Monthly Archives: May 2011

Amana Developing World Fund (AMDWX), May 2011

By Editor

Objective

The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing exclusively in stocks of companies with significant exposure (50% or more of assets or revenues) to countries with developing economies and/or markets. That investment can occur through ADRs and ADSs.  Investment decisions are made in accordance with Islamic principles. The fund diversifies its investments across the countries of the developing world, industries, and companies, and generally follows a value investment style.

Adviser

Saturna Capital, of Bellingham, Washington.  Saturna oversees five Sextant funds, the Idaho Tax-Free fund and three Amana funds.  The Sextant funds contribute about $250 million in assets while the Amana funds hold about $3 billion (as of April 2011).  The Amana funds invest in accord with Islamic investing principles. The Income Fund commenced operations in June 1986 and the Growth Fund in February, 1994. Mr. Kaiser was recognized as the best Islamic fund manager for 2005.

Manager

Nicholas Kaiser with the assistance of Monem Salam.  Mr. Kaiser is president and founder of Saturna Capital. He manages five funds (two at Saturna, three here) and oversees 26 separately managed accounts.  He has degrees from Chicago and Yale. In the mid 1970s and 1980s, he ran a mid-sized investment management firm (Unified Management Company) in Indianapolis.  In 1989 he sold Unified and subsequently bought control of Saturna.  As an officer of the Investment Company Institute, the CFA Institute, the Financial Planning Association and the No-Load Mutual Fund Association, he has been a significant force in the money management world.  He’s also a philanthropist and is deeply involved in his community.  By all accounts, a good guy all around. Mr. Monem Salam, vice president and director of Islamic investing at Saturna Capital Corporation, is the deputy portfolio manager for the fund.

Inception

September 28, 2009.

Management’s Stake in the Fund

Mr. Kaiser directly owned $500,001 to $1,000,000 of Developing World Fund shares and indirectly owned more than $1,000,000 of it. Mr. Salam has something between $10,00 to $50,000 Developing World Fund. As of August, 2010, officers and trustees, as a group, owned nearly 10% of the Developing World Fund.

Minimum investment

$250 for all accounts, with a $25 subsequent investment minimum.  That’s blessedly low.

Expense ratio

1.59% on an asset base of about $15 million.  There’s also a 2% redemption fee on shares held fewer than 90 days.

Comments

Mr. Kaiser launched AMDWX at the behest of many of his 100,000 Amana investors and was able to convince his board to authorize the launch by having them study his long-term record in international investing.  That seems like a decent way for us to start, too.

Appearances aside, AMDWX is doing precisely what you want it to.

Taken at face value, the performance stats for AMDWX appear to be terrible.  Between launch and April 2011, AMDWX turned $10,000 into $11,000 while its average peer turned $10,000 to $13,400.  As of April 2011, it’s at the bottom of the pack for both full years of its existence and for most trailing time periods, often in the lowest 10%.

And that’s a good thing.  The drag on the fund is its huge cash position, over 50% of assets in March, 2011.  Sibling Sextant International (SSIFX) is 35% cash.  Emerging markets have seen enormous cash inflows.  As of late April, 2011, emerging markets funds were seeing $2 billion per week in inflows.  Over 50% of institutional emerging markets portfolios are now closed to new investment to stem the flow.  Vanguard’s largest international fund is Emerging Markets Stock Index (VEIEX) at a stunning $64 billion.  There’s now clear evidence of a “bubble” in many of these small markets and, in the past, a crisis in one region has quickly spread to others. In response, a number of sensible value managers, including the remarkably talented team behind Artisan Global Value (ARTGX), have withdrawn entirely from the emerging markets. Amana’s natural caution seems to have been heightened, and they seem to be content to accumulate cash and watch. If you think this means that “bad things” and “great investment values” are both likely to manifest soon, you should be reassured at Amana’s disciplined conservatism.

The only question is: will Amana’s underperformance be a ongoing issue?

No.

Let me restate the case for investing with Mr. Kaiser.

I’ve made these same arguments in profiling Sextant International (SSIFX) as a “star in the shadows.”

Mr. Kaiser runs four other stock funds: one large value, one large core international (which has a 25% emerging markets stake), one large growth, and one that invests across the size and valuation spectrum.  For all of his funds, he employs the same basic strategy: look for undervalued companies with good management and a leadership position in an attractive industry.  Buy.  Spread your bets over 60-80 names.  Hold.  Then keep holding for between ten and fifty years.

Here’s Morningstar’s rating (as 4/26/11) of the four equity funds that Mr. Kaiser manages:

  3-year 5-year 10-year Overall
Amana Trust Income ««««« ««««« ««««« «««««
Amana Trust Growth ««««« ««««« ««««« «««««
Sextant Growth «««« ««« ««««« ««««
Sextant International ««««« ««««« ««««« «««««

In their overall rating, every one of Mr. Kaiser’s funds achieves “above average” or “high” returns for “below average” or “low” risk.

Folks who prefer Lipper’s rating system (though I’m not entirely clear why they would do so), find a similar pattern:

  Total return Consistency Preservation Tax efficiency
Amana Income ««««« «««« ««««« «««««
Amana Growth ««««« ««««« ««««« ««««
Sextant Growth «««« ««« ««««« «««««
Sextant International ««««« «« ««««« «««««

I have no idea of how Lipper generated the low consistency rating for International, since it tends to beat its peers in about three of every four years, trailing mostly in frothy markets.  Its consistency is even clearer if you look at longer time periods. I calculated Sextant International’s returns and those of its international large cap peers for a series of rolling five-year periods since with the fund’s launch in 1995.  I looked at what would happen if you invested $10,000 in the fund in 1995 and held for five years, then looked at 1996 and held for five, and so on.  There are ten rolling five-year periods and Sextant International outperformed its peers in 100% of those periods.  Frankly, that strikes me as admirably consistent.

At the Sixth Annual 2010 Failaka Islamic Fund Awards Ceremony (held in April, 2011), which reviews the performance of all managers, worldwide, who invest on Islamic principles, Amana received two “best fund awards.”

Other attributes strengthen the case for Amana

Mr. Kaiser’s outstanding record of generating high returns with low risk, across a whole spectrum of investments, is complemented by AMDWX’s unique attributes.

Islamic investing principles, sometimes called sharia-compliant investing, have two distinctive features.  First, there’s the equivalent of a socially-responsible investment screen which eliminates companies profiting from sin (alcohol, porn, gambling).   Mr. Kaiser estimates that the social screens reduce his investable universe by 6% or so.  Second, there’s a prohibition on investing in interest-bearing securities (much like the 15 or so Biblical injunctions against usury, traditionally defined as accepting an interest or “increase”), which effective eliminates both bonds and financial sector equities.  The financial sector constitutes about 25% of the market capitalization in the developing world.   Third, as an adjunct to the usury prohibition, sharia precludes investment in deeply debt-ridden companies.  That doesn’t mean a company must have zero debt but it does mean that the debt/equity ratio has to be quite low.  Between those three prohibitions, about two-thirds of developing market companies are removed from Amana’s investable universe.

This, Mr. Kaiser argues, is a good thing.  The combination of sharia-compliant investing and his own discipline, which stresses buying high quality companies with considerable free cash flow (that is, companies which can finance operations and growth without resort to the credit markets) and then holding them for the long haul, generates a portfolio that’s built like a tank.  That substantial conservatism offers great downside protection but still benefits from the growth of market leaders on the upside.

Risk is further dampened by the fund’s inclusion of multinational corporations domiciled in the developed world whose profits are derived in the developing world (including top ten holding Western Digital and, potentially, Colgate-Palmolive which generates more than half of its profits in the developing world).  Mr. Kaiser suspects that such firms won’t account for more than 20% of the portfolio but they still function as powerful stabilizers.  Moreover, he invests in stocks and derivatives which are traded on, and settled in, developed world stock markets.  That gives exposure to the developing world’s growth within the developed world’s market structures.  As of 1/30/10, ADRs and ADSs account for 16 of the fund’s 30 holdings.

An intriguing, but less obvious advantage is the fund’s other investors.

Understandably enough, many and perhaps most of the fund’s investors are Muslims who want to make principled investments.  They have proven to be incredibly loyal, steadfast shareholders.  During the market meltdown in 2008, for example, Amana Growth and Amana Income both saw assets grow steadily and, in Income’s case, substantially.

The movement of hot money into and out of emerging markets funds has particularly bedeviled managers and long-term investors alike.  The panicked outflow stops managers from doing the sensible thing – buying like mad while there’s blood in the streets – and triggers higher expenses and tax bills for the long-term shareholders.  In the case of T. Rowe Price’s very solid Emerging Market Stock fund (PRMSX), investors have pocketed only 50% of the fund’s long-term gains because of their ill-timed decisions.

In contrast, Mr. Kaiser’s investors do exactly the right thing.  They buy with discipline and find reason to stick around.  Here’s the most remarkable data table I’ve seen in a long while.  This compares the investor returns to the fund returns for Mr. Kaiser’s four other equity funds.  It is almost universally the case that investor returns trail far behind fund returns.  Investors famously buy high and sell low.  Morningstar’s analyses suggest s the average fund investor makes 2% less than the average fund he or she owns and, in volatile areas, fund investors often lose money investing in funds that make money.

How do Amana/Sextant investors fare on those grounds?

  Fund’s five-year return Investor’s five-year return
Sextant International 6.3 12.9
Sextant Growth 2.5 5.3
Sextant Core 3.8 (3 year only) 4.1 (3 year only)
Amana Income 7.0 9.0
Amana Growth 6.0 9.8

In every case, those investors actually made more than the nominal returns of their funds says is possible.  Having investors who stay put and buy steadily may offer a unique, substantial advantage for AMDWX over its peers.

Is there reason to be cautious?  Sure.  Three factors are worth noting:

  1. For better and worse, the fund is 50% cash, as of 3/31/11.
  2. The fund’s investable universe is distinctly different from many peers’.  There are 30 countries on his approved list, about half as many as Price picks through.  Some countries which feature prominently in many portfolios (including Israel and Korea) are excluded here because he classifies them as “developed” rather than developing.  And, as I noted above, about two-thirds of developing market stocks, and the region’s largest stock sector, fail the fund’s basic screens.
  3. Finally, a lot depends on one guy.  Mr. Kaiser is the sole manager of five funds with $2.8 billion in assets.  The remaining investment staff includes his fixed-income guy, the Core fund manager, the director of Islamic investing and three analysts.  At 65, Mr. Kaiser is still young, sparky and deeply committed but . …

Bottom line

If you’re looking for a potential great entree into the developing markets, and especially if you’re a small investors looking for an affordable, conservative fund, you’ve found it!

Company link

Amana Developing World

© Mutual Fund Observer, 2011.  All rights reserved.  The information here reflects publicly available information current at the time of publication.  For reprint/e-rights contact [email protected].

LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX), May 2011

By Editor

Objective

The fund seeks current income and long-term capital appreciation.  The managers invest in a combination of blue chip stocks, investment grade intermediate-term bonds, convertible securities and cash.  In general, at least 25% of the portfolio will be bonds.   In practice, the fund is generally 70% equities.  The portfolio turnover rate is modest, typically 25% or below.

Adviser

Founded in 1979 Luther King Capital Management provides investment management services to investment companies, foundations, endowments, pension and profit sharing plans, trusts, estates, and high net worth individuals.  Luther King Capital Management has seven shareholders, all of whom are employed by the firm, and 29 investment professionals on staff.  As of December, 2010, the firm had about $8 billion in assets.  They advise the five LKCM funds and the three LKCM Aquinas funds, which invest in ways consistent with Catholic values.

Manager

Scot Hollmann, J. Luther King and Mark Johnson.  Mr. Hollman and Mr. King have managed the fund since its inception, while Mr. Johnson joined the team in 2010.

Management’s Stake in the Fund

Hollman has between $100,00 and $500,000 in the fund, Mr. King has over $1 million, and Mr. Johnson has a pittance (but it’s early).

Opening date

December 30, 1997.

Minimum investment

$10,000 across the board.

Expense ratio

0.81%, after waivers, on an asset base of $19 million (as of April 2011).

Comments

The difference between a successful portfolio and a rolling disaster, is the investor’s ability to do the little things right.  Chief among those is keeping volatility low (high volatility funds tend to trigger disastrous reactions in investors), keeping expenses low, keeping trading to a minimum (a high-turnover strategy increases your portfolio cost by 2-3% a year) and rebalancing your assets between stocks, bonds and cash.  All of which works, little of which we have the discipline to do.

Enter: the hybrid fund.  In a hybrid, you’re paying a manager to be dull and disciplined on your behalf.  Here’s simple illustration of how it works out.  LKCM Balanced invests in the sorts of stocks represented by the S&P500 and the sorts of bonds represented by an index of intermediate-term, investment grade bonds such as Barclay’s.  The Vanguard Balanced Index fund (VBINX) mechanically and efficiently invests in those two areas as well.  Here are the average annual returns, as of March 31 2011, for those four options:

  3 year 5 year 10 year
LKCM Balanced 6.1% 5.5 5.4
S&P 500 index 2.6 3.3 4.2
Barclays Intermediate bond index 5.7 5.2 5.6
Vanguard Balanced Index fund 4.9 4.7 5.2

Notice two things: (1) the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. LKCM tends to return more than either of its component parts.  (2) the active fund is better than the passive. The Vanguard Balanced Index fund is an outstanding choice for folks looking for a hybrid (ultra-low expenses, returns which are consistently in the top 25% of peer funds over longer time periods).  And LKCM consistently posts better returns and, I’ll note below, does so with less volatility.

While these might be the dullest funds in your portfolio, they’re also likely to be the most profitable part of it.  Their sheer dullness makes you less likely to bolt.  Morningstar research found that the average domestic fund investor made about 200 basis points less, even in a good year, than the average fund did.  Why?  Because we showed up after a fund had already done well (we bought high), then stayed through the inevitable fall before we bolted (we sold low) and then put our money under a mattress or into “the next hot thing.”  The fund category that best helped investors avoid those errors was the domestic stock/bond hybrids.  Morningstar concluded:

Balanced funds were the main bright spot. The gap for the past year was just 14 basis points, and it was only 8 for the past three years. Best of all, the gap went the other way for the trailing 10 years as the average balanced-fund investor outperformed the average balanced fund by 30 basis points. (Russel Kinnel, “Mind the Gap 2011,” posted 4/18/2011)

At least in theory, the presence of that large, stolid block would allow you to tolerate a series of small volatile positions (5% in emerging markets small caps, for example) without panic.

But which hybrid or balanced fund?  Here, a picture is really worth a thousand words.

Scatterplot graph

This is a risk versus return scatterplot for domestic balanced funds.  As you move to the right, the fund’s volatility grows – so look for funds on the left.  As you move up, the fund’s returns rise – so look for funds near the top.  Ideally, look for the fund at the top left corner – the lowest volatility, highest return you can find.

That fund is LKCM Balanced.

You can reach exactly the same conclusion by using Morningstar’s fine fund screener.  A longer term investor needs stocks as well as bonds, so start by looking at all balanced funds with at least half of their money in stocks.

There are 302 such funds.

To find funds with strong, consistent returns, ask for funds that at least matched the returns of LKCM Balanced over the past 3-, 5- and 10-years.

You’re down to four fine no-load funds (Northern Income Equity, Price Capital Appreciation, Villere Balanced, and LKCM).

Finally, ask for funds no more volatile than LKBAX.

And no one else remains.

What are they doing right?

Quiet discipline, it seems.  Portfolio turnover is quite low, in the mid-teens to mid-20s each year.  Expenses, at 0.8%, are low, period, and remarkably low for such a small fund.  The portfolio is filled with well-run global corporations (U.S. based multinationals) and shorter-duration, investment grade bonds.

Why, then, are there so few shareholders?

Three issues, none related to quality of the fund, come to mind.  First, the fund has a high minimum initial investment, $10,000.  Second, the fund is not a consistent “chart topper,” which means that it receives little notice in the financial media or by the advisory community.  Finally, LKCM does not market its services.  Their website is static and rudimentary, they don’t advertise, they’re not located in a financial center (Fort Worth), and even their annual reports offer one scant paragraph about each fund.

What are the reasons to be cautious?

On whole, not many since LKCM seems intent on being cautious on your behalf.  The fund offers no direct international exposure; currently, 1% of the portfolio – a single Israeli stock – is it.  It also offers no exposure (less than 2% of the portfolio, as of April 2011) to smaller companies.  And it does average 70% exposure to the U.S. stock market, which means it will lose money when the market tanks.  That might make it, or any fund with substantial stock exposure, inappropriate for very conservative investors.

Bottom Line

This is a singularly fine fund for investors seeking equity exposure without the thrills and chills of a stock fund.  The management team has been stable, both in tenure and in discipline.  Their objective remains absolutely sensible: “Our investment strategy continues to focus on managing the overall risk level of the portfolio by emphasizing diversification and quality in a blend of asset classes.”

Fund website

LKCM Balanced

© Mutual Fund Observer, 2011.  All rights reserved.  The information here reflects publicly available information current at the time of publication.  For reprint/e-rights contact [email protected].