It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
ding. ring that bell.@FD1000 Sure, and while we're at it, why don't we get corporate money, lobbying and influence out of politics altogether: https://washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/08/31/business-lobbying-democrats-reconciliation/
Oh, wait.
@Observant
Trump fund raising for the pretext of fighting alleged election fraud...
I thought fine print may be involved!
Just because it's legal and a common practice doesn't make it right.
absolutely.
I thought fine print may be involved!@Observant
Trump fund raising for the pretext of fighting alleged election fraud but not actually using most of the funds for said fraud was fully legal because the fund raise page stated this in the fine print. It's amazing how much one can legally get away in this country by putting the main headline in size 16 font and all the fine print in size 10 font.
Certainly Trump isn't the only one who does it, this is a widely prevalent practice.
Probable, even. There has got to be money made in period tracking! My adult daughter asked if women now could (or should) wear cute service-animal vests, so I am thinking of a startup as part of these ETFs.Yet somehow in 2022 it seems possible. You should insist on crypto for all prepayments.
I don't see it, can't find it--- apart from their pre-formed 10-year performance chart.Does investor.morningstar.com still has "chart"?
Consider that the nation itself was founded on political activism, celebrates political discourse and the freedom to have it in its first amendment and its founders generally wanted “god” out of our politics. Moreover, I imagine the folks who owned the tea companies weren’t too happy about all that tea dumped in the water and it was “destructive to shareholder value,” yet I doubt many Americans would’ve thought it unpatriotic to do so.The Sub-Adviser analyzes an initial universe of large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies with market capitalizations of at least $1 billion. The Sub-Adviser then screens out companies that, in the Sub-Adviser’s assessment, have emphasized political activism and social agendas at the expense of maximizing shareholder returns in the Sub-Adviser’s assessment. For example, the Sub-Adviser will generally exclude companies that make public statements about a then-current political hot button item unrelated to their business (e.g., companies that issue press releases in response to U.S. Supreme Court rulings).
https://etftrends.com/buffered-etfs-a-comprehensive-guide/When Innovator launched the first defined outcome or “buffered” ETFs in August of 2018, I will admit I was a bit skeptical. Historically, ETFs that mirrored the kinds of outcomes long the province of structured products hadn’t been very successful at gathering assets. But I was hopeful: I believed then, and I believe now, that ETFs that shape the pattern of returns available in the risk markets are incredibly useful tools.
With over $4 billion in assets (half of that coming just this year), I think it’s safe to say my skepticism was unnecessary, and my enthusiasm rewarded. But with over 50 buffered ETFs available in the market now, we thought it would be useful to put together a guide to how the products work, how you might use them, and what’s available.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla
