Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • 9/18/14...a big day for the markets and your funds?
    White paper from Mesirow Financial
    Scotland’s Hamlet Moment
    To Leave, or Not to Leave? That is the Question.
    By Adolfo Laurenti, Chief International Economist
    "Concerns about a breakdown in
    the union are palpable, however, especially
    in assessing how viable Scotland would be
    on its own. We tend to agree with a skeptical
    assessment, for the following reasons:
    For good or bad, the British economy is
    much broader and diverse than Scotland
    will ever be. In terms of revenue, Britain
    can provide better pooling of resources
    but Scotland would rely on gas and
    oil revenues, a very volatile source of
    funding, which is at the mercy of global
    fluctuations in energy prices. Do not be
    fooled by the relative stability in prices
    that we have experienced in recent years.
    Tax revenue based on oil accounts for
    something between 1% and 2% of
    UK total tax revenues. In the case of
    an independent Scotland, they would
    account for 10% to 20% of the total.
    Funding an expanded welfare system
    on such a volatile source of revenue is a
    borderline reckless policy choice"
    http://www.mesirowfinancial.com/economics/laurenti/themes/globalmkts_0914.pdf
    Also:
    Some campaigners for a Yes vote in Thursday’s referendum on Scottish independence have argued that Clair could generate income and tax revenues that would sustain Scotland’s public finances for decades, but industry sources have emphasized the technical difficulties of extracting the oil.
    http://seekingalpha.com/news/1983855-ft-conocophillips-to-sell-north-sea-oil-stake-for-2b-3b
    A D R /OT C stock purchases.
    If I plan to buy a foreign stock I run a test trade to see the brokerage charges.Anything more than normal,I just move on.Have owned Canadian energy monthly dividend payers and an Argentine A D R. Foreign taxes are deducted from Canadian dividends that show up as a credit on 1099. Not sure in I R A s.I was accessed a fee of about 2% on my A D R dividend.
  • Jeffery Saut ... Call of the Week ... "Then and Now"

    "The call for this week: I am in the San Francisco bay area speaking at various events and seeing accounts. I continue to find it fascinating that the portfolio managers (PMs) want to know what our advisors and their clients are thinking/doing, while our advisors/clients want to know what the PMs are thinking/doing. I believe this speaks to the fact that most are confused with the markets and that 77% of all active PMs are underperforming the S&P 500. This is likely because the surprise of the year has been the tremendous outperformance of the defensive sectors. To wit, Healthcare is up 14.70% YTD and the Utility sector has risen 10.35%. While we targeted Healthcare as a favored sector, we totally missed Utilities. I have also liked Technology, but recently I am hearing from tech companies their business with Russia has fallen off a cliff and I did not realize how big a consumer of U.S. technology Russia has become. This week investors will put on “rabbit ears” for statements out of the Fed meeting. Will Janet Yellen drop the phrase “considerable time?” Will she continue with “data dependent?” Or will she say “the FOMC’s view is that there is considerable slack that remains in place?” Accordingly, all eyes will be on the bond market to see its reaction to the Fed’s words. The other charts worth watching are crude oil, gasoline, and the U.S. Dollar Index. Also of note are Scotland’s independence vote and this week’s option expiration, both of which can be market moving."
    The complete commentary is linked below for your reading enjoyment ...
    http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm
  • While the S&P is in record territory, the Nasdaq is having problems.
    What concerns me regarding tech continues to be tension between US tech and china.
    China Internet Regulator to Qualcomm: 'We Should Make Money Together'
    http://online.wsj.com/articles/china-internet-regulator-to-qualcomm-we-should-make-money-together-1410346553
    More general:
    http://online.wsj.com/articles/u-s-firms-feel-less-welcome-in-china-1409624607
    ---
    As the article notes, I do think there's going to be money sucked out of other places that goes to Alibaba and you have had some spectacular flame-outs this year - Fireeye ramping into the 90's, only to fall back into the upper 20's, low 30's.
    Apple comes out with a new phone and it basically crashes the Apple website and telecom companies now appear tohave it on back-order, so there's still clearly desire for gadgets.
  • 9/18/14...a big day for the markets and your funds?
    Alibaba to boost IPO size:
    "Alibaba (Pending:BABA) is planning to increase the size of its IPO due to strong investor demand.Previously setting a $60-$66 price range per share, the Chinese e-commerce company plans to announce the new price range as early as today, and intends to raise the top end of the price range to above $70, Bloomberg reports.Alibaba is expected to set a final price for the shares on Sept. 18, with trading to begin the next day."
    http://seekingalpha.com/news/1981545-alibaba-to-boost-ipo-size
  • While the S&P is in record territory, the Nasdaq is having problems.
    An interesting article. 47% of Nasdaq stocks are in bear market mode which is opposite of the performance of the S&P. A symptom of things to come?
    http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-14/record-s-p-500-masks-47-of-nasdaq-mired-in-bear-market.html
  • Three Mistakes Investors Keep Making Again And Again
    FYI: (Click On Article Title At Top Of Google Search)
    Forget derivatives, inverse exchange-traded funds or 50-day moving averages. Investing shouldn't be difficult.
    Spend less than you earn. Put the difference in a low-cost broad-based index fund. Leave it alone and let it grow over time
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&site=&source=hp&q=three+mistakes+investors+wsj&oq=three+mistakes+investors+wsj&gs_l=hp.3...1808.11335.0.11766.28.23.0.5.5.0.103.1649.22j1.23.0....0...1c.1.53.hp..10.18.1085.gteS5e-LJBk
  • 9/18/14...a big day for the markets and your funds?
    Pay attention the the potential positive ripple effect to other Chinese internet stocks in general. KWEB is an etf that might be one way to participate in the supporting companies.
    M* list of KWEB's top 25 holdings:
    portfolios.morningstar.com/fund/holdings?t=KWEB&region=usa&culture=en-US
  • 9/18/14...a big day for the markets and your funds?
    Softbank is available as both an OTC listing and as an ADR. Any difference between the two?
    Foreign ordinaries (ending in F) at some (not all, check with your brokerage) brokerages cost an additional amount to trade in - a number of brokerages tack on an added fee, but they (at least that I've seen) don't tell you up front, so you're paying $X commission plus an amount you'll find out later. The amount varies depending on the country, but I've heard instances of some brokerages charging potentially high fees depending on the country.
    ADRs don't have this situation. In some instances, there may be a varying amount of ADRs per one foreign ordinary.
    One thing I've noticed - and this is just in my experience - foreign stocks often are not able to be set up for dividend reinvestment/DRIP, but when they are, in many cases the ADR is and the foreign ordinary is not.
    Scotttrade discussion on ADR vs ordinary:
    https://research.scottrade.com/knowledgecenter/Public/help/Article?docId=37010be1721740e0879fb4b3510db8ed
    There are also sponsored vs unsponsored ADRs:
    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unsponsoredadr.asp
    https://www.adr.com/ is an extensive ADR site set up by JPM to inform on ADR investing.
    Long story short, foreign ordinary vs ADR are two different ways to invest in the same foreign company. Both have pros and cons and what is best may vary depending on the situation/company.
  • 9/18/14...a big day for the markets and your funds?
    I've read that the initial public offer price for Alibaba shares may be increased before the IPO due to such strong demand already.

    That's what Jim Cramer has been saying. He seems to be a big fan of the IPO at the original price of $60-$66, but says they may raise the price and make it unattractive. Wonder if anyone on MFO can even get shares of it for the IPO, and if they will.
    You can get exposure to it pre-IPO via Softbank (SFTBY) or Yahoo. Softbank owns 37% of Alibaba and is not selling. I believe Yahoo has to sell a portion of their stake.
    I do think that the price will be increased, absolutely.
    As for Yahoo: "Based on the details disclosed in the F-1 filing, the market capitalization of Alibaba would be $147.54 billion at the mid point of the band offering (i.e $60-$66 per share). At this valuation, the pre-tax value of Yahoo’s 22.5% stake in the company work out to around $32.98 billion". Yahoo's current market cap is 42.65B. (http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2014/09/12/alibabas-ipo-price-likely-to-boost-yahoos-stock-price/.)
    Another way to play Alibaba: Softbank
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/101997292#.
    From that article: "With Softbank, the benefit you have is you have a manager who basically knows how to be a billionaire, there is no reinvestment risk as there is with [Yahoo CEO] Melissa Mayer."
    "With questions surrounding the governance of Alibaba, Garrity said investors may arguably be better off owning the company through a name that has a large stake, like Softbank. As an outside investor, given the ownership structure you're not really going to have a much of a say. You might as well align yourself with a company that's got a big seat at the table." (my note: Alibaba founder Yun Ma is a director on Softbank's board and Softbank founder Masayoshi Son is a director on Alibaba's board.)
    I do think that's a concern with Yahoo - the company has not done well in turning things around and while shareholders will apparently get some money from the stake in Alibaba that Yahoo has to sell, people are concerned with how Yahoo will spend the rest.
    Many think that either Softbank or Alibaba may buy Yahoo.
    I'm wondering if Softbank becomes another situation similar to Africa's media conglomerate Naspers, which owns a sizable stake in giant Chinese tech co Tencent. Look at Naspers over the last couple of years:
    http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=NPSNY+Interactive#symbol=NPSNY;range=2y
    Softbank also owns stakes in social media company Renren and many other odds and ends (such as a stake in Yahoo Japan and Brightstar, the world's largest mobile handset distributor.)
    Keep in mind that Alibaba continues to expand into other countries. US store 11main is opening (https://11main.com/preview)
    Lastly, there's some other companies that benefit, including Singapore Post (http://www.forbes.com/sites/hengshao/2014/05/28/alibaba-to-buy-249-mil-stake-in-singapore-post-to-step-up-intl-presence/), which Alibaba bought a 10% stake in earlier this year.
    "The moves signal the resolve of this e-commerce giant to expand its sprawling ecosystem beyond China’s borders. The market in Southeast Asia is an under-developed but fast-growing one. In 2013, e-commerce in Singapore and Malaysia increased by 15% and 25%, respectively, a report by Payvision says. In Indonesia, e-Marketer cites a growth figure of 65% for the year. As evidence of the region’s potential, last year Rocket Internet launched Lazada, the Amazon equivalent of Malaysia, following the success of its online fashion retailer Zalora, while Japan’s Rakuten set up a regional headquarters in Singapore.
    Besides local customers in the region, the SingPost investment also seeks to capture two underserved groups of Chinese customers: overseas Chinese looking to purchase products on domestic websites, and domestic ones looking to buy foreign products directly from abroad. Currently, the bulk of these transactions is conducted through friends, relatives, and buying agencies (dai gou), often evading tariffs. One estimate by the China e-business Research Center put the total transaction amount of delegated foreign purchases at $12 billion in 2013."
    "In Russia, the high volume of sales through AliExpress once paralyzed a local delivery services provider."
  • When Buying A Closed-End Fund Makes Sense
    (Click On Article Title At Top Of Google Search)
    FYI: To most investors, closed-end funds are targeted plays on various markets whose use of leverage can generate robust yields. A dollar, for instance, can buy $1.30 worth of exposure and the extra income that comes with it.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&site=&source=hp&q=when+closed+end+funds+make+sense+barron's&oq=when+closed+end+funds+make+sense+barron's&gs_l=hp.3...1869.15595.0.15987.41.40.0.1.1.0.102.2735.39j1.40.0....0...1c.1.53.hp..12.29.1991.GhmFeQuKJbk
  • Jonathan Clements: How To Throw Away A Fortune
    FYI: Today's topic: How to throw away a fortune—in seven easy steps. Ready to waste money? Here are some surefire strategies.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://online.wsj.com/articles/throw-away-a-fortune-in-seven-easy-steps-1410653131#printMode
  • Barrington Financail Advisors Sept Commentary
    BARRINGTON FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC.
    a Registered Investment Advisor
    (Celebrating 42 years of Professional Service)
    August 2014 Rebound
    EQUITIES, MLPs and REITS:
    We just experienced the best August in 14 years as the S&P 500 gained 3.8%. One indicator of why this happened is the S&P 500 Volatility index (VIX), which fell from 17.03% at the beginning of August 2014 to 12.09% at the end of August 2014. As you may know, this Index is a measure of fear in the market where many consider below a 20.0% index generally corresponds to less stressful, even complacent, times in the markets. Our Equity, MLP and REIT portfolios returned from a 4.2% to a high of 5.2% performance for August 2014 with the average of 4.65% thus beating the S&P 500 while having a lower risk rating.
    During the month I put more of our money to work using the larger cash position to purchase MU, HCLP,HES,WLK,DOW,CPE,AMZN,UA,LNKD,FISI,REX,BITA,PLNR,CMI,Z,SWIR,EPD,TWTR and HMES. I also sold SINA. This was a lot of activity but many of the purchases were to buy back stocks that I sold at the end of July before the large drop in the market on July 31, 2014. These buybacks are now performing for us. A few examples are BITA up 9.48%, CPE up 5.99%, FB up 21.27%, FISI up 4.30%, HCLP up 12.82%, PLNR up 14.30% and WLK up 9.39%. Some have not yet began to perform such as SWIR down 1.96%, UA down 1.71% and EMES down 0.50% since these were purchased towards the end of August 2014 and have not had time to move.
    In summary of the Equity, MPL and REIT holdings, I am well-pleased with our August 2014 performance and hope September is a good month as well.
    FIXED INCOME:
    We experience little change in the Fixed Income portion of our portfolios while keeping the percent of the total portfolio very low in relation to the overall Total.
    ECONOMY
    This is not the way things are supposed to be five years into an economic expansion, yet it’s the conclusion of yet another report probing chronic economic gloom. The new survey, by the Heldrich Center at Rutgers University, found 71% of Americans feel the recent recession changed the nation permanently and only 16% feel the next generation will end up better off. In 1999, 56% felt life would be better for future Americans.
    It’s axiomatic that something is wrong with the U.S. economy — but gloom itself may be part of the problem. Americans are so dour by some measures, they seem to be looking past opportunities as if programmed to see only pitfalls. Prosperity doesn’t come from the places many people seem to be seeking it, and if the middle class is, in fact, in decline, a large part of the reason may be a lost instinct for how to get ahead.
    To be sure, there are well-known problems with the economy that aren't easily solved. Wages are stagnant for many workers, household wealth remains depressed and many families are falling behind. Adding to the gloom, policymakers in Washington seem incapable of finding solutions, and they even make some problems worse.
    It’s also true, however, that the economy is growing at a decent pace, companies are hiring, and consumer spending, on the whole, is pretty good. In reality, we don’t have one U.S. economy, we have two: one that looks like the old one, in which people work hard and get ahead, and another filled with those glum, underemployed laborers living on the edge. There has always been an American underclass, but it seems to be growing, fed by a continual drip of downwardly-mobile people departing the middle class.
    The recession officially ended more than five years ago and ought to be a distant memory. These should be boom times with widespread optimism and robust spending. Yet, consumers are gloomy and the economy is limping along at subpar levels of growth.
    It’s becoming clear why: While jobs have returned, incomes have not. The latest evidence is a study by the U.S. Conference of Mayors that highlights stark disparities between the jobs lost during the recession and jobs gained since. The types of jobs lost paid nearly $62,000 per year, on average. The jobs gained during the past six years pay only about $47,000. That 23% shortfall adds up to about $93 billion in lost wages per year — money not being spent because it vanished from the economy.
    That startling wage gap reflects the demise of well-paying jobs that don’t require a college degree, which may be the single-biggest challenge facing families trying to uphold a middle-class lifestyle. The two sectors that lost the most jobs during the recession are manufacturing, with average pay of about $63,000, and construction, at about $58,000. Employment in those two fields is still about 3 million workers short of where it was at the start of 2008.
    It is my prayer that America wakes up to the reality of how poor the country’s leaders are doing in managing our economy and we make a drastic change in the elections that are coming up soon. We need elected people who understand how to solve the economic problems facing our nation. A recent poll of American voters revealed that many people think that Global Warming is a greater threat to America than the threat from Terrorists. We need to support Israel and build our defenses before we have another attack on American soil. May America return to God and receive His continued blessings. AMEN.
    Have a Blessed Day,
    William C. Heath, CFP®
    Chairman & CEO
    (713) 785-7100
  • 9/18/14...a big day for the markets and your funds?
    I'm reading the 18th to decide the price and the 19th for go live.
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/101997655
    However, that seems to go against the Chinese thing with numbers. The 18th makes more sense since the number 8 is a very good number for the Chinese.
  • Virtus And Newfound Hit The Market With Alternative Income Funds
    Whatever you do, don't buy the Class C shares. Those poor folks obviously don't know what they are getting into. See below:
    image
    Hmmm......I think I'll buy a fixed income fund with an annual expense ratio of 2.87%.
    Sounds like a great idea.
    Oops, forgot, they temporarily lowered the expense for the Class C shares from 2.87% to 2.16%. Much better deal.
    These people should be arrested. For crimes committed against Class C shareholders. And they are not very nice to their Class A shareholders either.
  • Virtus And Newfound Hit The Market With Alternative Income Funds
    https://www.virtus.com/individual-investors/mutual-fund-details?id=8564#tab_performance
    The dreaded LOAD word.....
    image
    2.12% annual expense ratio for an income fund? Is that acceptable, when the yield on the 10-year Treasury is only 2.6%?
    OK, it got lowered to 1.41%, but for how long? Is that just a temporary expense waiver that brought it from 2.12% to 1.41%, or something else?
  • Virtus And Newfound Hit The Market With Alternative Income Funds
    re. VASBX
    FEL= a mere 3.75%
    Contingent deferred sales charge= 0.50%, 18 frigin' months?(uh, I don't think so)
    e.r.= 1.41% ["gross" expenses of 2.12%... indeed]
    It's The Aston Way, writ large.
    No thank you very much.... I'll pass.
    @Old_Skeet What has happened to your standards? Deplorable! :)
  • The Closing Bell: U.S. Stocks End Lower
    HCP having tough time lately.
    Down 5-6 percent this week.
    But I bought it back in March when it was under $36.
    Closed Friday @$40.55. Still couple % above 200d average.
  • Ping Junkster: VWALX and VWIUX
    Robert, you are right in that junk munis are a different animal than junk corporates. The average junk muni fund has over 50% of their assets in investment grade while the average junk corporate has only around 10%. Morningstar I believe counts the "not rated" sector as junk so EIHYX and the other junk munis who all have unrated bonds will have a higher % there than just adding up BB to below B.
  • Ping Junkster: VWALX and VWIUX
    Thanks for your helpful comments, Junkster. I'd just assumed VWALX was in the High Yield category because of its name and e.g. YTD return, and although I know it's not at the top of the High Yield category, I thought that was because it's more conservative. .
    Not an asset class I know anything about, but it seems that even the Hi Yield Muni Funds/"Junk" Muni Funds have the bulk of their assets in investment grade bonds.
    Take for example a junk muni fund that has been mentioned on MFO many times, Eaton Vance High-Yield Municipal Inc I EIHYX, which is in Morningstar's Hi Yield Muni category.
    Only 16% of the bonds are rated below investment grade. Interesting.
    image