Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Wasatch re-opens six funds
    The “Parent” tab in the link for WGROX that yogi provided shows current year assets for Wasatch at $12.49B with net outflows of $0.70B for 2022. You can get a sense of what each fund’s outflow is just from the M* bar charts. I don’t know for sure, but I believe that the CG tax bill for the SCG funds I have been holding is going to be high for this tax year. Buying a fallen angel this year could result in pain come April 15, 2023.
  • Pessimism is deepening as bellwether companies warn of worsening economic and business conditions.
    Ty for the heads up
    Not sure what to do now
    - wait w cash /buy more CDs hoping crisis will pass
    -pick solid companies (etfs funds you believe in) w good low Prices/ p.e. keep dca/buy into them (like faang stocks sp500 brkb Costco ev CMG target hd Walmart fdx etc) because they maybe at steep discounts
    - or do nothing /go away keep waiting, don't check on daily basis and maybe wake up in 16 24 months and see your portfolio maybe +10 +20%....
    Not sure what to make if it but Late Fridays especially afternoon and after hr see lots buying actions and indexes close near 50d MA.... Sentiments extremely poor and smart monies-big whales maybe buying again soon since they did possibly oversold past few wks after Jackson Hole. No one really know
    Loosing $$ extremely hard but you probably cannot do anything much. One friend mine computer engineer has brother own hedge funds, that brother been very sad recent last 10 months, his fund bellied up --25% because very high risk tradings/options and leveraged trades/margin call.... But he said keep at it, once market turn (and it will turn) , you may make $$ in 2 -4 yrs... Sit tight...
  • Pessimism is deepening as bellwether companies warn of worsening economic and business conditions.
    Following are excerpts from a New York Times article, heavily edited for brevity:
    A parade of prominent investors and corporate executives have made it clear that they believed the worst was yet to come for the economy and financial markets.
    After hitting a low in June, the S&P 500 had rallied more than 17 percent into mid-August, before losing steam again. The sell-off this week leaves the index just 5.6 percent above the bottom reached in June, after a fall of 0.7 percent on Friday that brought its weekly losses close to 5 percent. The market has only dropped 5 percent in a week three times this year.
    Yet even after the swift decline this week, some of the most powerful trading houses in the world, deploying trillions of dollars on behalf of pension funds, governments and other investors, are warning that there is more pain ahead.
    “If you asked me a year ago, ‘What is the worst scenario for financial markets?’ I think things are now worse than anything we could have imagined,” said the head of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the largest of its kind. The fund manages money generated by Norway’s extensive oil and gas sales and has $1.4 trillion invested around the world.
    Business leaders, policymakers and ordinary Americans are all grappling with the end of a decade of rock-bottom interest rates that helped propel the economy after the 2008 financial crisis, and a shift to a much-less familiar, once-in-a-generation burst of inflation. Crimped supply chains, the war in Ukraine and an emerging energy crisis are among a host of challenges that add to a level of uncertainty that some investors say they have not seen in decades.
    The drop on Friday came as the stock of logistics giant FedEx cratered more than 21 percent, after it warned that its profit was being hit by weakness in Asia and Europe. FedEx said that it would cut some services, close locations and freeze hiring, becoming the latest in a string of companies that have gone public with their concerns and rattled investor confidence.
    FedEx is seen as an economic bellwether because its package shipping business reflects both business and consumer demand. On Thursday the company’s chief executive predicted a “worldwide recession.”
    General Electric’s chief financial officer also warned of challenges, bemoaning lingering supply chain issues that remain “tough” and “impair our ability to deliver to our customers.”
    Economic worries were also evident in other corners of the financial markets: Corporate debt prices fell and oil prices notched a third straight week of losses.
    Mr. Tangen, of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, said that he did not think there was an investment area anywhere in the world likely to make money in the near future. “That’s the really depressing thing,” he said.
  • BAMBX’s current positioning?
    Here’s a very thorough discussion of BAMBX from last November:
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/58920/blackrock-systematic-multi-strategy-fund-bambx
    In it fred495 provided a direct link to LB’s Barron’s piece. It works whether you are a subscriber or not. I appreciated that. Reading Barron’s via an Amazon Kindle subscription does not allow me to access Barron’s website directly. So links to past articles don’t get me in the door. Fred’s link did work, however.
    Good article. The managers appear competent at what they do. They are bent on preserving capital - a worthy goal. What I’m trying to determine is the fund’s most recent weighting in long equity positions. Certainly behaves a lot more like a fixed income fund than a balanced, allocation or LS sort.
    Addendum
    Thanks Yogi & Lewis for your input. After more research I intend to keep BAMBX. It represents a small portion (around 15%) of a broader 45% allocation to Alternatives. It’s also the most conservative holding in that mix. To be down only 4-5% in a year when many intermediate bond funds have lost 10% or more is a tribute to the fund. It has dawned on me that there are other avenues I can pursue to ramp up risk exposure which involve buying or selling stocks or ETFs rather than mutual funds. I’m learning after a year with Fido that, when possible, it’s better not to make changes in NTF fund holdings as their 60-day holding period can come back to “bite” you at a later date.
    Regards
  • BAMBX’s current positioning?
    It's often hard to tell what many alt funds' true risk exposures are because of their derivatives usage so that a relatively tiny position asset wise in a stock futures or options contract can have a dramatic impact on returns. I would recommend going directly to the fund's web site and reading its specific literature to understand better than Yahoo or some other fund tracker site:
    https://blackrock.com/us/individual/literature/fact-sheet/bambx-systematic-multi-strategy-fund-factsheet-us09260c1099-us-en-individual.pdf
    https://blackrock.com/us/individual/literature/product-commentary/oef-systematic-multi-strategy-fund-qtd-commentary.pdf
    https://blackrock.com/us/individual/resources/regulatory-documents/stream-document?stream=reg&product=BR-SMS-AG&shareClass=Class+A&documentId=1699980%7E1699979%7E1704311%7E1865166%7E1912777&iframeUrlOverride=%2Fus%2Findividual%2Fliterature%2Fsemi-annual-report%2Fsar-retail-fixed-income-two-06-30.pdf
    Also: https://barrons.com/articles/a-2-9b-alternative-fund-that-actually-works-51606264740
    My understanding is BAMBX will generally be at least 50% invested in high quality bonds while the remainder will be split between a long-short equity strategy and a macro one that makes country bets.
  • BAMBX’s current positioning?
    A quick look: BAMBX cash levels reported by Yahoo, M*, Fido seem high but BlackRock doesn't report much cash. Discrepancy may be due to its nature - M* says that 50% of the portfolio is long and the rest market-neutral or long-short. So, that may be cash related to shorts, not cash allocation.
  • BAMBX’s current positioning?
    This is one segment of my alternative sleeve. Not disappointed in it, but considering shifting the $$ over time into more aggressive funds with the equity markets down so much this year.
    Yahoo’s “holdings” added up to only about 30% with no explanation of what the other 70% was. So I found the list below at Fidelity. At least it appears to add up to 100% - but not very illuminating. Fido lists two rows of numbers. The row on the right side is shaded. I’m guessing that represents the average weighing within its peer class. Have added slash marks between rows for clarity.
    For those who have followed the fund longer than I have, is the reported cash / bond exposure likely a temporary defensive position, or is this by and large a hedged income fund? What % exposure to equities or real assets (metals, real estate, etc.) would you expect this fund to maintain over longer periods?
    BAMBX - Portfolio Weight (Multistrategy)
    Cash & Equivalents 41.05% / 32.30%
    0
    Agency Mortgage-Backed 31.00% / 10.66%
    0
    Corporate Bond 24.60% / 13.89%
    0
    Convertible 1.91% / 3.42%
    0
    Asset-Backed 1.29% / 2.99%
    0
    Government 0.14% / 5.84%
    0
    Government Related0.01% / 26.71%
    0
    Bank Loan 0.00% / 1.33%
    0
    Commercial Mortgage-Backed 0.00% / 0.13%
    0
    Covered Bond 0.00% / 0.03%
    0
    Future/Forward 0.00% / 1.88%
    0
    Municipal Tax-Exempt 0.00% / 0.12%
    0
    Municipal Taxable 0.00% / 0.00%
    0
    Non-Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed 0.00% / 0.38%
    0
    Option/Warrant 0.00% / 0.02%
    0
    Preferred Stock 0.00% / 0.28%
    0
    Swap 0.00 / 0.01
    0
    LINK to BAMBX @ Fidelity https://fundresearch.fidelity.com/mutual-funds/composition/09260C109?type=sq-NavBar
  • Buy Sell Why: ad infinitum.
    Thank you
    Think large recession Loomming now prob for remaining this yr and very long time next yr
    Housing sector will turn over soon and may remain very weak for 12 months at least
    Us jobs probably be bad in few months w all demand destruction from feds policies and corporations do not perform well to keep hiring/lots terminations/weaken job market
    Inflation may have peak last few months....? Deflationary picture in 5 6 months??
    I think sp500 liklely will retest June lows and may leg down lowered < 3600 but no one knows how low we can go
    Market usually bottom 1/3 or 1/2 way through recession
    1962 recession showed double dip but rises after... Current Sp500 chart may resemble 1962
    For me no changes, has 17 yrs left. Keep buying tdf2050 and stocks in tsp-401k. May slow down w private trading portfolio, wait a little while w private trading portfolio or buy good fundamentals //healthcare /tech /banks/etf stocks
    New bull cycle maybe after ??!! Xmas
  • Alger Small Cap Focus Fund to resume sales
    Well-timed reopening!
    Current Barron's has a feature Alger Mid Cap Focus. Amy Zhang manages that AND Alger Small Cap Focus.
    https://www.barrons.com/articles/top-mid-cap-manager-tech-stocks-51663347771?mod=past_editions
  • Alger Small Cap Focus Fund to resume sales
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/3521/000119312522246470/d361298d497.htm
    497 1 d361298d497.htm ALGER SMALL CAP FOCUS FUND - CLASS AC,I,Y,Z
    THE ALGER FUNDS
    Alger Small Cap Focus Fund
    (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated September 16, 2022 to the
    Summary Prospectuses and Prospectuses of the Fund
    dated March 1, 2022, as amended and supplemented to date
    Effective July 31, 2019, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of The Alger Funds authorized a partial closing of the Fund. On September 13, 2022, the Board determined it would be in the best interest of Fund shareholders to resume sales of shares of the Fund to all qualifying investors. Therefore, effective or about October 17, 2022, the Fund’s Class A, C, I, Y and Z shares will be available to all qualifying investors.
    Shareholders should retain this Supplement for future reference.
  • Amazing / TROW down nearly 40% YTD
    Thanks, Yogi, for the additional color. Most fund companies have very high dividend (albeit variable) yields. Schwab's div yield (1.25%) is well below that of SPY, not to mention XLF. I am not sure comparing Schwab stock performance with other fund companies stock is appropriate, given its low AUM, low margin fund business, but I do not know what is an appropriate comparison for Schwab as i have not looked into the drivers of its financials statements.
    Schwab bank is certainly a high way robbery and Schwab brokerage facilitates the bank with no sweep MM funds.
  • Gundlach: DEFLATION???
    What is the point in knowing the effective tax rates anyhow, as they are meaningless for the vast majority of the ultra rich folks and corps that pay little if any taxes. I cannot remember which ones. but in the past year or so, I recall some S&P 500 companies paid no taxes and were actually refunded money by the IRS due to write offs ,probably from stock buybacks and other costs. Maybe you know who they were Lewis.
  • Gundlach: DEFLATION???
    Here's one attempt at calculating the effective tax rate of the wealthiest Americans over time: https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/effective-income-tax-rates-have-fallen-top-one-percent-world-war-ii-0
    Because of all the loopholes, it's a difficult endeavor, but one thing hard to ignore is that the effective rate has gone down significantly, from as much as 50% in 1945 to 25% more recently for the richest in this particular study.
  • 1-Yr T-Bill Yield Print 4.00% Today
    +1
    All true OJ. A guess would be it has to do with the speed of change (in rates). Over time people will get used to 6% mortgages or higher if their income / net worth keep pace.
    I well remember the 60s / 70s as a teen age “nerd” who subscribed to U.S. News & World Report at 15 and normally read it twice on a weekend. You may recall that the dollar weakened considerably over those inflationary years as cost of living rose from maybe 5% in the 60s to double-digit by the late 70s. Not to be overlooked, gold soared from $35 to over $800 by the mid 70s. Houses appreciated nicely and just about everybody in the world agreed they were the best investments.
    We baby boomers “goosed” the home buying frenzy helping push up interest rates. By contrast, equity investing lagged by about a decade but took off in the 70s as I recall. Once we had our homes, new cars (and in some cases kids) we began investing for retirement. My first home in the late 70s carried something like a 10-11% fixed rate mortgage. As my income kept pace - based on COL adjustments plus “stepping” (increases based on years service) - that interest rate didn’t seem onerous.
    So, simply put - It takes time for consumers and markets to adjust to new realities. I think in a plane what we’re witnessing right now might be called “bow shock.”
  • 1-Yr T-Bill Yield Print 4.00% Today
    My mortgage in late-1970s was at 10.75%. Those were different times. Real estate cap rates were quite high then. Valuations now are much higher for everything. Even the T-Bills are approaching the cap rate, thanks to the Fed, Twitter LINK.
    image
  • Buy Sell Why: ad infinitum.
    @johnN, while Stockcharts shows RSI(14) for $UST2Y, etc, it isn't really important. You are locking in yield at purchase to maturity, and for ST (up to 5 yrs), you can just hold on to maturity. See a nearby thread on $UST1Y at 4%.
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FcxuvmNXEAEa_3t?format=jpg&name=medium
  • Buy Sell Why: ad infinitum.
    Especially sir ust 2 yr 5 yr 10 yr IMHO so expensive rsi severely high
    Maybe wrong end of trade if keep buying them
    Maybe good buy small portions dca spy iwm and wait 12 36 months
  • 1-Yr T-Bill Yield Print 4.00% Today
    "Heard on the news today that 30 year fixed mortgages are now over 6%, Not that long ago they were 3-4%. That has to hit the housing market like a sledge hammer."
    @hank- At this point in time, I agree with you regarding the damage to the housing market. But what I'm having trouble with is the fact that back in the 70s, at least in SF, 30-year mortgage rates were typically in the 8% range, or even a little over. I remember, because we had an 8.5% mortgage for our first home, and that was with an excellent credit rating.
    And yet the real estate market, at least here in SF, wasn't in any particular trouble. Lots of people were buying and selling homes in that environment. Also, unlike today, there was no great shortage of "affordable" housing in the SF Bay Area, because there was still land available for new building in nearby areas.
    I really have no idea, but it seems to me that there must have been other factors involved in the general financial situation then, compared to now. I'd be very curious to know a bit more about all of that.