Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
Thanks, Crash! It appears that Gabbard's office is stonewalling. Here's a link to the WSJ source article on MSN.
"The lengthy delay on sending the complaint to Congress is without known precedent, according to watchdog experts and former intelligence officials. The inspector general is generally required to assess whether the complaint is credible within two weeks of receiving it, and share it with lawmakers within another week if it determines it is credible."
"'From my experience, it is confounding for [Gabbard’s office] to take weeks—let alone eight months— to transmit a disclosure to Congress,' Bakaj, who is chief legal counsel at the nonprofit WhistleblowerAid.org, said in a statement."
Comments
It appears that Gabbard's office is stonewalling.
Here's a link to the WSJ source article on MSN.
"The lengthy delay on sending the complaint to Congress is without known precedent,
according to watchdog experts and former intelligence officials.
The inspector general is generally required to assess whether the complaint is credible within two weeks
of receiving it, and share it with lawmakers within another week if it determines it is credible."
"'From my experience, it is confounding for [Gabbard’s office] to take weeks—let alone eight months—
to transmit a disclosure to Congress,' Bakaj, who is chief legal counsel at the nonprofit WhistleblowerAid.org,
said in a statement."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/classified-whistleblower-complaint-about-tulsi-gabbard-stalls-within-her-agency/ar-AA1VtLIb