Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • The Issachar Fund will be liquidated
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1537140/000158064225005639/issachar_497.htm
    497 1 issachar_497.htm 497
    Lionx-Logo
    Class N Shares (LIONX)
    Class I Shares (LIOTX)
    (a series of Northern Lights Fund Trust III)
    Supplement dated August 29, 2025 to
    the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated February 1, 2025
    The Board of Trustees of Northern Lights Fund Trust III (the “Board”) has concluded that it is in the best interests of the Issachar Fund (the “Fund”) and its shareholders that the Fund cease operations. The Board has determined to close the Fund and redeem all outstanding shares on or about September 29, 2025 (“Redemption Date”).
    Effective immediately, the Fund will not accept any new investments, will no longer pursue its stated investment objective, and will begin liquidating its portfolio and will invest in cash equivalents such as money market funds until all shares have been redeemed. Any required distributions of income and capital gains will be distributed as soon as practicable to shareholders and reinvested in additional shares, unless you have previously requested payment in cash.
    Prior to or on the Redemption Date, you may redeem your shares, including reinvested distributions, in accordance with the “How to Redeem Shares” section in the Prospectus. Unless your investment in the Fund is through a tax-deferred retirement account, a redemption is subject to tax on any taxable gains. Please refer to the “Tax Status, Dividends and Distributions” section in the Prospectus for general information. You may wish to consult your tax advisor about your particular situation.
    ANY SHAREHOLDERS WHO HAVE NOT REDEEMED THEIR SHARES OF THE FUND PRIOR TO THE REDEMPTION DATE WILL HAVE THEIR SHARES AUTOMATICALLY REDEEMED AS OF THAT DATE, AND PROCEEDS WILL BE SENT TO THE ADDRESS OF RECORD. If you have questions or need assistance, please contact your financial advisor directly or the Fund at 1-866-787-8355.
    This Supplement, and the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated February 1, 2025, provide relevant information for all shareholders and should be retained for future reference. Both the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference and can be obtained without charge by calling the Fund at 1-866-787-8355.
  • DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund to be reorganized
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1480207/000119312525192866/d21840d497.htm
    497 1 d21840d497.htm 497
    DOUBLELINE FUNDS TRUST
    DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated August 29, 2025 to the Fund’s Summary Prospectus
    (the “Summary Prospectus”), Prospectus (the “Prospectus”) and
    Statement of Additional Information (the “SAI”), each dated July 31, 2025,
    as supplemented from time to time
    This supplement provides new and additional information beyond that contained in the Summary Prospectus, Prospectus and SAI and should be read in conjunction with the Summary Prospectus, Prospectus and SAI.
    The Board of Trustees of DoubleLine Funds Trust (the “Board”) approved a proposal under which, subject to shareholder approval, the Fund would be merged with and into the American Beacon DoubleLine Floating Rate Income Fund (the “Acquiring Fund”), a series of the American Beacon Funds (the “Transaction”). The Fund and Acquiring Fund have substantially similar principal investment strategies and have the same portfolio management team. DoubleLine Capital LP, the adviser to the Fund, serves as the sub-adviser to the Acquiring Fund. American Beacon Advisors, Inc. serves as the investment adviser to the Acquiring Fund. Completion of the proposed Transaction, often called a “fund adoption,” is subject to, among other things, approval by the shareholders of the Fund.
    If approved by the Fund’s shareholders, the proposed Transaction is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2026, although this timeline is subject to adjustment. A Combined Proxy Statement and Prospectus related to a special meeting of shareholders of the Fund is expected to be sent to shareholders of the Fund in the fourth quarter of 2025. Those materials will describe the Transaction in more detail and the reasons for the Board’s approval of the proposed Transaction. Shareholders of the Fund should watch for the arrival of these important materials. This supplement is not a proxy and is not soliciting any proxy, which can only be done by means of a proxy statement.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
  • Getting Hard to Find 4% CDs
    Being retired at age of 77, I have enjoyed the last few years of finding CDs which pay at least 4% interest. I looked at Schwab this week, and it is almost impossible to find a noncallable CD paying 4% interest. I have been getting over 4% from Schwab Money Market accounts, but I would like to have some CDs to replace those maturing, and retain some FDIC protections. In my Taxable Schwab account, I have chosen to increase my investments in private banks and credit unitions. I just bought a 100k CD at Capital One for 4.2%, and have started looking at other banks for some of my Schwab holdings.
  • One fund solution update
    One fund is I suppose a worthy endeavor. I considered it - and gave up the idea sometime around 2020-21. The fund I had in mind was TRRIX a 40 (equity) 60 (fixed income) fund. In hindsight it was a fortunate decision not to go ahead because that fund had an uncharacteristically bad year (-13%) in 2022. A lesson in how even very “conservative” (previously deemed “safe”) funds can lose more than 10% in a year when the markets team up against them.
    If one feels they have the mental acuity, knowledge & time I’d say go with several equally weighted funds designed to off-set each other in volatile times. 3 is a number you commonly hear. My favorite number is 7 (positions), equally weighted and including a cash position. Rebalance periodically. On a portfolio tracker pie-chart they migrate around as their fortunes rise and fall - a source of interest or amusement to duller minds like mine.
    OTOH - if one is reaching a point for whatever reason where that’s no longer an option, chunk it all in cash / cash alts or one of the several good options offered up by others. Cash is not a bad choice as some have attested to in this thread. Sounds like the wife is an important consideration. Discuss with her and see what she might feel comfortable maintaining in your absence.
  • Oakmark has ETFs in registration
    Mutual fund AUM has been flat even with capital growth. ETF AUM has doubled in like 4 years. Mutual funds hold 22 trillion dollars. ETF's 10 trillion (what 5 trillion in 2021).
    OAKMX in 2015 had 18 billion in AUM. if flows were even over the past 10 years, its theoretical growth would be 65 billion in AUM. HOWEVER, its only today 23 billion in AUM. which is almost 1/3 of what it should be.
    So I think they see the writing on the wall. its time to play ball.
  • One fund solution update
    My one-fund for the capital appreciation bucket is SGIIX. TIBIX would be an alternative.
  • One fund solution update
    @Sven…. You are correct. This is about capital appreciation,,, or inflation protection or for sport. No income need. The last few years we have been fine with CD’s and money market but really that bucket is just risk off. My one fund is the risk bucket. But as I am realizing one fund is just not any fun.
  • Intel stock spikes after report of possible u.s. government stake
    there is an inspiring list of innovations spouted by trump to industries of all flavors, him being a unique expert in all.
    my take is that AMD is more than happy for intel to be forced to act on strategic advice from trump and his anti-STEM MAGA morons.
    m.leder, noted forensic analyst on SEC postings, came from behind her paywall to comment on intel's CYA statement regarding the coercion. some clips....
    ...a lot to unpack in this risk factor and any number of parties that could potentially sue. But I love the nuanced language of “given the scarcity of recent US precedents”.
    Really? The government doesn’t take 10% stakes in major American companies that employ over 100,000 people with virtually zero planning based on some tweet... I'm shocked, shocked! Based on today's close, it seems clear as if the promised cash infusion did nothing to boost Intel’s stock price, so it will be interesting to see what impact this has over the next few months and years.
    I also thought the risk factor stating that there’s no requirement for the $8.9 billion infusion to be made by a certain date, although the 94-page filing spells out a closing date of Aug. 26 was worth noting. As too was the risk factor that the tax, accounting and financial impacts are uncertain and being evaluated!

    linkedin.com
    in short, intel is saying they have no idea, and by this disclosure take no liability regarding impact on legalities, capital deployment, taxes, and accounting.
    SHAREHOLDERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
  • One fund solution update
    @larryB, i presume your social security and pension cover the entire expense. And these two funds are for capital appreciation, correct?
    If not, do you have another bucket to generate income to supplement the monthly income needs ?
  • Examining 10 Years of Stock Performance by Sector
    A scorecard for M* US equity sector indexes lists calendar-year returns starting in 2015.
    Not suprisingly, technology has been a frequent winner.
    The energy sector underperformed all other sectors from 2017-2020
    but gained the most in 2016, 2021, and 2022.
    Industrials, consumer defensives, and financials were neither at the top
    nor at the bottom of the performance charts during this period.
    Healthcare has really struggled due to policy concerns and other issues.
    https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/6-key-takeaways-examining-10-years-stock-performance-by-sector
  • The dictator is now advising restaurants
    this is worse
    "George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America," Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday morning.
    That's what Biden and Garland should've done between 2020-2024 against Donnie and the J6'ers and MAGA ringleaders. But noooooo, they were trapped in amber, looking for a return to an age of Washington politics that no longer exists.
  • You're buying stocks where? But Europe Is Losing ...
    European market is still growing but at a slower rate comparing to US, and the valuation is more reasonable.
    Oddly enough, the international MF, JOHIX (of the JOHCM family of funds), which has a substantial European stake, is my best performing MF so far this year at 18.9%. It seems to do well in questionable markets. The last time it did well, in 2020/2021 (!), there was a considerable sell-off that created crazy CGs for 2021. Might there be a repeat his year?
  • Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund being converted into an ETF
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/711080/000119312525187688/d33953d497.htm
    497 1 d33953d497.htm 497
    TOUCHSTONE STRATEGIC TRUST
    Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated August 25, 2025 to the Prospectus, Summary Prospectus,
    and Statement of Additional Information dated October 28, 2024
    IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING CHANGES TO THE FUND
    Proposed Reorganization
    At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Touchstone Strategic Trust (the “Trust”) held on August 14, 2025, Touchstone Advisors, Inc. (“Touchstone”) proposed, and the Board approved, converting the Fund into an exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) by the reorganization of the Fund into a new ETF (“Acquiring ETF”), which upon filing and regulatory approval will be a newly-created fund in the Touchstone family of funds, (the “Reorganization”). At the same Board meeting, the Board approved the appointment of the Fund’s sub-adviser, DSM Capital Partners, LLC, as sub-adviser to the Acquiring ETF. The Board also approved the Acquiring ETF’s investment goal and principal investment strategies and risks, which will be identical to the Fund’s investment goal and principal investment strategies and risks. The Acquiring ETF, however, will be subject to certain risks unique to operating as an ETF.
    Additional information about the Acquiring ETF will be available in the first quarter of 2026. The Acquiring ETF will not commence operations prior to the Reorganization and the Acquiring ETF’s shares are not currently being offered to the public, nor have they been approved for listing on any exchange. You can obtain a copy of the prospectus or SAI for the Acquiring ETF, once available, by visiting the website at TouchstoneInvestments.com/ETFs, by calling (833) 368-7383, or by contacting your financial adviser.
    Following the Reorganization, Touchstone has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to ensure the Acquiring ETF’s total annual operating expenses (excluding dividend and interest expenses relating to short sales; interest; taxes; brokerage commissions and other transaction costs; portfolio transaction and investment-related expenses; expenses associated with the Acquiring ETF’s interfund lending program, if any; other expenditures which are capitalized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; the cost of “Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses,” if any; and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of business) are limited to 0.67% of average daily net assets. The Reorganization does not require shareholder approval and is expected to be tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
    Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, the Fund would transfer all of its assets to the Acquiring ETF in exchange for shares of the Acquiring ETF. The Acquiring ETF would also assume all of the Fund's liabilities. The shares of the Acquiring ETF would then be distributed to the Fund's shareholders, and the Fund would be terminated. It is anticipated that, prior to the Reorganization Class A, Class C and Class Y shares of the Fund will be converted into Institutional Class shares of the Fund. After the Reorganization, shareholders may only purchase or sell shares of the Acquiring ETF on a national securities exchange at prevailing market prices through a broker-dealer.
    A prospectus/information statement containing more information regarding the Reorganization will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and once effective, will be mailed to Fund shareholders in the first quarter of 2026. The Reorganization is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2026. Expenses associated with the Reorganization will be borne by Touchstone.
  • ETF Proliferation
    July 7, 2025 issue of Barron's had a cover story on this deluge of ETFs.
    https://ybbpersonalfinance.proboards.com/board/12/weekly-business-digests
    My summary from Weekend Business Digest 1:
    "COVER STORY, “ETFs Are Eating the World. The Right – and Wrong – Ways to Invest”. It’s hard to imagine an investment idea or theme without a related ETF. There are 4,000+ ETFs in the US, 700+ were added just in 2024, and several hundred are pending before the SEC. Note that there are only 2,400 listed stocks in the US (but there are many ETFs for single-stocks). Many mutual funds/OEFs are adding ETF classes after Vanguard’s patent expired in 2023. Almost 1,300+ active ETFs are competing with active OEFs. Many new ETFs won’t survive because viable ETFs need $100+ million AUM. There have been strong inflows, and the total ETF AUM is $11 trillion, and almost 33.3% of all listed funds (OEFs, ETFs) excluding the money-market funds (CEFs are too tiny to move the needle). Lot of money is just shifting from OEFs into ETFs.
    The ETFs has several advantages: (i) tax-efficiency (due to tax-free creation/redemption), (ii) accessibility, (iii) trading convenience, (iv) lower ERs; big ETFs are very liquid. Many financial advisors now prefer to use ETFs for asset allocation. On the other hand, there is more temptation to trade and reinvestments are inconvenient.
    Top 4 ETF sponsors/firms (Vanguard, BlackRock/BLK, Invesco/IVZ, State Street/STT) have 82% of the total ETF AUM, so there is lot of noise out there. Major stock ETFs are SPY, IVV, VOO (SP500); RSP (equal-weight SP500), IEFA (EAFE), VT (total world stock), NOBL (dividend Aristocrats), TCAF (capital appreciation), etc. Major bond ETFs are AGG, BND (US aggregate bond); BNDW (total world bond), MUNI (intermediate-term munis), JCPI (inflation-protected), ANGL (fallen-angle HY), etc. Major alternative ETFs are GLD, GLDM (gold bullion); IBIT, FBTC (spot Bitcoin), etc.
    There are flaws in some of these ETFs. Some bond, private-asset and commodity ETFs are in small, fragmented and illiquid markets that trade infrequently or not at all. The ETF pricing then is based on matrix-pricing or professional estimates/ guesses that may break down during market stresses. Most commodity ETFs hold futures because it isn’t practical to hold physical commodities except for some precious metals. This adds the complications of backwardation/ contango at future rolls. Also beware that ETFs can hold only up to 15% in private, illiquid assets, so pay attention to what the rest 85% is in. Then, there are leveraged ETFs, +/- 1x, +/- 2x, etc, often in pairs, so the firms make money whether investors have gains or losses."
    Barron's (subscription) https://www.barrons.com/articles/etfs-funds-investing-f38dc17a
  • Longleaf International Fund being reorganized
    From an email ("August 2025 update") I received this morning:
    For 50 years, Southeastern Asset Management (SAM) has been a disciplined value investor through multiple market environments. We remain confident in our belief that bottom-up stock selection is the best approach to preserving capital and generating returns. Three years ago, SAM started making process improvements based on lessons we have learned over the years. As we wrote then, we had been better stock pickers than portfolio and risk managers before these changes started taking hold. Our goal has been to get back to the strong results we delivered for most of our history. We have seen meaningful signs that we are heading in the right direction on multiple fronts. Today, we are announcing additional changes:
    1. We are merging the Longleaf International Fund into the Longleaf Global Fund. The go-forward Global Fund will be run in-line with our current Global approach, allowing us to focus more on our best ideas. We have seen solid returns in the Global Fund since our initial round of changes in late 2022, and we will now own more of this strategy ourselves. As part of this tax-free merger, Global Fund fees will be reduced and capped at a level commensurate with the Small-Cap Fund (95 basis points). We will be sending additional materials on this transaction to our International and Global Fund shareholders in the coming days and weeks. If approved by shareholders, the merger will be finalized December 2025 at the latest.1 Please see the August 25, 2025 Prospectus Supplement for additional information (https://regdocs.blugiant.com/longleaf/).
    2. We are closing our Concentrated Europe strategy and investing our internal funds from it into our go-forward Longleaf Funds. As we like to see at our individual investee companies, this is a meaningful insider purchase of our go-forward strategies and an increase in our focus. Our Asia Pacific strategy will continue to operate under Ken Siazon.
    3. With these changes, John Woodman and Alicia Scarratt will be departing SAM at the end of September. We thank them for their time with us. Our continuing researchers have come up the curve in productivity and non-US coverage. Manish Sharma has been our best researcher outside of the US and will be gaining increased responsibility in the newly created position of Head of Non-US Research. Julio Utrera will be taking on an expanded role covering stocks in Europe, where he has done a great job for us. Separately, Peter Montgomery has recently rejoined our client service and development team to help us grow at the right times when we have qualifying investments. He was with us in the early 2010s, so he is familiar with our value approach as well as with SAM’s internal workings.
    Our go-forward research team has made strong stock picks for the last 10+ years, with mid-teens-plus annualized results at a statistically significant level. We are glad to discuss this with you at a level of detail that would not fit within this note. This data lines up with our returns from our first 30 years. We have been encouraged as well with our improvements in portfolio building. While there have not been many market tests in recent times, Longleaf Partners, Small-Cap and Global Funds materially outperformed during the volatile mid-February through April period earlier this year.
    “I’m excited about where SAM is heading. After delivering excess returns for the first three-plus decades of our 50-year history, we lagged our own goals and many of yours in some of the subsequent years. In recent years, Ross has taken definitive steps to improve our investing and our focus. We have an exceptionally talented analytical team. Under Ross’s portfolio management and research leadership, I’m most confident we will produce outstanding results,” said Mason Hawkins, Founder and Chairman of SAM.
    “Our Business, People, Price approach to investing works over the long term because it’s rational, as the underlying numbers show. We will stay true to SAM’s Governing Principles while continuing to improve as we grow,” said Ross Glotzbach, CEO and Head of Research at SAM.
    We thank you for your partnership and are looking forward to our next 50 years.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    @Sven. I don’t hear much discussion about the period between growing one’s capital and the “deaccumulating phase.” For lack of a better term I call it the preservation phase. After growing and before long term care.
    Yes, everyone's circumstances are different. Some of us, I know, for a long-ish period of time, took from Peter in order to pay Paul, while deliberately delaying the onset of receiving S.S.
    I just could never contemplate engaging in such a balancing-act, but it works for some. Yes, I'm in preservation-mode. I do not bet that I will reach de-accumulation. Not because of the calendar, but because current earned income will not be stopping anytime soon. We are free to spend more than we did, but unless there's another GFC or Great Depression, growth and dividends make up for it, by the time December rolls around.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    @Sven. I don’t hear much discussion about the period between growing one’s capital and the “deaccumulating phase.” For lack of a better term I call it the preservation phase. After growing and before long term care.
  • You're buying stocks where? But Europe Is Losing ...
    There have been many discussions here lately on the preference for European over U.S. stocks. At 86, I'm strictly in MMkt, CD, and Treasury income, so have no horse in this race. But seeing this report in The Wall Street Journal made me sit up and take notice. The WSJ link should be free, and perhaps it will be of interest to some here at MFO.
    Today Europe, particularly Western Europe, finds itself adrift, an aging continent slowly losing economic, military and diplomatic clout.
    • The continent’s economies have been largely stagnant for about 15 years, likely the longest such streak since the Industrial Revolution, according to calculations by Deutsche Bank. Germany’s economy is 1% bigger than it was at the end of 2017, while the U.S. economy has grown 19%.
    • Europe’s share of global economic output, measured in current dollars, fell from roughly 33% to 23% between 2005 and 2024, according to World Bank data.
    • The long stretch of weak European growth has opened up a big gap in incomes between the U.S. and Europe. European household wealth has grown by a third as much as Americans’ since 2009. Per capita GDP in the U.S. is now $86,000 a year, versus $56,000 for Germany and $53,000 for the U.K.
    • In the absence of economic growth, Europe’s welfare states, which account for half the planet’s welfare spending, will come under growing strain from aging populations. The average European is nearly 45 years old, compared with 39 for the average American, and the continent’s working-age population is predicted to fall by nearly 50 million by 2050, leaving fewer workers to pay for more retirees.
    “Europe needs to wake up, or it’s dead in so many ways,” says Tracy Blackwell, the retiring CEO of Pension Insurance Corporation, a U.K. asset manager.
    Or as JP Morgan chief Jamie Dimon said at a recent speech in Dublin, “You’re losing.”
    Said British historian Niall Ferguson in March: “What was the status quo? The Americans provide our security, the Russians provide our energy, and the Chinese provide our export market. Guess what? It’s all gone,”
    As Italy’s prime minister Giorgia Meloni puts it, “America innovates, China imitates, Europe regulates.”
    Bad luck and bad policy
    In the past 15 years, a key engine of European growth—manufactured exports—has been hobbled by events beyond its control, including U.S.-led trade wars, China’s mercantilist policies and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which sent European energy prices skyrocketing.
    • In Germany, industrial electricity costs three times as much as in the U.S.; in the U.K., four times as much.
    • Ten years ago, four European companies ranked in the global top 10 by revenues. Today, the continent’s biggest company by market value, German software firm SAP, ranks 28th.
    • America’s share of global stock market valuations has held steady at 48% since 2000, but the EU’s has fallen from 18% to 10%, and the U.K.’s from 8.3% to 2.6%, according to Deutsche Bank.
    Europe’s economic slide has been accompanied by shriveling military prowess. Though European leaders are now vowing to take defense more seriously in the face of a revanchist Russia, they are struggling to build up their forces. Britain’s entire army can fit comfortably inside Wembley Stadium.
    Mario Draghi, a former top European central banker, proposed a series of steps in a landmark EU report last year. But the proposals immediately ran into resistance. “You say no to public debt, you say no to the single market, you say no to creating the capital market union. You can’t say no to everything,” a clearly frustrated Draghi said in a speech to European lawmakers in February. “So when you ask me, ‘What is best to do now?’ I say, ‘I have no idea. But do something!’”

    Without more economic growth, European governments will have to choose between ever-higher taxes and massive cuts to welfare. That is because an aging population means much higher healthcare and pension costs, paid for by a working-age population projected to shrink by some 2 million a year on average through 2050, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels.
    Meanwhile, the current strategy of financing welfare spending with taxes and debt is running out of road. Tax revenue as a share of economic output is already around 38% in Germany, 43% in Italy and 44% in France, compared with 25% in the U.S., according to OECD data. The U.K.’s annual debt interest bill stands at nearly $150 billion, twice as much as defense. Borrowing costs have already risen in the U.K. as debt approaches 100% of yearly economic output.
    There are exceptions. Sweden has quietly spurred economic growth by cutting back its welfare state—tightening government spending, revamping the pension system and slashing corporate and personal tax rates. Per capita incomes are now climbing, and the country has seen a burst of entrepreneurship.
    But in most of Europe, such reforms are proving to be a big ask. Europeans consistently vote for politicians who protect the status quo and expand the welfare state. In France, which hasn’t balanced its national budget in more than 50 years, government spending is around 57% of GDP, compared with 36% for the U.S.
    Appeared in the August 23, 2025, print edition as 'Europe Is Losing Can Europe Reverse Its Long Slide?'.
    Notes: The above edited excerpts are a severely abridged version of the actual Wall Street Journal report. Some text emphasis was added to various quotes.
  • You May Already Have Crypto in your Mutual Fund
    From the linked article:
    More than 100 publicly traded companies now have some crypto assets on their balance sheets. None owns more than Strategy MSTR (formerly known as MicroStrategy), a pioneer of this trend. The firm first started investing in bitcoin in August 2020 and now owns more than 600,000 bitcoins, or roughly $70 billion at current prices. That’s more than 60% of the firm’s market cap, so the stock’s fortunes rely almost entirely on bitcoin. The stock moved almost lockstep with bitcoin until 2024, when Strategy’s growth skyrocketed and began trading at a substantial premium.
    Is-cryptocurrency-already-hiding-your-retirement-account?
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    Risk is a very important consideration in my opinion.
    I recall when IOFIX and SEMMX were touted as being "cash subs."
    Both of these funds subsequently generated significant losses during Q1 2020.
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/comment/150158/#Comment_150158