is There Too Much Junk In Your Trunk ?
    A lot of dire forecasts for junk bonds in the various links of Ted original link above. Here's some more negative comments, these coming from Michael Aneiro's column in this week's Barron's. Mr. Aneiro has been a regular Cassandra on junk bonds for well over a year now. You know the broken clock analogy, so maybe Mr. Aneiro's time has finally arrived.
    >>>Among current pockets of risk, as I've warned in this column before, is the corporate bond market. Not only are corporates rich, but they can also be harder to sell than they were just a few years ago. Since the financial crisis, banks have cut their corporate-bond holdings to keep pace with regulations. Inventory is down by 40% to 75%, according to various estimates, and if there's ever a rush to sell, fewer willing buyers could mean steeper losses, affecting bonds, mutual funds, and ETFs alike.
    "THERE'S NO QUESTION that liquidity has decreased," says Gershon Distenfeld, director of high yield at AlianceBernstein, who says increased capital requirements have curtailed risk appetite among banks and dealers and made it more costly to maintain bond inventories. He adds that Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and Merrill Lynch used to represent more than a third of U.S. high-yield trading volume, and none of them exist as a stand-alone entity today.
    Fixed-income trading at banks "is evaporating," says James Swanson, chief investment strategist at MFS Investment Management. He sees corporate bonds, particularly high yield, as increasingly perilous for investors. "Are those markets, given how low yields are, compensating you for the risk of illiquidity?"
    Corporate bonds are often pulled in two directions: When equity prices fell amid last week's turmoil, riskier corporates slid, too, but the losses were tempered by gains in underlying Treasury bonds. That pattern can hold up for short periods but will be challenged during more protracted downturns, especially if nobody really wants to buy.<<<
  • What's Your Thoughts on MFLDX?
    As of Sunday AM 7:45 EDT, as I write, here is how I have scored the comments.
    Undecided 1 (me) ... Hold (2) Old_Joe & Scott ... Sell (2) Chinfist & Decrow ... No Opinion (1) Junkster. Although, I scored Junkster's comment as no opinion I believe he is of the camp to do what one thinks is best within their own portfolio regardless of what others might be thinking. I respect that. However, I wanted to know what others were thinking that own, or recently owned, the fund. Even without knowing what others were thinking I am inclined to let it go since Mainstay bought it, it seems that it has become too large for its manager to effective manage it in a more rapid ever changing macro environment. It may turn out to be a good fund and I sincerely hope so for those that continue to hold it. I plan to move own and will redeploy my capital somewhere else, possibly FCHSX. I purchased the fund for what I felt was its ability to navigate an ever changing macro environment; however, over the past year it seems to be faltering in its mission.
    For me, MFLDX is one of five funds held in the growth area specialty sleeve of my portfolio. So with this, it is not an extremely large position within the portfolio itself but it does make up about 25% of its sleeve. I will be leaving with some good jingle (profit) in my pocket.
    Thanks for all that made comments. It is much appreciated.
    Old_Skeet
    Current Revised Poll Count 7/21 7:35 Am EDT... Undecided (1) Hank ... Hold (3) Old_Joe, Scott & BobC... Sell (5) Chinfist, Decrow, Old_Skeet, Vintage Freak & Ted ... No Opinion (2) Junkster & Timgr