Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Less is Less at WSJ Quarterly Fund Analysis

This quarter's WSJ Investing in Funds & ETFS demonstrates the paper's reduced coverage. "Category Kings in 16 Realms" no longer lists the 10 top performing funds in their categories, only the top 5. Maybe I'm the only traditional subscriber left and the only one who cares. I used to enjoy perusing the top 10 lists, but top 5 lists are meh. Come to think of it, my subscription this year is costing me $20 more than last year. I'm not getting much more than fire starter these days, a role that Barron's used to play in my household.

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.