Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
I think the spike has been written about...and debated. (eg, Montier). Some say it was an anomaly and should be ignored. I vote to ignore it...along with the entire 51% drawdown .
Comments
what happens when a company actually does not have a P/E ratio. Do they just ignore it in calculation or what???