13 years is long enough to make a few investors rich along the way. Who are the current Peter Lynches in their 3rd or 4th innings?

I guess he’s been spilling his guts on CNBC. But CNBC has become impossible to link or view without a paid subscription. (Interview referenced was in late September)
Here’s a decent article summarizing Grantham’s comments.
Here’s a 10-minute discussion / analysis based on a few clips from the CNBC interview. The presenter is decent - but clearly promoting his internet based investor service,.

My advice would be to exercise due diligence and look at your holdings one by one. I’m mostly a bottom feeder, so tend to own things that are pretty beaten up and out of favor. The biggest exception I could find is my commodities fund, BRCAX, up 32% for one year. However, looking back 5 and 10 years the fund has only garnered single digit returns. And, as @BenWP will testify, my single largest holding, TMSRX, appears to be anything but a euphoric bubble. :)
Bonds are a bit troubling. Not sure what kind of duration my allocation funds have, but my direct bond fund holdings are intermediate term (generally 2-5 years). My issue here with Grantham (and other experts) is that I think if equities hit the bricks, the economy will grind to a near halt and intermediate / long bonds will rise in value - albeit for a brief period. But - might be wrong.
However, I agree with most of what Grantham says and respect his knowledge. For defense, I’ve been looking at various defensive funds. None is a “panacea”. All are problematic in some way - - perhaps the reason he stresses cash for defense.

I think @stillers meant to post this PV chart, LINK .

@stillers - it auto defaults to 1985 but the results themselves are constrained by the earliest fund in the comparison. Because I chose SPY vs. Vanguard 500 Index, it started from 1994 vs. 1990 if I had chosen Vanguard. Nevertheless (as opposed to nonetheless)- the results are just impressive all the same. The graphs look a bit different on PV vs. Stock Charts but the results are the same. FWIW I own 2 of the 3 funds mentioned and couldn't be happier. Let's hope the good times continue to roll. Cheers.
Edit Add: May nothing ever change with FDGRX. Has been just stellar for me for many years.

@catch22 yes the PV chart looks a bit different but those funds are impressive all the same.

JT and Peter Lynch are the two PMs most responsible for my early retirement.
Not sure why your PV link uses 1985-2021. FLPSX incepted 12/27/89. So I changed the Start Year to 1990.
Also, your use of SPY as a Benchmark is noted on the results to limit its data to 01/90-10/21. So I changed the Benchmark to the VG 500 Index.
Here are the revised, far more impressive results that compare FLPSX to the three other funds since FLPSX's inception, a time at which my wife and I had it and Magellan as our only two funds. We shortly thereafter parted with Magellan.
EDIT: Deleted previous LINK. Having trouble getting the correct link posted here. See LINK at YBB's post below. Thanks YBB!

Those large differences in yearend distributions do look strange.
The VG TDF and VG Institutional TDF series are distinct (i.e., not classes of same portfolios), but they have similar glide-paths and portfolio managements except for different ERs, minimums and client bases. I looked at turnovers, and strangely, Institutional TDF have higher turnover.
My guess is that large difference in yearend distributions may be related to the merger of regular VG TDF and VG Institutional TDF by 02/2022. Their tax-cost ratios may be different. Unfortunately, the news related to the merger is silent on this aspect.
https://pressroom.vanguard.com/news/Press-Release-Vanguard-to-Lower-Investor-Costs-by-an-Estimated-190M-Through-Enhancements-to-TRFs-092821.html

When looking at retirement funds, investor & institutional , why the large difference in % dividend ?
VITVX 2.87% VS VTXVX 9.75% 2015 year.
VITWX 1.93 % VS VTWNX 13.94% 2020 year
Thanks, Derf

NESIX is also available at T Rowe Price brokerage for a minimum of $1000 and NTF.

Is there any way of seeing what funds TRP offers NTF without having a brokerage account?

That's a good question. Not to my knowledge, unfortunately. But in the last 12 months it seems TRP has expanded the number of funds available and increased considerably the number of funds available with NTF. This year I was able to buy three funds that were unavailable last year and two more that were available but had transaction fees. All five I was able to buy with NTF.
You are welcome to PM me a list of funds (or note them below) and I will check for you. Certain fund families like Fidelity, Vanguard, and Dodge & Cox have always had a $35 fee at TRP.

@catch22 yes the PV chart looks a bit different but those funds are impressive all the same.
Link: SPY vs. FDGRX, FLPSX, FCNTX

M* puts FLPSX "under review" due to this future change. https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1068330/longtime-manager-of-fidelity-low-priced-stock-to-retire

We probably haven’t noticed these food price increases because we eat only plant-based foods. I did hear an anecdote on the news about a rib roast costing $100 this year. Shortages in the stores are definitely affecting our shopping, however.

NESIX is also available at T Rowe Price brokerage for a minimum of $1000 and NTF.

Is there any way of seeing what funds TRP offers NTF without having a brokerage account?

You are highlighting Fidelity’s best active managers. Can you imagine what these funds would perform with a smaller asset, say 10% of the current level?

Not to disagree profusely. But spend 30 minutes in a grocery store. Check out the meat prices. (I suppose one can alway eat cake.)
Meatflation
Excerpt -“Amid a higher than expected 6.2% increase in consumer prices in October compared to the same month last year, the price of meat, poultry, fish and eggs rose 11.9%, the fastest increase since December 1990, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday, with beef prices up 20.1% and pork up 14.1%, adding to concerns …”
Is this food inflation only transitory? Related to chip shortages, or tie ups at ports, or truck drivers smoking pot and losing their CDLs?

while partisan negativism and disconnect rule --- 'you all are doing lousy, but I'm okay'
https://messaging-custom-newsletters.nytimes.com/template/oakv2?campaign_id=116&emc=edit_pk_20211116&instance_id=45534&nl=paul-krugman&productCode=PK&regi_id=22268089&segment_id=74534&te=1&uri=nyt://newsletter/a5d0f636-fbe8-5e35-b2ac-ce6bcee237b8&user_id=83d45440ead1d14c2a89a1e7221337d1

“The value of overall retail purchases increased 1.7% last month, the most in seven months”
Article #1 - Access May be restricted
Article #2 Better Source
Before you pour yourself a cold one, keep in mind that some / all of that increase was due to higher prices - depending which index or observor you believe. …

Just for the heck of it, the 3 funds.....versus SPY.
CHART for the 3 funds starting at Jan., 1999 to date. The inception dates were much earlier, but this is a chart limit for the site. One could always play with PV, Portfolio Visualizer for the full time view.
And yes, @Sven; FIDO has a deep bench for talent and research.

Shiller p/e about to touch 40, regular SP500 p/e 30
Allan Roth today tweets about the new M* 3.3% SWR guidance (30y lifespan; probably already posted here)
https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1066569/whats-a-safe-retirement-spending-rate-for-the-decades-ahead

FWIW, for those who may be in invested FLPSX or considering. All will be well, IMHO.
Article

:) Not sure where I am …
Likely 40 / 30 / 30 Equity / Bond / Other
(or something along those lines)
Re Electronic online gambling in Michigan - Markets are so exciting haven’t even bothered to watch a BB game or wager on anything.
Re DFKG / Per earlier post, unloaded small position around 11/6 after NY approved their operation - but with a 51% state tax on earnings. Since than it has fallen from the mid $40s to under $39 at one point this morning. Hope folks aren’t sitting on a big slug by way of C Wood’s Ark fund.
Wishing Catch and everybody here investing success!