Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Tariffs
    The following comments regarding Trump's tariffs were excerpted from an AP article published on Oct. 27, 2020.
    Although the situation is different this time, historical information is useful in providing some context.
    Please limit comments to how tariffs may impact the economy or investing.
    This thread is not intended for political diatribes - please use Off Topic for that.
    "Trump set his sights on shrinking America’s vast trade deficits, portraying them as evidence
    of economic weakness, misbegotten deals and abusive practices committed by other countries.
    He pledged to boost exports and to curb imports by imposing tariffs — import taxes — on many foreign goods."

    "America’s deficit in goods and services now exceeds what it was under President Barack Obama.
    Steel and aluminum makers have cut jobs despite Trump’s protectionist policies on their behalf.
    His deals made scarcely a ripple in a $20 trillion economy.
    For most Americans, Trump’s drastic trade policy ultimately meant little, good or bad, for their financial health."

    "Yet the belligerent approach has made scant difference in the number he cares about most:
    The overall trade deficit in goods and services.
    It barely dipped last year — by 0.5% to $577 billion, still higher than in any year of the Obama administration.
    This year, the gap has widened nearly 6%, with the coronavirus pandemic having crushed tourism, education
    and other service 'exports.'”

    "Contrary to his assertions, too, Trump’s tariffs have been paid by American importers, not foreign countries.
    And their cost is typically passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.
    Researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Princeton and Columbia universities
    have estimated that the president’s tariffs cost $831 per U.S. household annually."

    “His administration’s approach has delivered few tangible benefits to the U.S. economy while undercutting
    the multilateral trading system, disrupting long-standing alliances with U.S. trading partners
    and fomenting uncertainty, said Eswar Prasad, a Cornell University economist who formerly
    led the International Monetary Fund’s China division."

    https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-virus-outbreak-global-trade-trade-policy-mexico-39aadae9a6d18de2b91889f1e552b605
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    IMHO the biggest problem is the uncertainty. What are the tariffs today? Wednesday? Next Tuesday? And because businesses cannot make long term capital allocation plans, this virtually guarantees that GDP will be below potential GDP. That's an argument against investing in stocks generally.
    But some companies can benefit. The tariffs (whether actually imposed or not) have united Canadians in their opposition to buying US products (regardless of whether their governments officially boycott or tariff US goods). This bodes well for Canadian companies that sell domestically (i.e. to Canadians).
    https://ca.style.yahoo.com/trumps-unjustified-25-tariffs-have-begun-heres-how-to-buy-canadian-during-a-trade-war-list-of-canadian-brands-to-shop-144356266.html
    And as an added bonus - once Canada is incorporated into the US, the large US market will again be open to all those Canadian companies without foreign tariffs. Just a thought for those with a longer investment horizon :-)
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    Per "Morning Brief" link posted by @Mark:
    "Ambiguity is the No. 1 enemy of a market," former director of the National Economic Council and current IBM (IBM) vice chair Gary Cohn said on Opening Bid. "When a company creates ambiguity in their earnings profile, in their growth profile, in their business model, the market will punish that stock. When politicians, legislators create ambiguity in the way that taxes are going to work, the way that capital gains are going to work, the way that they're going impose tariffs, they create ambiguity to a market and the market as a whole reprices."
    But, hey, keep dip-buying.
  • How Tariffs Could Shock America’s Power System
    Some of you may recall my unease over the years at the fact that we no longer manufacture many types of electrical transformers that are absolutely critical to any large grid system. Many of those transformers are special-order items currently made only in China, and that have lengthy time-frames to design and manufacture.
    Following are excerpts from a recent Wall Street Journal report, which goes into some detail on this issue:
    Transformers used in power grids are especially vulnerable to trade disruptions
    America’s power grid is due for some big investments. Tariffs could now make that much costlier.
    As surging power demand from places such as data centers is set to strain the system, transformers, the nuts and bolts of the power system, look particularly vulnerable. These are devices that step up or down voltages as electricity moves from power plants to homes and factories. New ones are also required every time a new source of electricity—whether wind, solar or natural gas—connects to the grid. The lack of these components can therefore hold up more power from being brought online.
    The power industry has already been experiencing a shortage of transformers, for which demand is expected to jump even more in the coming years. Suppliers have been reluctant to invest large sums of capital to expand production capacity because such investments have long break-even timelines. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates that about 55% of in-service distribution transformer units are older than 33 years and approaching their end of life.
    So far, the Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as a 10% across-the-board tariff on China. But more could come: The one-month pause on Trump’s proposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico is set to expire in early March. Meanwhile, Trump has ordered federal agencies to explore reciprocal tariffs on trading partners around the world. He has also floated tariffs on copper.
    Transformers could become a chokepoint. Only about 20% of transformer demand can be met by the domestic supply chain, according to Wood Mackenzie, which also estimated that transformer prices have already risen 70% to 100% since January 2020 because of inflation for raw materials such as electrical steel and copper.
    Mexico, Canada and China are important sources of electrical equipment to the U.S. In 2024, China accounted for over 32% of U.S. low-voltage transformer equipment imports and Mexico accounted for 36% of high-voltage transformer imports. Canada accounted for about 16% of U.S. imports of high-voltage switchgear and 100% of imported utility poles. Utilities typically go through a lengthy process to test the reliability of transformers they are purchasing and tend to require custom specifications, so it isn’t an easy process to switch to a new supplier.
    Tariffs will pile new cost pressures on an already-tight grid. The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities said its residential customers’ average monthly bill is expected to increase by 17% to 20% for the 12-month period starting June 2025, partly due to data center-driven demand growth. Nationwide, electricity prices have increased at a compound annual growth rate of 5.7% over the last five years, a considerable acceleration since the preceding five years when prices were roughly flat, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    Also worth watching: If the 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum do result in a reshoring of those energy-intensive industries, that itself would add to long-term power demand.

    Comment: How likely is it that the current administration has the slightest idea of what transformers are or how crucial they are to the United States economy and manufacturing capability?
  • Morningstar Prospects List
    @Observant1: Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the forum.
    Morningstar Prospects—a list of up-and-coming or under-the-radar investment strategies that Morningstar Manager Research monitors to potentially bring under full
    coverage
    Which accounts for the inclusion of Fidelity Fund FFIDX, started in 1930.
    Some others (semi-random selection):
    VEGBX Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond
    BFRIX BlackRock Floating Rate Income
    PRCFX TRP Capital Appreciation and Income
    ARHBX Artisan International Explorer
    JEEIX JHancock Infrastructure
    Apparently this is a regularly published list (annually?).
  • T Rowe Price ETFs in registration
    "T. Rowe Price (NASDAQ-GS: TROW), a global investment management firm, announced today the addition of two new active transparent equity exchange-traded funds (ETF): T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (Ticker: TCAL) and T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (Ticker: THEQ)."

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/t-rowe-price-expands-active-equity-etf-roster-with-two-new-transparent-offerings-302413283.html
  • Tesla’s Europe sales drop nearly 45% amid row over Musk’s Trump links
    Thanks @gman57. I owe you one! All of us occassionally mix political and financial content together - self included. It’s a challenge not to. Let’s try the best we can to keep those separate to the degree possible.
    Why?
    - Both sides of the political spectrum invest and know a lot about investing. It is not in our best interest to discourage input from either side. The more contributions and perspectives on investing, the better for all of us.
    - MFO is funded by donations. Why discourage members of “the other side” from contributing? We all lose in that case,
    - The Off Topic board has long been utilized for moaning, groaning and political venting. And I can’t ever recall any MFO participant complaining about that. I for one feel fortunate that Off-Topic exists as a place to share things like books, films, travel, songs and - yes, the often unseemly going-ons in our nation’s capital.
    Thanks again.
    @gmam57 Re: Shorting TSLA - Yes that would be an appropriate investing topic. In fact, @rono has started such a thread.
    Shorting is fraught with risk. Losses can be infinite if the stock keeps rising. Even if you know you are right, at some point the costs of “covering” your shorts could drive you out of the market. I like to play the long-short game through funds. Even the experts find it a challenge (lackluster returns). But you won’t lose your house playing with them. In the L/S realm I own CPLSX and CPZ. Together they comprise near 20% of my portfolio. Both of those funds run by Calamos have indeed been shorting TSLA. Another one I used to own is NLSAX. Also a decent fund. Why Shorting Stocks is Risky
    @gman57 - Here is the portion of your previous post (later deleted by you) which I objected to: ”Yes, I'm going to a takedown Tesla event 3/29. Sooner or later we each are going to have to stand up. I'm going to do it before it gets so bad it's no longer effective. Are you going to wait until we attack Greenland?”
  • EXTREMELY late TRP tax documents just arrived, 21st March.
    It looks like one can trade etf MMFs at T Rowe Price, even though you can't do this at Fidelity or Schwab.
    https://mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/63581/fidelity-schwab-block-orders-of-blackrock-and-texas-capital-etfs
    I agree that Fidelity is top-notch. Though nobody is perfect.
  • Fidelity, Schwab Block Orders of BlackRock and Texas Capital ETFs
    Fido is not as benign as it seems. They are forcing all Advisor Clients to stop using their MMF for sweep vehicles and use FCASH instead. FCASH pays at least 1% less than their MMFs.
    I have not checked to see if it is FDIC insured but I don't think so
    "Taxable Interest Bearing Cash Option (FCASH), a free credit balance and is payable to you on demand by Fidelity. Fidelity may use this free credit balance in connection with its business, subject to applicable law. Fidelity may pay you interest on this free credit balance, and this interest will be based on a schedule set by Fidelity, which may change from time to time. As of December 23, 2024, the interest rate for this option is 2.19%."
    The advisor we are talking to says they are forced to trade into Government MMF nightly just to get a better rate.
    It is interesting that Fido thinks it can stiff Advisors who have Billions under management like this.
    There are a number of short term Treasury Bill ETFs like BIL very similar to Texas Capital product. I wonder if they will go after them too?
    This seems designed to po BlackRock
  • Fidelity, Schwab Block Orders of BlackRock and Texas Capital ETFs

    Per BBG:
    Fidelity Investments and Charles Schwab Corp. are prohibiting clients from investing in money-market ETFs on their trading platforms, an unusual move for the financial powerhouses who typically permit easy access to funds that already trade on an exchange.
    The two firms are blocking purchases of three exchange-traded funds offered by BlackRock Inc. and Texas Capital, the first to track money—market securities such as Treasury bills and other government-backed debt in an ETF structure.
    The new funds serve as a direct challenge to mutual-fund providers, who have long been big, established players in money-market products. Fidelity and Schwab alone manage trillions of dollars in money-market assets, and this month, Schwab filed plans to launch its own government money-market ETF.
    A Schwab spokesperson said its decision is consistent with the firm’s “long-standing approach” of only making available Schwab affiliate money-market mutual funds, while a Fidelity spokesperson said this is an extension of the company’s policy to “generally restrict” third-party money-market mutual funds.
    Yet, the move stands out because trading platforms like Schwab and Fidelity typically don’t restrict exchange-traded funds, even if those funds are in competition with existing in-house offerings.

    In Schwab's case, they need to drive folks into their MMFs because even there they profit from customers' stored cash with those more expensive MMFs. Fido's rationale, I can't tell -- I thought they had more customer-friendly cash management policies/offerings.
    I'll stick with SGOV or equivalents at Schwab.
  • EXTREMELY late TRP tax documents just arrived, 21st March.
    I was recently notified by USPS Informed Delivery that a letter from TRP will be delivered. ... I did not receive the said letter... Two days later my neighbor brought over the TRP letter.
    ...
    I would trust USPS over TRP for service reliability.
    Let me see if I've got this right. USPS failed to deliver a letter to you. If not for the good graces of a neighbor, you never would have known what happened to the letter, let alone recovered it. And you are willing to place any measure of trust in the USPS?
    I've watched the USPS lose certified letters that I've sent; leave bags of mail destined for various addresses in the middle of our lobby for hours (as though we were some sort of substation); lose packages that it claimed it delivered to me.
    Whatever happened to the 31st JANUARY deadline???
    Until this year [2009], the deadline for sending Form 1099-B, Proceeds From Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions, was Jan. 31, the same as for Form W-2 and other information reporting forms. Congress extended the deadline to Feb. 15 in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which also will require brokers to report the cost basis of securities sold, effective in phases starting in 2011.
    https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2009/feb/late1099bmailings/
    More generally, IRS deadlines (unless the financial institution requests an extension) are here:
    https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1099gi#en_US_2025_publink1000287056
    Until an institution has the information for an entire account, it will hold off on sending what would be an incomplete combined 1099. For various reasons, some funds are unable to provide complete information quickly and routinely request extensions. For example, in the past PRSVX has distributed some unrecaptured 1250 gains (box 2b). I suspect that it is because of the possibility of these distributions that TRP delays this fund's tax mailings.
    Here's TRP's complete mailing schedule (for investments held directly in mutual fund accounts)
    https://www.troweprice.com/personal-investing/resources/planning/tax/preparation/tax-mailing-schedule.html
    This year, Fidelity delayed sending me a combined 1099 because it was waiting on information from a money market fund, more specifically a Fidelity MMF!
  • Lipper Names CrossingBridge "Best Fixed Income Small Fund Family Group"
    I took a quick peek at BIEAX.
    There have been three years since 2015 where the fund's corresponding category and index had losses.
    BIEAX outperformed both on all three occasions.
    However, the fund did suffer a 2.05% loss in 2020 while the calendar/index gained less than 1%.
    Three of the portfolio managers have over 15 years tenure on the strategy (BIEAX inception date: 01/31/2011).
    The fund generated top decile returns for the trailing 3 year, 5 year, and 10 year periods according to M*.
    https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/bieax/performance
    Edit/Add: I almost forgot that Brandes International Equity was featured in a recent Barron's article.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/top-stocks/international-stocks-are-beating-the-u-s-how-one-fund-is-playing-it/ar-AA1Bdcw6
  • Lipper Names CrossingBridge "Best Fixed Income Small Fund Family Group"
    @sma3 and @Observant1: I'm not leaving CBLDX or NRDCX because I think CB is looking out for my capital. Still holding OSTIX, also.
    For LC international value, Brandes is my choice. BIEAX or its clone BINV are as highly rated as BISAX, do not suffer from asset bloat, and have the same long-term team successfully running them. Seems like a quality shop, maybe flying under the radar.
  • CDs and Money Markets
    @Dt. I am with you 100%. I am way more interested in return of my capital than return on capital. I watch the market with a sense of detachment I haven’t had since the sixties,,, when I cheered for the markets to crash. I too worry about the FDIC. My biggest concern is social security. If it were up to Dodick it would already be shut down. But the intent is pretty clear.
  • Lipper Names CrossingBridge "Best Fixed Income Small Fund Family Group"
    Artisan is usually conscientious regarding mutual fund capacity management.
    ARTKX closed to most new investors in 2007, reopened in 2009, and then closed again in 2011.
    The fund briefly reopened in March 2020 but was subsequently soft-closed in June 2021.
    M* places ARTKX in the Foreign Large Blend category.
    The fund has generated top decile returns for the trailing 3 year, 5 year, 10 year, and 15 year periods.
    https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/artkx/performance
    Edit/Add¹:
    "The strategy's asset base of USD 46.6 billion as of September 2024 was sizable,
    but its long-term orientation, large-cap emphasis, and quality focus help alleviate concerns.
    In recent years, the team has suppressed some holdings information to protect liquidity
    when it's entering and exiting positions.
    And finally, the fact that this group no longer supports the USD 29.4 billion Artisan Global Value
    strategy gives the team more leeway than it had before the 2018 team split."

    ¹ M* take on ARTKX asset base size
  • Buy Sell Why: ad infinitum.
    Sold CLF for short-term loss of 21% ... offset by realized gains elsewhere, thankfully.
    Total mistake on my part. 'nuff said.
  • FS Chiron Capital Allocation Fund will be liquidated
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1593547/000139834425005782/fp0092737-2_497.htm
    497 1 fp0092737-2_497.htm
    THE ADVISORS’ INNER CIRCLE FUND III
    (the “Trust”)
    FS Chiron Capital Allocation Fund
    (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated March 20, 2025 to the Fund’s Summary Prospectus (the “Summary
    Prospectus”), Prospectus (the “Prospectus”) and Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”),
    each dated March 1, 2025
    This supplement provides new and additional information beyond that contained in the Summary Prospectus, Prospectus and SAI, and should be read in conjunction with the Summary Prospectus, Prospectus and SAI.
    The Board of Trustees of the Trust, at the recommendation of FS Investments, the parent company of Chiron Investment Management, LLC (the “Adviser”), the investment adviser of the Fund, has approved a plan of liquidation providing for the liquidation of the Fund’s assets and the distribution of the net proceeds pro rata to the Fund’s shareholders. In connection therewith, the Fund is closed to investments from new and existing shareholders effective immediately. The Fund is expected to cease operations and liquidate on or about April 21, 2025 (the “Liquidation Date”). The Liquidation Date may be changed without notice at the discretion of the Trust’s officers.
    Prior to the Liquidation Date, shareholders may redeem (sell) their shares in the manner described in the “Purchasing, Selling and Exchanging Fund Shares – How to Sell Your Fund Shares” section of the Prospectus. For those Fund shareholders that do not redeem (sell) their shares prior to the Liquidation Date, the Fund will distribute to each such shareholder, on or promptly after the Liquidation Date, a liquidating cash distribution equal in value to the shareholder’s interest in the net assets of the Fund as of the Liquidation Date.
    In anticipation of the liquidation of the Fund, the Adviser may manage the Fund in a manner intended to facilitate the Fund’s orderly liquidation, such as by holding cash or making investments in other highly liquid assets. As a result, during this time, all or a portion of the Fund may not be invested in a manner consistent with its stated investment strategies, which may prevent the Fund from achieving its investment objective.
    The liquidation distribution amount will include any accrued income and capital gains, will be treated as a payment in exchange for shares and will generally be a taxable event for shareholders investing through taxable accounts. You should consult your personal tax advisor concerning your particular tax situation. Shareholders remaining in the Fund on the Liquidation Date will not be charged any transaction fees by the Fund. However, the net asset value of the Fund on the Liquidation Date will reflect costs of liquidating the Fund. Shareholders will receive liquidation proceeds as soon as practicable after the Liquidation Date.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
  • T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
    "Giroux feels the stock market broadly is expensive, has a higher-than-usual stake in US Treasuries,
    and has been building cash while waiting for more names to look attractive.
    In the meantime, he sees potential from his usual fare of contrarian positions,
    such as beaten-down UnitedHealthcare UNH and engineering software company PTC."

    https://www.morningstar.com/funds/t-rowes-giroux-keeps-beating-market-heres-where-hes-placing-his-bets
  • FOMC Statement, 3/19/25
    From The Barron's Daily
    :
    The Fed’s Outlook Should Have Spooked Markets. Why It Did the Opposite and 5 Other Things to Know Today.
    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell showed his strength as a market whisperer on Wednesday. Even though interest rates stayed the same, stocks rose by the most on a Fed decision day since last July.
    Most important, perhaps, was that Powell managed to avoid the ire of President Donald Trump. Sure, Trump posted that the Fed should be cutting after the decision. But it was a relatively mild rebuke that doesn’t suggest the central bank and the administration are on a collision course.
    The market’s embrace of Powell’s message is a bit of a puzzle. The projections still show just two quarter-point rate cuts this year, the same as in December. In fact, a closer examination shows the bias among rate setters has shifted toward fewer cuts—even though the median outlook is the same, fewer people see more than two cuts. What’s more, Powell was particularly eager to emphasize the uncertainty in the outlook.
    It gets worse. The Fed also raised its inflation forecasts and lowered projections for growth. That’s starting to sound a bit like stagflation, or inflation without economic growth, which isn’t good for stocks.
    But the market seemed to take this in its stride because Powell instilled confidence in other ways. First, the Fed eased plans to sell bonds back into the market, which is a subtle form of lowering borrowing costs. He also said that if tariffs were to cause an uptick in inflation, the Fed would be able to look through it as long as it’s “transitory.”
    That might be an unfortunate word choice. It was used to describe what was happening after the Covid-19 pandemic, which of course didn’t seem like short-lived inflation at all. But it’s true that the Fed could actually make things worse if it responds to temporary price gains that will blow over by themselves.
    Investors are right to be encouraged by Powell’s words. There is a lot to worry about these days—tariffs, wars, and rapid changes to government policies. At least Powell brings calm and flexibility in times of heightened market pain.